Cade Yeager (Mark Wahlberg) stands with Tessa and Shane outside a roadside gas station
Film review

Transformers: Age of Extinction

2014 · Directed by Michael Bay · 2h 45m · CH 16

In a sentenceThree credited editors, 165 minutes, and not one shot that tells you where anyone is standing

Five years after the battle of Chicago, the Autobots are being hunted. Cade Yeager (Mark Wahlberg), a broke inventor on a farm in rural Texas, buys a wrecked lorry from a derelict cinema to strip for parts and finds it is Optimus Prime (voiced by Peter Cullen), hiding and badly damaged. Within a day a CIA unit run by Harold Attinger (Kelsey Grammer) and his field man James Savoy (Titus Welliver) arrives at the farm, and Cade, his daughter Tessa (Nicola Peltz) and her rally-driver boyfriend Shane (Jack Reynor) are on the run with the robots. In Chicago, industrialist Joshua Joyce (Stanley Tucci) is building Transformers of his own out of the metal of the dead ones, with Attinger’s blessing and a buyer already waiting.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Michael Bay’s fourth Transformers film has a new cast, a new country and Stanley Tucci in a lab coat, and none of it stops the machine. At 165 minutes it is the longest and least coherent of the series.

Michael Bay’s fourth Transformers film starts again. Ehren Kruger’s script moves the story to Texas, where Cade Yeager (Mark Wahlberg), a broke inventor, buys a wrecked lorry for parts and finds it is Optimus Prime (Peter Cullen). The Autobots are now fugitives, hunted by a CIA man, Harold Attinger (Kelsey Grammer), and sold for scrap to an industrialist, Joshua Joyce (Stanley Tucci), who is building his own. It is a reasonable idea for a fresh start. The film then runs for 165 minutes, longer than any of the three before it, and the fresh start lasts about forty of them.

The first act is the best stretch, mostly because it is the only one at a scale a person can read. Amir Mokri shoots the Texas farm in low evening light, with the camera down near the dirt and the sky doing most of the work, and when Attinger’s men arrive and Cade’s barn goes up, Bay stages it as a raid rather than a battle. Wahlberg plays Cade as an exasperated dad who happens to be able to build a robot, and he is likeable in it. Jack Reynor’s Shane, the rally driver dating Cade’s daughter Tessa (Nicola Peltz), carries a laminated card explaining why that is legal in Texas, and the film thinks this is funny. It is not, and it tells you how little thought went into either of them.

Stanley Tucci is the reason to sit through the middle. His Joyce is a smooth, nervy salesman who has reverse-engineered the dead robots into a metal he can shape at will, and Tucci plays him as a man discovering, one line at a time, that he is out of his depth. Jeffrey Beecroft’s design for the company headquarters is a clean white laboratory in Chicago where a block of the stuff turns itself into a handgun and then a loudspeaker, and it is the one sequence in which the effects are allowed to be strange rather than loud. We laughed properly at Tucci twice, which is twice more than the rest of the cast managed between them.

Then the machine takes over. Roger Barton, William Goldenberg and Paul Rubell are credited as editors, three of them, and even so we spent long stretches unable to say where anyone was standing, who was firing, or why. A fight in a city street cuts to a robot’s shoulder, to a car flipping, to Peltz screaming, to a slow pan up a product, and back. Steve Jablonsky’s score runs underneath all of it at one volume, so there is no quiet to measure the noise against. Somewhere in the second hour we stopped trying to follow it and began watching the clock, and by the third we were angry about that, because the robots themselves look better than they ever have. You can see Hound (John Goodman) and Drift (Ken Watanabe) as separate bodies rather than a heap of parts, and nobody gives them a scene worth the detail.

The last hour moves to Hong Kong, and we will not describe what arrives there beyond saying it is on the poster. Mokri’s helicopter shots of the harbour are handsome, and the film treats the city as a place to break, which is what it did to Chicago. Marie-Sylvie Deveau’s job on Peltz is a pair of cut-off shorts and a camera angle. Li Bingbing’s Su Yueming is given a motorbike, a fight and no character. Kelsey Grammer glowers in a good suit.

