Manuel (Spencer Tracy), Harvey (Freddie Bartholomew) and Captain Disko Troop (Lionel Barrymore) smile under canvas
Film review

Captains Courageous

1937 · Directed by Victor Fleming · 1h 55m

In a sentenceA spoiled boy falls off a liner and lands on the only ship in the Atlantic that will not turn round for money

Harvey Cheyne (Freddie Bartholomew) is the motherless son of a tycoon, Frank Burton Cheyne (Melvyn Douglas), and has learned from him that anything can be bought. Suspended from boarding school for trying to bribe a classmate, he is taken aboard a liner bound for Europe, hangs over the rail after too many ice cream sodas and falls into the Atlantic. A Portuguese fisherman, Manuel Fidello (Spencer Tracy), hauls him into his dory and rows him to the Gloucester schooner We’re Here. Its skipper, Disko Troop (Lionel Barrymore), does not believe a word about the rich father, will not abandon a season’s fishing on the Banks to take him home, and offers him three dollars a month to work alongside his own son Dan (Mickey Rooney) until the hold is full.

Fi1m review

Victor Fleming’s film of Kipling’s novel puts a spoilt rich boy on a Gloucester fishing schooner and lets the sea and Spencer Tracy sort him out. It is sentimental, it knows it, and it earns most of what it asks for.

The poster called it as great as Mutiny on the Bounty, which is the sort of thing posters said in 1937. For once the boast is close to true. Victor Fleming’s film of Rudyard Kipling’s novel, from a screenplay credited to Marc Connelly, John Lee Mahin, Dale Van Every and Tom Kilpatrick, is a big studio picture about a small moral: a boy who has never had to do anything is made to do something. It is sentimental from the first reel to the last, and it is honest about how men on a working boat talk and behave, and the second keeps the first from going soft.

Freddie Bartholomew plays Harvey properly, which means unpleasantly. For the first twenty minutes he lies, sulks, threatens the crew with his father’s lawyers and tries to buy his way ashore, and Bartholomew does not soften any of it. The film needs a boy you would not want in your house, and gets one. Melvyn Douglas, as the father who signs cheques instead of turning up, is good in the little he is given. He is given little.

Then there is Spencer Tracy. Manuel Fidello has tight curls, a rolling accent from somewhere between Lisbon and a music hall, and a hurdy-gurdy he plays badly while singing “Yeah Ho, Little Fish”. For ten minutes we winced. Then we stopped, because Tracy plays the man as someone who likes his boat, his catch and this wretched boy, in roughly that order, and never asks us to find him lovable. When Manuel tells Harvey about his dead father, whom he still talks to at night over the side of the dory, and Harvey does not know what to say, we found we did not either. It is the scene we would use to explain the film to a stranger.

Lionel Barrymore’s Disko Troop runs the We’re Here like a ledger: a boy who eats will fish. Barrymore keeps the gruffness low and does not perform it. Mickey Rooney’s Dan is the boat’s other boy, the one who has never been asked whether he wants to work, and Rooney plays the cheerfulness of someone who has not noticed the question. John Carradine’s Long Jack takes an immediate dislike to Harvey and is right to. Charley Grapewin’s Uncle Salters mutters at the edge of most scenes.

Harold Rosson shot a good deal of it on real schooners under sail, and it shows. Dories go out into fog, the fleet sits on grey water with nothing behind it but more grey water, and men gut fish on a deck that is moving. There are stretches where the plot stops and the film just watches men work, and those were the stretches we liked best. The join with the studio tank is visible: rear projection behind Tracy in the dory has that lit-from-the-wrong-side look, and one storm is plainly a model in a bath. Elmo Veron cuts the fishing on the swing of a line and is at his slackest whenever the film goes back to land. Franz Waxman’s score stays out of the way for long stretches, then leans on Manuel’s tune whenever it wants us to feel something.

The faults are the ones you would guess. The scenes ashore, with Douglas in offices and hotel rooms, stop the film every time. The second half takes a turn we will not describe, and after it the film pushes hard for twenty minutes, with the music up and the boy’s face held longer than it needs to be. That is where we noticed the film’s hand. We minded less than we expected. At 115 minutes it could lose ten.

Fleming made The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind two years later, and neither has a scene as unshowy as Manuel rowing in the fog. Louis D. Lighton’s production has the money to build a liner and a schooner and the sense to keep the camera on the schooner. Among films that make a rotten child good through hardship, and there are many, this one is unusual in letting the hardship be dull, wet and repetitive.

Watch it with a child of about ten if you have one to hand. They will be restless through the school and the liner and not at all once the dory hits the water. Keep a handkerchief within reach. You will know exactly what the film is doing to you and hand it over anyway.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

3 of 6
Positive
3
Mixed
0
Negative
0
The New Yorker
8 May 1937 · John C. Mosher
90*

The film is described as a comfort and a triumph, with fog, water, boats, fish and human beings making as rich a picture as any that spring. The ocean and fishing fleet are singled out as magnificent, along with prize performances from Freddie Bartholomew and Spencer Tracy.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
12 May 1937
90*

The critic calls it another grand job of movie-making from MGM, with rich production, magnificent marine photography, admirable direction and performances that bring Kipling's novel vividly to life. The depiction of the Gloucester fishing fleet stands out for its almost documentary quality enriched by poetic photography.

Read the full review →
Variety
31 December 1936 · Variety Staff
90*

The Kipling yarn has been given splendid production, performance, photography and dramatic composition after minor alterations to the story. Spencer Tracy's performance as the Portuguese fisherman Manuel is highlighted alongside strong work from the rest of the cast and the overall fine production values.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Captains Courageous worth watching?
Captains Courageous is worth watching, and we scored it 84. Spencer Tracy's Portuguese fisherman takes ten minutes to stop wincing at and then carries the film, and the stretches shot on real schooners under sail are the best of it. The scenes ashore drag, and the last twenty minutes push hard for tears, but it earns most of what it asks for.
How long is Captains Courageous, and what is it rated?
Captains Courageous runs 1h 55m. It is an adventure and drama film.
Where can I watch Captains Courageous in Poland?
Captains Courageous is not on any streaming or rental service in Poland at the moment. Availability is checked daily.
How does Captains Courageous compare to The Yearling?
Captains Courageous and The Yearling both put a boy through a hard growing-up, one at sea and one in the Florida scrub with a fawn. The earlier film is the livelier of the two, with the fishing scenes giving it a working texture the quieter, more patient Yearling does not have. Both scores lean on you; Waxman at least waits for the second half before doing so.
Is Captains Courageous based on a true story or a book?
Captains Courageous is based on Rudyard Kipling's novel of the same name, not on a true story. The film keeps the book's spine, a spoilt rich boy rescued by a Gloucester fishing schooner and made to work, though the screenplay shapes Manuel into a larger part for Spencer Tracy. Knowing the novel is not needed to follow or enjoy it.
What should I watch after Captains Courageous?
After Captains Courageous, try The Yearling (1946, Fi1m 79): Another boy grows up the hard way, this time in the Florida scrub with a fawn. Then Kes (1969, Fi1m 88): The British answer: a Barnsley boy, a kestrel and no sentiment whatsoever; and The Black Stallion (1979, Fi1m 87): Shipwreck, a boy, a horse, and a first hour with almost no dialogue.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1938

Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Writing, Adapted Screenplay
Won
Best Actor

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Yearling (1946, Fi1m 79)Another boy grows up the hard way, this time in the Florida scrub with a fawn.

  2. Kes (1969, Fi1m 88)The British answer: a Barnsley boy, a kestrel and no sentiment whatsoever.

  3. The Black Stallion (1979, Fi1m 87)Shipwreck, a boy, a horse, and a first hour with almost no dialogue.

  4. Whale Rider (2002) · not reviewed yetA Maori girl takes on her grandfather’s traditions on the New Zealand coast.

  5. Moby Dick (1956) · not reviewed yetHuston’s Melville, for when the sea should be the enemy rather than the teacher.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever