A crowd marches along a cobbled street carrying a Polish flag
Film review

Man of Iron

1981 · Directed by Andrzej Wajda · 2h 27m

In a sentenceA drunk with a tape recorder is sent to smear a strike leader, and the shipyard will not stop for either of them

Gdańsk, August 1980. The Lenin Shipyard is on strike and the gates are shut. In Warsaw, Winkel (Marian Opania), a radio journalist who drinks, is sent north by the deputy head of the Radio Committee (Janusz Gajos) with a tape recorder and a brief: find something to discredit Maciek Tomczyk (Jerzy Radziwiłowicz), a strike leader and the son of Mateusz Birkut, the bricklayer made a hero of labour and discarded. Badecki (Franciszek Trzeciak) briefs him at his hotel. Winkel finds Dzidek (Bogusław Linda), who knew Maciek as a student, and Mrs Hulewicz (Irena Byrska), in whose flat Maciek once lodged. Their stories go back to 1968, to the shipyard dead of December 1970, and to Agnieszka (Krystyna Janda), who went looking for the father and married the son.

Fi1m review

Andrzej Wajda’s follow-up to Man of Marble was made in a hurry, in the middle of the events it describes, and it shows in both directions. The framing story creaks; the flashbacks to 1970 and the footage from the shipyard gates do not.

Andrzej Wajda made Man of Marble in 1977 about Mateusz Birkut, a Nowa Huta bricklayer built up as a hero of labour and then thrown away. He made Man of Iron four years later, quickly, while the events it describes were still going on. The shipyard strike at Gdańsk in August 1980 gave him his setting and his archive; the state, for a few months, gave him permission. The result is part fiction, part newsreel and part pamphlet, and we would rather have it, rough edges and all, than most tidier films about revolutions made a safe twenty years afterwards.

The way in is Winkel (Marian Opania), a radio journalist who used to be good and now drinks. His superiors send him to Gdańsk with a tape recorder and a task: dig up anything that might discredit Maciek Tomczyk (Jerzy Radziwiłowicz), the strike leader who is also Birkut’s son. It is a serviceable device and Aleksander Ścibor-Rylski’s script leans on it harder than it can bear. People who have every reason not to talk to a man from state radio sit him down and tell him the last twelve years in order. Opania is good enough that we forgive most of it. He plays Winkel’s shame as a physical thing, a man who cannot get a bottle open with steady hands and knows exactly what that looks like.

The stories he collects are the film. They go back to 1968, when Maciek was a student and his father would not join the protests, and to December 1970, when the shipyard workers marched and the father went out and the son stayed home. Radziwiłowicz plays both men, and he does it without a trick: Birkut is settled and heavy, Maciek narrow and watchful, and the distance between them is what the film is about. Edward Klosinski shoots the 1970 material in flat grey daylight with a hand-held camera, so that it sits beside the real newsreel without embarrassment. The sequence around Birkut’s death and the burial that follows, a family trying to find out where the state has put a body, is the strongest thing here, and Halina Prugar-Ketling cuts it slowly, on faces, where a lesser editor would have gone for the crowd.

Then there is the footage itself. The film uses material shot inside the shipyard during the strike and keeps returning to the gate: flowers tied to the railings, a photograph of the Pope, a crowd standing in the rain waiting for news. We were moved more than we expected by these shots, and we should be honest that the film has borrowed the feeling from history rather than made it. That is not a complaint. Wajda knew what he had and does not tart it up. Andrzej Korzyński’s music stays out of the archive for the most part, and when Lech Wałęsa turns up inside the fiction, as a witness at a wedding, he is filmed like any other guest.

Krystyna Janda’s Agnieszka, who drove Man of Marble, has less to do here. She is in custody for most of the running time, and her one long scene, across a table in a visiting room, is the moment we most wished the film had been built around her rather than Winkel. Bogusław Linda’s Dzidek and Irena Byrska’s Mrs Hulewicz, who lets rooms and remembers everything, carry their flashbacks with more life than the hotel scenes around them.

Wajda is not a subtle polemicist and does not pretend to be. Everyone in authority is a coward, a drunk or a thug, and Franciszek Trzeciak’s Badecki and Andrzej Seweryn’s Captain Wirski are given little to play beyond the job. Allan Starski’s hotel rooms and offices, brown and beige and hung with heavy curtains, say more about that side of the story than the dialogue does. There are speeches, and one or two are delivered more or less to camera. At 147 minutes it is long, and the middle hour repeats itself.

Set against Man of Marble, this is the rougher film. That one was built; this one was grabbed. Watch them in order if you can, and do not expect Man of Iron to tell you how the story ends. It could not. It was finished before anyone knew.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

1 of 6
Positive
1
Mixed
0
Negative
0
Variety
31 December 1980 · Variety Staff
75*

The review presents the film as an urgent, passionate record of Polish history, with its actors praised for their natural performances. It particularly singles out the scenes recounting the death and burial of Birkut as especially strong.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Man of Iron worth watching?
Man of Iron is worth watching for anyone interested in the Gdańsk strike of 1980 or in Andrzej Wajda, and we scored it 78. The framing story about a drunk radio journalist creaks and the middle hour repeats itself, but the 1970 flashbacks and the real shipyard footage are strong enough to carry the 147 minutes.
How long is Man of Iron, and what is it rated?
Man of Iron runs 2h 27m. It is a drama and history film.
Where can I watch Man of Iron in Germany?
Man of Iron is not on any streaming or rental service in Germany at the moment. It is available in 1 other country; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How does Man of Iron compare to Man of Marble?
Man of Iron is the rougher and weaker of the two, and Man of Marble is the film to see first. The earlier one was built carefully around Agnieszka's investigation; this one was grabbed in the middle of the events it describes, so it gains in newsreel force what it loses in construction. Watch them in order.
What should I watch after Man of Iron?
After Man of Iron, try Man of Marble (1977, Fi1m 86): The first half of the story, and the better-made film; watch it first. Then Z (1969, Fi1m 84): Costa-Gavras on how a state tidies away a body; fast, angry and clear.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1982

Nominated
Best International Feature Film

International Submission to the Academy Awards, 1982

Nominated
International Submission to the Academy Awards

Cannes Film Festival, 1981

Won
Palme d'Or

If you liked this, try…

  1. Man of Marble (1977, Fi1m 86)The first half of the story, and the better-made film; watch it first.

  2. Interrogation (1982) · not on Fi1m yetKrystyna Janda in a cell for two hours; made the same year, banned for seven.

  3. The Battle of Chile (1975) · not on Fi1m yetA revolution filmed as it happened, with no actors to get in the way.

  4. Medium Cool (1969) · not on Fi1m yetA newsman wanders into Chicago 1968 and the fiction stops being able to keep up.

  5. Z (1969, Fi1m 84)Costa-Gavras on how a state tidies away a body; fast, angry and clear.

Man of Iron (1981) review: a rushed, angry dispatch from Gdańsk (Germany) | Fi1m