Film review

The Post

2017 · Directed by Steven Spielberg · 1h 56m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceMeryl Streep spends two hours being talked over by men in suits and then picks up the telephone

DramaHistory

Washington, 1971. Kay Graham (Meryl Streep) has run the Washington Post since her husband died, and she is about to take the company public, which means a week of bankers, board meetings and being talked over. Her editor, Ben Bradlee (Tom Hanks), wants a paper that can beat the New York Times, and then the Times prints extracts from a secret Pentagon history of the Vietnam War, leaked by Daniel Ellsberg (Matthew Rhys), and the Nixon administration gets a court order to stop them. Bradlee sends Ben Bagdikian (Bob Odenkirk) out with a pocketful of change to find the source. Fritz Beebe (Tracy Letts) and Arthur Parsons (Bradley Whitford) warn Kay what publishing would do to the share offer. Robert McNamara (Bruce Greenwood), who commissioned the study, is her friend.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Spielberg’s account of the Washington Post and the Pentagon Papers is brisk, handsome and acted by people who know exactly what they are doing. It is also so sure of its own virtue that it never once lets us doubt how things will turn out.

In 1971 the New York Times began printing a secret Pentagon history of the Vietnam War, and the Nixon administration went to court to stop it. Steven Spielberg’s film is about the paper that picked up the story, and the woman who owned it. Kay Graham (Meryl Streep) has run the Washington Post since her husband died and is taking the company public, which means bankers, which means caution. Her editor, Ben Bradlee (Tom Hanks), wants the papers before anyone else. The film runs 116 minutes and is in a hurry for all of them.

It is a good film, made by people who know where the pieces go, and we enjoyed most of it. What it is not is suspenseful, and we think it wants to be. Liz Hannah and Josh Singer’s script has the shape of a thriller, with a source to be found and lawyers on the telephone at midnight, but everyone who matters announces which side they are on within a minute of arriving, and the film never lets us think the right side might lose. Most critics have found that rousing. We found it comfortable.

The craft is the reason to go. Janusz Kamiński lights the newsroom with white daylight hard enough to bleach the desks. Rick Carter has built a Post with low ceilings and too many typewriters, and, underneath it, a composing room of lead type. The sequence in which the story is set, plated and run, the presses starting and the editors upstairs feeling the building shake through their shoes, moved us more than anything anybody says in the film. Nobody speaks during it. Michael Kahn and Sarah Broshar cut it to the rhythm of the machines, and John Williams, who elsewhere pushes harder than the scenes need, lets the presses be the score.

Streep is doing something careful. Ann Roth dresses her in caftans and gold, and for the first hour she apologises with her shoulders: at the board meeting where Arthur Parsons (Bradley Whitford) explains her own company to her, at a dinner where the women get up and leave the men to talk. The scene in which she decides, on a telephone with Fritz Beebe (Tracy Letts) and a lawyer arguing at either elbow, is played small, one word said several times until she believes it. It is the best acting in the film. Hanks plays Bradlee as a growl in a striped shirt.

Bob Odenkirk is the surprise. Ben Bagdikian goes looking for the leak from pay phones, and Odenkirk plays him as a rumpled, worried man who is the only person in the film doing any reporting. His scenes with Matthew Rhys’s Daniel Ellsberg, a motel room and a great many boxes, are the closest the film gets to the grubbiness of the job. Bruce Greenwood gets one strong scene as Robert McNamara, telling Kay on a lawn what Nixon will do to her. Carrie Coon, David Cross and Jesse Plemons fill the newsroom.

Spielberg cannot resist saying it twice. Sarah Paulson, as Tony Bradlee, is handed a speech explaining to Ben why what Kay is doing is brave, minutes after we have watched Kay do it. Nixon appears only as a back seen through a White House window with his own tapes on the soundtrack, and each time the film gets cheaper. There is a final scene that exists to point at another, better-known film about the same newspaper. We were nodding along, and then we were irritated with ourselves for nodding.

Against Spielberg’s Lincoln (2012) and Bridge of Spies (2015), this one is thinner, because those had arguments in them and people we liked disagreed. Here everyone we like agrees, and the people who do not are bankers. Against Alan J. Pakula’s All the President’s Men (1976), which it keeps glancing at, it is brighter, faster and much less frightened.

It is a 12A, the sort of film you can put on with a teenager and have a decent conversation afterwards. Watch it for Streep on the telephone and Odenkirk in the phone box. The Post was in real doubt about how this would end; the film never is.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

78
Positive
19
Mixed
4
Negative
0
Los Angeles Times
21 December 2017 · Kenneth Turan
90*

The critic calls it propulsive major studio cinema made with real-world purpose that succeeds across the board, showcasing the value of newspapers holding government accountable. He singles out Streep's performance as the professional coming of age of Katharine Graham for particular praise.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
6 December 2017 · Todd McCarthy
90*

The critic calls it a vigorous, stirring true-life thriller that dramatizes the Washington Post's role in publishing the Pentagon Papers. Spielberg's brisk direction and the lead performances by Streep and Hanks are singled out for praise.

Read the full review →
Vulture
21 December 2017
90*

The review describes the film as a perfectly timed, crackling newspaper movie that serves as a Meryl Streep showcase. It praises Streep's understated performance as Katharine Graham and Spielberg's focus on the procedural elements of journalism.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
6 December 2017 · festival review
85*

The film is a crackling entertainment made with precision and political purpose that brings intelligence and electricity to its study of journalism, guided by urgent performances from Streep and Hanks. It singles out the contemporary relevance and Streep's least-fussy performance charting Graham's journey for praise.

Read the full review →
The Independent
17 January 2018
85*

The critic praises Spielberg's ability to make a newspaper drama thrilling despite its office-bound setting and compares it favorably to Spotlight as an equal in recent newspaper movies. They single out the cinematic treatment of the printing process and the strong performances by Streep and Hanks.

Read the full review →
Empire
7 December 2017 · Jonathan Pile
80*

The critic finds the film first-class on its own merits thanks to compelling leads and masterful direction, though it lacks the thrill of All the President's Men or the emotional heft of Spotlight. They highlight the prescient themes and strong acting by Streep and Hanks.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2018

Nominated
Best Actress
Nominated
Best Picture

If you liked this, try…