President Bennett (Donald Moffat) and Jack Ryan (Harrison Ford) stand beside a desk in the presidential office
Film review

Clear and Present Danger

1994 · Directed by Phillip Noyce · 2h 21m · Statens medieråd 15

In a sentenceMen in good suits lie to each other in nice rooms until Harrison Ford gets stuck in Bogotá traffic

A US Coast Guard cutter boards a yacht and finds a wealthy American and his family murdered on board. The dead man was a friend of President Bennett (Donald Moffat), and the killers worked for a Colombian drug cartel. In Washington, National Security Advisor James Cutter (Harris Yulin) and CIA Deputy Director Robert Ritter (Henry Czerny) take the President’s anger as permission for a secret war in Colombia, run on the ground by field officer John Clark (Willem Dafoe) with a team of soldiers that includes Domingo Chavez (Raymond Cruz). Jack Ryan (Harrison Ford), an analyst newly made acting Deputy Director, is sent to Congress to ask for money for an operation nobody has told him about. In Colombia, cartel boss Ernesto Escobedo (Miguel Sandoval) and his intelligence officer, Colonel Felix Cortez (Joaquim de Almeida), start playing a game of their own.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Phillip Noyce’s second Jack Ryan film is the best of the three: a patient, grown-up thriller about who in Washington gave the order, with one of the decade’s great ambushes at its centre. The jungle half is routine, and it runs long.

Phillip Noyce’s second Jack Ryan film, after Patriot Games (1992), is the one in which the villain is a memo. A president’s friend is murdered by a Colombian cartel, the president says something intemperate in the Oval Office, and two of his advisers take it as an order, run a small war on his behalf and make sure no paper connects him to it. Clear and Present Danger is a thriller about who gave the order, and it is patient, well acted and for long stretches properly tense. It is the best of the three Ryan films made by that point. It is also twenty minutes too long, and the half of it set in the jungle never matches the half set in offices.

The screenplay, by Donald E. Stewart, Steven Zaillian and John Milius, takes Tom Clancy’s doorstop and keeps the part that matters: the argument. Its best scenes are quiet lies told in carpeted rooms. Harris Yulin’s Cutter, the National Security Advisor, has never said a sentence he could be quoted on. Henry Czerny’s Ritter, the CIA deputy who runs the operation, gives the film its best performance, a clever, tired man who despises Ryan’s decency and says so to his face in a voice he barely raises. Donald Moffat plays President Bennett as a genial uncle, which is exactly what makes him frightening. A scene in which two men race each other through a computer file is as gripping as anything in the film with a gun in it.

Ford plays Ryan as a man who is good at his job and poor at reading the consensus. Newly made acting Deputy Director while his superior is ill, he spends the first hour being lied to by people who have decided he is too honest to be told things. He is not an action hero here; when he does pick up a weapon he looks as if he resents it. What Ford does well is anger, slow and righteous and faintly embarrassed about itself, and the film builds towards letting him use it. Willem Dafoe’s Clark, running the soldiers on the ground, is the film’s other still point, and Noyce never tells us how much he knows. Joaquim de Almeida’s Cortez, the cartel’s intelligence man, is the only character on either side who understands all the others.

Donald McAlpine lights Washington hard and bright, flat daylight in the hearing room and white corridors at Langley, and Colombia in heat haze and dense green. Terence Marsh gives Ernesto Escobedo (Miguel Sandoval) a hacienda of horses and tiled courtyards, and the Americans rooms with nothing on the walls. Neil Travis cuts the two countries against each other, so that Ryan is asking Congress for money at the same moment Raymond Cruz’s Chavez is lying in the undergrowth spending it. James Horner scores the soldiers with military snare and low brass and mostly leaves the Washington scenes alone, which is the right call.

Then there is Bogotá. Ryan’s convoy of armoured cars is boxed into a narrow street in daylight, in traffic, and rockets come out of the windows above. Noyce shoots it from inside the cars, so we hear the rounds hit the glass before we see where they come from, and Travis holds the shots long enough that we always know where every vehicle is. We were frightened, properly frightened, in a way we had not expected from a studio thriller with a 12 certificate, because the sequence does the simplest thing well: it puts people we care about in a box and shows us they cannot get out. The film never climbs that high again, and does not try to.

What follows in Colombia is competent and ordinary. Chavez and Captain Ramirez (Benjamin Bratt) move through the jungle with laser designators and night scopes, and the set pieces are the ones you would expect: a raid, an airstrike, a long walk. The final action sequence is routine, and the film we had been watching for two hours was not. Anne Archer and Thora Birch, as Ryan’s wife and daughter, return from Patriot Games with almost nothing to do, and at 141 minutes the film could have lost a jungle set piece without anyone noticing.

Against the series, this is the one that trusts its audience with an argument about power rather than a submarine or a bomb. Watch it at home, where the Washington scenes lose nothing and the jungle loses little, and keep an eye on Czerny, who is doing the most interesting work in it from the second row. It carries a 12.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

67
Positive
4
Mixed
2
Negative
1

Most critics come down in favour, and the praise clusters in two places. The first is the plotting: reviewers describe an intricate, politically literate conspiracy that keeps its Washington and Colombian strands moving in parallel without losing the thread. The second is the Bogota ambush, which more than one review singles out as the standout set piece and the point where the film earns its length. Harrison Ford’s Jack Ryan is consistently well received, with Radio Times calling the performance commanding and Empire finding it compelling.

The reservations are about pace and payoff. Variety finds the excitement only intermittently thrilling and the final action scene flat and routine, while Radio Times thinks the film is slow to gather momentum before the political connections fall into place. The spread is fairly wide. The one outright dissent comes from Time Out, which finds this third Jack Ryan outing dispiriting, though the reasoning survives only in outline.

Los Angeles Times
3 August 1994 · Kenneth Turan
85*

Turan calls it the best and most tightly wound Tom Clancy adaptation, praising its intricately woven plot and nuanced characters. He especially singles out the convincing performances and dialogue about covert operations in Washington.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Ian Freer
80*

Freer finds the film a politically complex, surefooted blockbuster that balances intelligent conspiracy plotting with action. He particularly praises the expertly orchestrated Bogota ambush and Harrison Ford’s compelling Jack Ryan.

Read the full review →
Variety
1 August 1994 · Todd McCarthy
75*

McCarthy finds the film an absorbing, politically relevant thriller, though its excitement only occasionally becomes genuinely thrilling. He praises the complex plot and morally ambiguous characters, while noting that the final action scene feels flat and routine.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 August 1994 · Janet Maslin
64*

The URL identifies a review of the matching film, but the page text is inaccessible. I can’t verify the critic’s verdict or what the review singles out for praise or complaint.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★ · David Parkinson
60

Parkinson finds the film slow to gather momentum but exciting once its political connections are established. He praises Harrison Ford’s commanding performance and Phillip Noyce’s direction.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· TJ
30*

The review presents the film as a dispiriting third outing for Jack Ryan. It singles out Ford’s rugged protagonist being promoted to Deputy Director, though the available text gives no further detail.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Clear and Present Danger worth watching?
Clear and Present Danger is worth watching for anyone who likes a political thriller built on quiet lies in carpeted rooms rather than explosions, and we scored it 75. The Washington half is patient and well acted, with Henry Czerny doing the most interesting work, and the Bogotá ambush is one of the decade's great set pieces. The jungle half is routine and the film runs twenty minutes too long.
How long is Clear and Present Danger, and what is it rated?
Clear and Present Danger runs 2h 21m and is rated 15 by the Statens medieråd in Sweden. It is an action and drama film.
Where can I watch Clear and Present Danger in Sweden?
Clear and Present Danger is streaming on Netflix in Sweden, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from kr 29.00. It leaves Netflix on 2 October. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Clear and Present Danger, and is it suitable for children?
Clear and Present Danger carries a UK 12 certificate and is a grown-up thriller rather than a bloody one, with much of its tension coming from men lying to each other in offices. The Bogotá ambush, in which armoured cars are boxed in and hit by rockets, is frightening in a way we did not expect from a 12. Fine for older children and teenagers; younger viewers will find the politics slow.
How does Clear and Present Danger compare to Three Days of the Condor?
Clear and Present Danger and Three Days of the Condor both follow a CIA analyst who discovers his own agency is working against him, and the earlier film is the model for Ryan's predicament. Pollack's film is tighter and more lucid, carried by Redford's watchful intelligence, though its romance is harder to believe than its conspiracy. Noyce's is longer and more conventional in its action, but its argument about who gave the order is the sharper of the two.
Is Clear and Present Danger based on a true story or a book?
Clear and Present Danger is based on Tom Clancy's novel of the same name, not on a true story. The screenplay keeps the part of the doorstop that matters, the argument over who authorised a secret war in Colombia, and trims the rest. You do not need to have read the book, or seen Patriot Games, to follow it.
What should I watch after Clear and Present Danger?
After Clear and Present Danger, try Three Days of the Condor (1975, Fi1m 80): Redford’s analyst discovers his own agency wants him dead; the model for Ryan’s predicament. Then Z (1969, Fi1m 84): Costa-Gavras follows a political murder up the chain of command, briskly and furiously; and Sicario (2015, Fi1m 80): The cartel war as the Americans actually fight it, with the convoy sequence to match.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1995

Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Sound Editing

If you liked this, try…

  1. Three Days of the Condor (1975, Fi1m 80)Redford’s analyst discovers his own agency wants him dead; the model for Ryan’s predicament.

  2. Z (1969, Fi1m 84)Costa-Gavras follows a political murder up the chain of command, briskly and furiously.

  3. Sicario (2015, Fi1m 80)The cartel war as the Americans actually fight it, with the convoy sequence to match.

  4. The Hunt for Red October (1990, Fi1m 82)The first Ryan film, a tighter machine with Connery’s submarine captain at its centre.

  5. Michael Clayton (2007, Fi1m 86)Another thriller in which the deadliest scenes are conversations in expensive offices.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever