Film review

Eastern Promises

2007 · Directed by David Cronenberg · 1h 40m · MPA R

In a sentenceViggo Mortensen makes standing still look like something the police ought to investigate

ThrillerCrimeMystery

A midwife becomes entangled with a Russian mob family in London. Naomi Watts plays Anna Ivanovna Khitrova, whose attempt to pass on a diary brings her into contact with Semyon (Armin Mueller-Stahl). Around them are Nikolai Luzhin (Viggo Mortensen) and Kirill (Vincent Cassel), men caught up in a criminal world governed by loyalty, masculine honour and the threat of violence. As Anna approaches this family, she encounters people whose intentions she cannot easily read. David Cronenberg directs this crime thriller from a screenplay by Steven Knight.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

David Cronenberg’s Eastern Promises is a tense, bruising crime thriller built around Viggo Mortensen’s watchfulness. The plotting can feel second-hand, but the violence is frightening and the people committing it remain difficult to dismiss.

David Cronenberg’s Eastern Promises is a good crime thriller with a performance that makes it worth tolerating some familiar plotting. Steven Knight’s screenplay brings a midwife into contact with London’s Russian underworld, a setup that could easily serve a more routine exercise in criminal menace. Cronenberg is interested in the men inside that world and the rules they enforce on one another. He gives their bodies and their wary dealings enough attention to make the story’s occasional clumsiness frustrating.

Viggo Mortensen plays Nikolai Luzhin with a watchfulness that never feels empty. He makes it possible to suspect calculation in his restraint while still allowing some humanity to register, without asking us to relax around him. His stillness also gives the other actors something useful to push against. Nikolai holds our attention because Mortensen makes us consider what a man might need to conceal in company like this.

Naomi Watts plays Anna with a directness that gives us a way into this guarded company, though Knight gives her less to work with than Mortensen. Her encounter with Armin Mueller-Stahl’s Semyon, when she brings him the diary, is particularly effective. We felt uneasy watching his polite attention to her; Mueller-Stahl makes it difficult to tell how much reassurance is safe to accept. Vincent Cassel’s Kirill adds a more restless presence, although the writing sometimes settles for a recognisable type. These are capable performances working with uneven material.

Peter Suschitzky’s cinematography keeps the faces and bodies worth studying even when the dialogue is doing ordinary thriller work. The framing gives the men an uncomfortable physical presence, and the emphasis on tattoos makes their rules of belonging visible on the skin. Carol Spier’s production design helps make this corner of London feel closed off, somewhere Anna can enter without ever being welcome. That enclosure serves the unease well, though it also leaves the surrounding city feeling distant.

Ronald Sanders’s editing allows the deliberate pace to become threatening, holding our attention on people whose next move is hard to judge. When the violence arrives, the bodily damage is difficult to treat as a passing excitement. Howard Shore’s score supports the apprehension without making these men seem grand, a useful restraint in a film already so intent on their physical presence. Some stretches are stiff, but the film’s 100 minutes leave little room for the self-importance that can make gangster stories such a long evening.

The weakness is Knight’s reliance on familiar criminal types and plotting that occasionally feels too convenient. The dialogue is sometimes clumsy enough to distract from the suspicion the actors have worked to establish. The uneasy intimacy between these men is more interesting than the business of moving the story onwards. Cronenberg gives their attraction to one another room to complicate their professions of loyalty, finding something troubling in the company they insist on keeping.

Crime-thriller viewers willing to forgive some blunt writing should give this the evening. Mortensen rewards close attention, especially when Nikolai appears to be doing little at all. The violence is a fair reason to choose something else, and the film does not soften it for anyone’s comfort. This is poor company for a meal.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

71
Positive
7
Mixed
6
Negative
0

Most critics find Eastern Promises an absorbing, unsettling gangster thriller, with praise concentrated on Viggo Mortensen’s watchful performance and David Cronenberg’s controlled direction. Mortensen’s combination of menace, restraint and humanity draws approval even from reviewers who find the film disappointing. The violence supplies memorable shocks, while the attention to bodies and tattoos gives several critics more to consider than the criminal intrigue alone. The stronger notices also find tenderness and moral unease beneath the brutality.

The main disagreement concerns how much Cronenberg brings to a familiar story. Some reviews find the plotting conventional, the dialogue awkward and the supporting characters too dependent on stereotypes. The New York Times sees deliberate pacing and estrangement making the material troubling; The New Yorker finds the atmosphere airless and the violence excessive. The spread runs from enthusiastic praise to substantial reservations, though even the cooler reviews usually identify a performance or sequence worth admiring.

Slant Magazine
5 September 2007 · ★★★½/4 · Ed Gonzalez
88

The critic praises Cronenberg's exquisite framing and contemplation of codes of masculine honor as deliciously transgressive, while noting the story is clearer and more straightforward than recent prior works. It singles out the homoerotic tension and bodily focus for praise amid some stereotypical elements.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
10 September 2007 · festival review
80*

The critic calls it a brutal yet surprisingly tender thriller that Cronenberg makes entirely his own as an auteur, with a taut Hitchcockian narrative, terrific performances and classically controlled direction that should appeal beyond his usual fans.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 September 2007 · A.O. Scott
80*

The critic describes the film as a grim and violent story of London's Russian underworld that Cronenberg turns into something genuinely troubling through his mastery of estrangement, deliberate pacing, and focus on social and ethical implications.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
13 September 2007 · B · Keith Phipps
77

The critic finds the film an engaging thriller with cool intensity and memorable shocks and acting turns, but notes it lacks Cronenberg's usual depth and feels unexpectedly bloodless overall, with a strong fight scene standing out.

Read the full review →
The Independent
25 October 2007
65*

The critic finds the film an intriguing but somewhat mechanical gangster noir that feels staid in pacing and direction overall. They single out Viggo Mortensen's watchfully charismatic lead performance as the standout element, along with a couple of daring, memorable set pieces.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 October 2007 · Peter Bradshaw
60*

Cronenberg's tale of Russian gangsters in London lacks the boldness of his best work despite strong performances and intriguing scenes like the bathhouse fight and tattooing ritual. The script feels clunky and inauthentic at times, evoking a feature-length episode of The Bill rather than fully delivering on its potential.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 2008

Nominated
Best Actor

If you liked this, try…