Paul Safranek (Matt Damon) and Audrey Safranek (Kristen Wiig) with colleagues around a miniature building model
Film review

Downsizing

2017 · Directed by Alexander Payne · 2h 15m

In a sentenceMatt Damon shrinks to five inches and finds his problems have kept their original dimensions

Omaha, Nebraska, in the near future. Norwegian scientists led by Dr. Jorgen Asbjørnsen (Rolf Lassgård) have found a way to shrink a human being to five inches, and sell it as a cure for overcrowding. Paul Safranek (Matt Damon) cannot afford the home his wife Audrey (Kristen Wiig) wants. An old friend, Dave Johnson (Jason Sudeikis), has already gone small and explains that their savings would make them rich in Leisureland, a community built for small people. The Safraneks sign up. The first act follows the sales pitch, the paperwork, the shaving, the fillings coming out, and the moment Paul wakes up small and learns who has joined him and who has not.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Alexander Payne shrinks a mild Nebraskan to five inches and, for an hour, makes the funniest and most exact comedy of his career. Then the film forgets how small he is, and drifts. Hong Chau holds it together as long as anyone could.

Alexander Payne has spent his career on ordinary American men, finding them a little ridiculous and a little sad. Downsizing gives him a new instrument: a Norwegian laboratory that shrinks people to five inches, so that Paul Safranek (Matt Damon), who cannot afford a bigger house, can move to a domed community called Leisureland and live like a millionaire. The first hour is the best comedy Payne has made in years. The second is a gentler, vaguer film that has mislaid its own idea. We would still send you to it, with reservations.

The first hour works because Payne and his co-writer Jim Taylor treat the premise as paperwork. There is a sales pitch, a contract, a medical. The shrinking itself is a procedure: patients are shaved from head to foot, their fillings are pulled, they are wheeled in rows into a white room, and afterwards nurses lift them off the beds with spatulas. Kevin Tent cuts it as a run of small indignities, and we laughed harder than at anything of Payne’s since Sideways. Jason Sudeikis, as the old friend who has gone small and cannot stop selling it, is exactly the right kind of pleased with himself.

Stefania Cella designs Leisureland as a golf estate under a mesh roof, all beige McMansions and pool furniture, and it looks like any other American suburb until a full-sized rose arrives in a vase the height of a man. Phedon Papamichael keeps finding those frames: a vodka bottle the size of a water tower, a single cracker carried like a tray. The film is funniest when it trusts the effects and says nothing.

The second movement belongs to Christoph Waltz. Dusan Mirkovic lives upstairs from Paul, throws parties that shake the ceiling, and imports cigars and cognac with his friend Konrad (Udo Kier), who says almost nothing and is the better for it. Waltz plays a man who chose to be small so that his pleasures would be proportionally larger, and he is having a wonderful time. Then his cleaner walks in.

Hong Chau plays Ngoc Lan Tran, a Vietnamese dissident shrunk against her will, who arrived in America in a television box and now cleans Leisureland’s flats on one leg and a bad prosthetic. She speaks in barked, broken imperatives, and some critics flinched; the accent is broad and the film is not always sure whether it is laughing with her or at her. But Chau does not play a stereotype. She plays a person impatient because there is work to do, and she is the only character who wants anything. When she leads Paul through a service door in the dome wall to the tenement where the small poor live, in bunk beds stacked under a single lightbulb, we felt the film sharpen, then look away.

That is the trouble with the last hour. Payne loses interest in size. Once Paul is through the wall the scale gags stop, and what remains is a passive man being told what to do by more interesting people. Damon is good at bewilderment, but 135 minutes is a long time to be bewildered, and the script never gives Paul a want of his own. The final stretch leaves Leisureland and goes somewhere we will not describe. It is where the film says what it means, and what it means is less interesting than shrinking people.

Rolfe Kent’s score is a light, plucked thing that suits the first hour and is asked to carry too much in the second. Wendy Chuck dresses the small rich exactly like the large rich, which is the point, and dresses Ngoc Lan in other people’s cast-offs, which is a better one.

Against Payne’s other films this is the odd one. About Schmidt and Nebraska knew how much to say and stopped. Downsizing has more ideas than either and keeps changing its mind about which one it is for. See it for the procedure, for Waltz’s parties, and for Chau, who deserved a film that kept looking at her. It carries a 15 and runs 135 minutes, and the first sixty are the ones you will remember.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

62
Positive
14
Mixed
10
Negative
4

Most critics like Downsizing, though rarely with much heat. The reviews agree the premise is a good one and that the first hour, in which Alexander Payne works out the logistics of shrinking people and the sight gags that follow, is the film at its sharpest. Almost everyone praises Hong Chau, whose Ngoc Lan is repeatedly called the film’s emotional centre, and the production design of the miniature world draws steady credit.

The reservations cluster on the second half. Once the film settles into its small world, many critics say it drops the conceit that made it interesting and turns preachy or sentimental, with a tone that lurches between satire and sincerity. The spread is wide: The Hollywood Reporter finds it deeply humane, while Time Out and Slant think it timid and self-satisfied. The Guardian splits within a single review, admiring the opening and finding the rest smaller than hoped.

The Hollywood Reporter
30 August 2017 · festival review · Todd McCarthy
90*

The critic calls it a captivating, funny and deeply humane film that transforms a sci-fi shrinking conceit into a timely yet timeless exploration of humanity's long-term viability on the planet without preachiness.

Read the full review →
The Times
25 January 2018
80*

The critic praises Alexander Payne’s sci-fi comedy for its surprising compassion and kindness beneath the satire, noting that it moves beyond typical misanthropy to show the emotional education of its everyman hero. It highlights the credible layering of fantasy with social satire and strong character work.

Read the full review →
Empire
23 January 2018 · Ian Freer
75*

Payne blends satire, sci-fi and emotion in an ambitious high-concept film that wrings comedic, political and emotional gold from the miniaturisation premise, with strong visual effects and inventive details. Hong Chau delivers a terrific, scene-stealing performance, though some big intentions remain unrealised.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
26 January 2018 · Matthew Norman
70*

The critic praises the brilliant premise of shrinking humans but finds the film hard to pigeonhole as it zigzags between genres and meanders thematically. Hong Chau's intense performance as Ngoc Lan stands out as the emotional heart, and the story ultimately resolves as a simple tale of altruism and romantic love.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
70*

The critic praises Payne’s whimsical sci-fi take on inequality and capitalism, highlighting strong visual storytelling and social critique through intricate jokes and character work. It notes some imperfections but commends the film’s commitment to real-world issues.

Read the full review →
Little White Lies
31 August 2017 · festival review · Ed Gibbs
70*

The critic notes Payne's gentle satire on the state of America and planet's future, praising the scope and double narrative despite bumpy tone and not fully convincing on climate issues.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Downsizing worth watching?
Downsizing is worth watching for its first hour, which is the funniest and most exact comedy Alexander Payne has made in years, and we scored it 60. The second hour forgets how small Matt Damon is and drifts, so see it for the shrinking procedure, Christoph Waltz's parties and Hong Chau, and expect to remember the opening sixty minutes rather than the last seventy-five.
How long is Downsizing, and what is it rated?
Downsizing runs 2h 15m. It is a drama and science fiction film.
Where can I watch Downsizing in Chile?
Downsizing is streaming on Paramount+, Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV in Chile, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from CLF 1.49. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Downsizing, and is it suitable for children?
Downsizing carries a UK 15 certificate and is not for children, though it is a comedy rather than anything frightening. The review notes no violence to speak of; the certificate reflects adult language, drink and cigars at Christoph Waltz's parties, and a hard look at poverty in the tenements behind the dome wall. The squeamish should brace for shaved heads and pulled fillings.
How does Downsizing compare to The Lobster?
Downsizing and The Lobster both take one absurd social rule with a straight face, but The Lobster follows its idea to the end while Downsizing loses interest in size halfway through. Both are sharpest early and slacken later; The Lobster is the bleaker and more consistent film, Downsizing the warmer and broader, with bigger laughs in its first hour.
What should I watch after Downsizing?
After Downsizing, try The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957, Fi1m 86): The original small-man film, and far bleaker about what being small means. Then The Lobster (2015, Fi1m 78): A mad social rule taken with a straight face, and followed to the end; and Sorry to Bother You (2018, Fi1m 81): Another satire of work and money that takes a wild turn; this one commits.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Incredible Shrinking Man (1957, Fi1m 86)The original small-man film, and far bleaker about what being small means.

  2. The Lobster (2015, Fi1m 78)A mad social rule taken with a straight face, and followed to the end.

  3. Sorry to Bother You (2018, Fi1m 81)Another satire of work and money that takes a wild turn; this one commits.

  4. About Schmidt (2002, Fi1m 77)Payne’s earlier Nebraskan everyman, no shrinking required, and the sharper film for it.

  5. Ikiru (1952, Fi1m 92)Kurosawa’s clerk learns late to be useful; the film Paul Safranek needed to see.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever