Aladdin (Mena Massoud) and Jasmine (Naomi Scott) walking through a busy marketplace
Film review

Aladdin

2019 · Directed by Guy Ritchie · 2h 07m · Statens medieråd 11

In a sentenceWill Smith is having a lovely time and the computer keeps turning him into a blue thumb

Agrabah, a desert city with a palace on the hill and a market below it. Aladdin (Mena Massoud) is a street thief who steals to eat and gives most of it away, with a monkey called Abu for company. Princess Jasmine (Naomi Scott) slips out of the palace in disguise while her handmaiden Dalia (Nasim Pedrad) covers for her; her father the Sultan (Navid Negahban) wants her married to a prince, and Prince Anders (Billy Magnussen) is the latest to try. The vizier Jafar (Marwan Kenzari) wants a lamp hidden in the Cave of Wonders and needs a thief to fetch it. Aladdin goes in, comes out with the lamp, and releases the Genie (Will Smith), who offers three wishes. The first is to become a prince.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Guy Ritchie’s live-action Aladdin repeats the 1992 cartoon almost beat for beat, with forty minutes added. Naomi Scott and Nasim Pedrad give it a pulse; the computer-made Genie and the anonymous direction take it away again.

Disney has remade its 1992 cartoon Aladdin with actors, and it is the same film: a street thief, a princess in disguise, a lamp in a cave, a genie with three wishes and the same songs in nearly the same order. Guy Ritchie directs, and he and John August have added a new number for Jasmine, a handmaiden for her to talk to, a love interest for the Genie and a framing device in which Will Smith, as a mariner, tells the story to his children. It runs 127 minutes, roughly forty longer than the cartoon. The additions are the best of it; the length is the worst.

Naomi Scott is the reason to stay. She has the voice for the songs and a straight back for the palace politics, and when the film stops so she can sing Speechless, the new song, she carries a number that belongs in a stagier show. Mena Massoud is quick on his feet and easy to like, and his scenes with Scott have the right nervousness. Nasim Pedrad, as the handmaiden Dalia, is the one invention that pays off: dry, sceptical of everyone, and funnier every time the film remembers she is there.

When Smith first comes out of the lamp as the Genie, blue and enormous, with a topknot and a torso made by a computer, we felt a small embarrassment on his behalf. The face was his, the body was not, and the join showed. Then he wishes himself down to a man in a waistcoat and the film relaxes, and so did we. He is not attempting Robin Williams, and he is right not to. He does Will Smith: fast, cocky, a hype man far better at teaching Aladdin how to talk to a girl than at being a hundred feet tall. Whenever the plot needs proper magic, the film hands him back to the computer, and the computer does not love him.

Alan Stewart shoots Agrabah in pink, gold and turquoise, and Gemma Jackson’s city borrows from Morocco, Rajasthan and the Gulf without settling anywhere: stacked fruit and hanging brass in the market, a palace like a wedding cake above it. Michael Wilkinson’s costumes are embroidered to within an inch of their lives. The Prince Ali parade is the one set piece that earns its money, a street full of dancers doing Bollywood shoulder work with Smith out front. James Herbert cuts the opening chase with the speed changes Ritchie has used since Snatch, slow then fast then slow, so that One Jump Ahead looks like an advertisement for trainers. After that the editing could be anyone’s. Alan Menken, who wrote the songs the first time, returns, and his tunes survive the louder arrangements.

The villain does not work. Marwan Kenzari plays Jafar young, quiet and whispering, a reasonable idea, but he never frightens anyone, and a film like this needs its children a little scared. The Cave of Wonders is a dark digital cavern with gold in it, and the finale is more of the same at greater volume, storms, smoke and shouting. Ritchie has made a film any competent hand on Disney’s books could have made. Apart from that chase, there is no sign he was there.

We should own the moment it got us anyway. A Whole New World, sung on the carpet over the rooftops and out across the desert, is played straight, Scott and Massoud sing it well, and for four minutes we were sold and slightly annoyed about it. Then it cuts back to plot.

Disney’s remakes have, at their best, found a reason to exist. The Jungle Book (2016) had a technology to show off. This one’s reason is that people liked the last one, and it produces a film you watch while checking it against your memory. Children who do not know the cartoon will have a good time, and it is a PG they can be left with. Adults who know it will spend two hours noticing what has been moved, and will come out wanting to watch the original, which is a recommendation of a kind.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

56
Positive
6
Mixed
15
Negative
6

Most critics come away neither delighted nor appalled. The reviews lean mixed, with a majority finding a lavish, energetic remake that gets the job done without improving on the 1992 animation. Praise settles on the cast: Will Smith’s Genie is the most discussed element and often the most enjoyed, Naomi Scott’s Jasmine and her expanded arc are widely liked, and Nasim Pedrad’s new handmaiden is singled out even in hostile notices. The Bollywood-influenced dance numbers and the central romance also earn regular mentions.

The reservations gather around whether the film needed to exist. Many critics see a glossy retread that cleaves too closely to the original to justify itself, with the CGI Genie a frequent complaint and Guy Ritchie’s direction described as anonymous. The spread is wide: The Guardian and IndieWire call it lively and unexpectedly funny, while Film Comment and Slant find it moribund and perfunctory. Smith himself divides the reviews, with Empire finding him constrained and The AV Club subdued.

IndieWire
22 May 2019 · Kate Erbland
80*

The critic calls it an unexpectedly fun and frisky remake that is far better and more coherent than trailers suggested. Will Smith's full-force performance as the Genie steals the show and is singled out as the standout element.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
22 May 2019
80*

The critic finds Guy Ritchie’s live-action remake lively, colourful and genuinely funny, with judicious tweaks to the original that keep it fun without overhauling a strong story. They single out the respectful casting of brown-skinned actors and Will Smith’s human, life-of-the-party Genie as highlights.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
24 May 2019 · Charlotte O'Sullivan
77*

The critic finds it a fun spin-off rather than superior to the original, praising the energetic quadruple-act dynamic (especially Will Smith’s entertaining, elastic Genie performance and the new romance subplot), the revamped Jasmine with her new song and agency, the choreography and action, and the lavish production, while noting the villain Jafar is a weak point.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
22 May 2019 · Justin Chang
69*

While far from vital, the movie isn’t the disastrous remake feared; it is mostly middling, fitfully funny, and never unpleasant, slyly disarming questions about its necessity with charm and some upgrades. The critic singles out the music, Nasim Pedrad’s performance, and the central romance (including the magic carpet ride) for praise while noting the slick anonymity of the direction and cosmetic nature of the changes.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
22 May 2019
62*

The film is sometimes dazzling but more often workmanlike, achieving a faithful supersized recreation of the animated original. Despite sublime songs and occasional arresting moments, the most potent element is its intentional air of déjà vu and the sense that little risk is taken.

Read the full review →
Empire
22 May 2019 · ★★★ · Dan Jolin
60

The critic calls it another lavish and largely entertaining Disney re-do with strong turns from Massoud and Scott, but notes it feels like standard remake business with little of Ritchie’s distinctive style beyond a slick opening and minor Jafar tweaks; the main complaint is Will Smith’s Genie feeling disappointingly constrained by the original and marred by ghastly CGI.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Aladdin worth watching?
Aladdin (2019) is worth watching for children who do not know the 1992 cartoon, and we scored it 57. Naomi Scott, Mena Massoud and Nasim Pedrad give it a pulse, and A Whole New World still works on the carpet, but the computer-made Genie and forty added minutes drag. Adults who remember the original will spend two hours checking it against their memory.
How long is Aladdin, and what is it rated?
Aladdin runs 2h 07m and is rated 11 by the Statens medieråd in Sweden. It is an adventure and fantasy film.
Where can I watch Aladdin in Sweden?
Aladdin is streaming on Zee5 and Disney+ in Sweden, and it is also available to rent from Apple TV and Amazon Prime Video from kr 49.00. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Aladdin compare to Aladdin?
Aladdin (2019) tells the same story as the 1992 cartoon almost beat for beat, with forty minutes added and a Genie built by a computer rather than drawn. The original is the tighter and funnier of the two, with Robin Williams unleashed; the remake has the better romance and a good new song for Jasmine. Children new to both will enjoy either, but the cartoon is the one we recommend.
What should I watch after Aladdin?
After Aladdin, try Aladdin (1992, Fi1m 82): The original, ninety minutes, Robin Williams unleashed; watch it and understand the remake’s problem. Then Paddington 2 (2017, Fi1m 91): The family film Disney keeps failing to make: kind, funny, and not a minute too long.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Aladdin (1992, Fi1m 82)The original, ninety minutes, Robin Williams unleashed; watch it and understand the remake’s problem.

  2. The Thief of Bagdad (1940) · not on Fi1m yetTechnicolor Arabian Nights with a flying horse and a genie who really is frightening.

  3. The Adventures of Prince Achmed (1926) · not on Fi1m yetPaper silhouettes, a flying horse and a sorcerer, made in Germany nearly a century ago.

  4. Om Shanti Om (2007) · not on Fi1m yetBollywood spectacle done by people who mean it, with dance numbers Prince Ali only borrows.

  5. Paddington 2 (2017, Fi1m 91)The family film Disney keeps failing to make: kind, funny, and not a minute too long.