Bay made Pain & Gain the year before this, a small, mean film that at least knew what it thought of its characters. Here he is back on the assembly line, and the difference shows. The first three Transformers films were loud and silly and had, at their best, a cheerful vulgarity; this one is loud and silly and solemn, and the solemnity is what wears you down. Most critics landed near where we have, and the few who enjoyed it mostly said they were enjoying the noise and not much else.

If you have a twelve-year-old who wants to see robots hit each other, there is nothing here that will harm them beyond the running time, and the 12A is fair. Everyone else should take the Tucci scenes and leave. We would not say that about a film we thought was lazy; this one is the opposite, every frame worked over by hundreds of people, which is the sad part.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

42
Positive
1
Mixed
10
Negative
13
Variety
22 June 2014 · festival review · Maggie Lee
70*

Lee finds the film an exhilarating spectacle, though its human characters and plot are weak. She praises the robots’ expressive physicality and the vivid Hong Kong locations.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
11 July 2014 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
65*

O'Sullivan finds the film's chaotic, franchise-sized spectacle entertaining despite its muddled plot and relentless excess. She particularly praises Bay's frenetic visual effects and the fun of the film's disorienting action.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
26 June 2014 · Betsy Sharkey
65*

Sharkey calls it a better Transformers film, though still not a great one. She praises the increasingly clear, technically impressive action battles, while noting the weak humor and overstuffed story.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
22 June 2014 · James Marsh
64*

The page identifies this as a review, but the review text is hidden behind a paywall. Its verdict and any specific praise or complaint are unavailable in the provided content.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· Kevin B. Lee
63*

The available page shell does not reveal the critic’s verdict. Its standfirst focuses on the interlocking parts of the fourth installment.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
9 July 2014 · 4/3/3 · David Ehrlich
60

Ehrlich finds the film messy and regressive but too wildly unpredictable to dismiss. He singles out its transparent portrayal of blockbuster globalism, especially the China-set final hour, as fascinating.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Transformers: Age of Extinction worth watching?
Transformers: Age of Extinction is not worth watching for anyone but a twelve-year-old who wants to see robots hit each other, and we scored it 38. Stanley Tucci's scenes as the industrialist building his own robots are the one good reason to sit through the middle. The rest is 165 minutes of noise in which we could rarely tell who was standing where.
How long is Transformers: Age of Extinction, and what is it rated?
Transformers: Age of Extinction runs 2h 45m and is rated 16 by the CH in Switzerland. It is a science fiction and action film.
Where can I watch Transformers: Age of Extinction in Switzerland?
Transformers: Age of Extinction is streaming on Paramount+ and Apple TV in Switzerland, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from CHF 4.50. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Transformers: Age of Extinction, and is it suitable for children?
Transformers: Age of Extinction is a 12A, and we think that is fair: the violence is robots breaking cities and each other, loud and constant but not bloody or frightening in a way that would trouble a child of twelve. The real hazard is the running time, which at 165 minutes will wear down a young viewer long before anything on screen does.
What should I watch after Transformers: Age of Extinction?
After Transformers: Age of Extinction, try Pacific Rim (2013, Fi1m 70): Giant robots hit giant monsters and you can always tell which is which. Then The Iron Giant (1999, Fi1m 88): A boy, a robot and a small town, done with feeling in under ninety minutes; and Shin Godzilla (2016, Fi1m 74): Japan’s answer to the city-smashing film, with committee meetings as the action.

Cast

Awards

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 2015

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

If you liked this, try…

  1. Transformers (2007) · not reviewed yetThe first one, when the joke was still a boy and his car.

  2. Pacific Rim (2013, Fi1m 70)Giant robots hit giant monsters and you can always tell which is which.

  3. The Iron Giant (1999, Fi1m 88)A boy, a robot and a small town, done with feeling in under ninety minutes.

  4. Shin Godzilla (2016, Fi1m 74)Japan’s answer to the city-smashing film, with committee meetings as the action.

  5. Mad Max: Fury Road (2015, Fi1m 88)Two hours of vehicles destroying each other, every cut legible from the back row.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever