Series review

Show Me a Hero

2015 · Created by David Simon · Series · 1h 00m · MPA TV-MA

In a sentenceYonkers elects a man who promises a fight and never forgives him for losing it

CrimeDramaWar & Politics

Yonkers, New York, 1987. A federal judge, Leonard B. Sand (Bob Balaban), has ordered the city to build a few hundred homes of public housing on its white east side, and the council has refused for so long that the fines are about to break the city. Nick Wasicsko (Oscar Isaac), a councilman not yet thirty, runs for mayor promising to appeal the order, with aide Jim Surdoval (Michael Stahl-David) and Nay Noe Wasicsko (Carla Quevedo), whom he is courting. Councilman Henry J. Spallone (Alfred Molina) leads the resistance and homeowner Mary Dorman (Catherine Keener) shouts at every meeting. Across town, in the towers where the housing already is, Norma O’Neal (LaTanya Richardson Jackson) is losing her sight.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

David Simon’s six-part account of a housing fight in 1980s Yonkers is patient, well acted and, in Oscar Isaac’s young mayor, has a lead performance worth six hours of anyone’s time. Paul Haggis directs as if he does not trust the writing, and the Springsteen songs say everything twice.

In 1987 the city of Yonkers, New York, had been ordered by a federal court to build a few hundred homes of public housing on its white east side, and had decided it would rather be fined into bankruptcy than do it. David Simon and William F. Zorzi have made six hours of television out of what happened next. It sounds like a council meeting, and a good deal of it is one. We were not bored for a minute.

We recommend it, with one caveat. The reason is Oscar Isaac. Nick Wasicsko runs for mayor promising to fight the court order because that is what wins, and within weeks he is the man who has to carry it out. Isaac plays him as someone who wants to be liked far more than he wants to be right, who does the right thing anyway, half by accident, and then cannot understand why nobody thanks him. Watch his face at the back of the chamber when a vote goes against him: hurt first, then arithmetic, then the smile for the cameras. Carla Quevedo, as Nay Noe Wasicsko, gives him somebody to lie to about how well it is going.

The council meetings are where the series lives, and they made us angry in a way we had not budgeted for. Alfred Molina’s Henry J. Spallone plays to a gallery of hundreds of homeowners screaming at the mayor and at Bob Balaban’s Judge Leonard B. Sand, who is not even in the building. Jo Francis and Kate Sanford cut these scenes long, holding on the shouting until it stops being exciting and starts being frightening. Catherine Keener is in that gallery as Mary Dorman, a homeowner who believes every word she is yelling, and the series follows her home. Keener plays her slow change without a scene announcing it.

Across town, in the towers where the housing already is, Simon gives equal time to the people a political drama would usually skip. LaTanya Richardson Jackson’s Norma O’Neal is a home help losing her sight, trying to get anyone to come to a building the agencies are frightened of. Natalie Paul’s Doreen Henderson and Ilfenesh Hadera’s Carmen Febles are younger women looking for a way out. For two episodes these strands sit alongside the politics rather than tying to them. Then Norma’s story tightens into a plain account of what it is to be poor and going blind in a place nobody visits, and it moved us more than the shouting did.

Peter Riegert’s Oscar Newman, the consultant who wants the homes scattered rather than stacked, and Jon Bernthal’s Michael H. Sussman, the lawyer who brought the case, are the two calm men in it, and Winona Ryder is sharp as councilwoman Vinni Restiano. Andrij Parekh photographs both halves of the city in the same flat, cold light, so the east side’s lawns look no warmer than the west side’s concrete. Laurence Bennett’s chamber has panelled walls and cheap chairs. Abigail Murray’s boxy suits and shoulder pads are of the period without being a joke. Nathan Larson’s score is spare and stays out of the way.

The caveat is Paul Haggis. Haggis does not trust a scene to have landed. He cuts to the reaction that tells us what we have just seen, he holds on a tear a beat too long, and above all he reaches for Bruce Springsteen. There is a great deal of Springsteen, over driving, over moving in, over a man sitting alone in a car, and each time the song says what the scene had already said, only louder.

Against Simon’s own The Wire, this is shorter, tidier and easier to follow, partly Zorzi’s doing and partly the subject’s: a court order has an end in a way a city does not. Most critics have liked it as much as we do, and the one serious dissent complains that the residents are written thinner than the politicians. For the first two hours that is fair. After that it is not.

Watch two episodes a night rather than six in a row. The council meetings are better with a break between them, and so is Nick.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

80
Positive
9
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics are warmly in favour. The consensus is that David Simon has made an unlikely subject, the fight over public housing desegregation in 1980s Yonkers, into six gripping hours, and more than one review ranks it alongside his earlier work. Praise clusters around Oscar Isaac’s restrained central performance, which almost every review singles out, and around Simon’s habit of treating tenants and council clerks with the same seriousness as the mayor. The period detail and the Springsteen-heavy soundtrack also get their due.

The spread is narrow. Reservations, where they appear, concern thinner supporting storylines, a running time some find heavy-handed and long, and direction by Paul Haggis that a few consider blunt. The one clear dissent comes from Paste, which reviews only the first two episodes and finds the script takes shortcuts and writes its non-white characters more thinly than its white ones. Nobody dislikes it.

The AV Club
14 August 2015 · A · Joshua Alston
95

The critic calls it Simon's most concise and accessible work yet, and a timely, compelling period piece that makes a passionate case for the value of careful journalism while digging human stories out of complex legal and political issues.

Read the full review →
Vulture
13 August 2015 · Matt Zoller Seitz
90*

The critic praises the series' radical humanism in treating all characters as equals regardless of social status and giving equal weight to their stories, making viewers care about marginalized lives and embodying an idealistic democratic impulse.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
5 August 2015 · Tim Goodman
85*

The critic describes it as a smart, gripping take on race and class in America that rewards viewer investment with strong storytelling and acting. It praises the humanity found in the characters and nuanced scripts, noting the universal themes of home and family alongside the direction by Paul Haggis.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
· Gill Crawford
80*

The critic finds the miniseries utterly compelling despite its subject matter of public housing desegregation battles in 1980s Yonkers. It highlights the strong pedigree from writer David Simon and director Paul Haggis along with excellent period detail and a Springsteen-heavy soundtrack.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
31 March 2016
80*

The critic finds the series a gripping exposé of political power and its corrupting effects. Oscar Isaac’s subtle, restrained lead performance stands out as the series’ greatest strength.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
16 June 2016 · ★★★★ · Ben Lawrence
80

The review calls the series compelling and complex despite its unpromising subject matter. It singles out Oscar Isaac’s nuanced performance for particular praise while noting thinner supporting storylines.

Read the full review →

Cast

If you liked this, try…