Film review

Mission: Impossible

1996 · Directed by Brian De Palma · 1h 51m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceTom Cruise hangs from a wire and makes sitting still feel like a dangerous occupation

AdventureActionThriller

Ethan Hunt (Tom Cruise) is a spy trying to protect a list of secret agents. His work involves gadgets, disguises and a succession of complications in which appearances offer little certainty. Jon Voight plays Jim Phelps, Emmanuelle Béart is Claire and Henry Czerny is Kittridge, with Jean Reno as Krieger and Ving Rhames as Luther. Vanessa Redgrave also appears. Brian De Palma directs an action thriller that follows Hunt through covert operations and elaborate physical challenges, as the business of protecting secret identities becomes increasingly difficult.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Brian De Palma’s spy thriller is tense, ingenious entertainment, with Tom Cruise making its elaborate schemes feel urgent. The screenplay makes a simple task needlessly difficult to follow, but the set-pieces are worth the trouble.

Brian De Palma gets the important part of Mission: Impossible right: he makes us worry about how a job can possibly be done. This is an absorbing spy thriller, even when David Koepp and Robert Towne’s screenplay makes the job itself harder to grasp than it needs to be. Ethan Hunt has a list of secret agents to protect, which ought to be enough trouble for anyone. Gadgets, disguises and complications accumulate around that straightforward premise, but the film earns our patience whenever De Palma settles down to stage a physical problem.

Tom Cruise plays Ethan Hunt with a concentration that makes the gadgets and disguises seem like tools somebody might actually rely on. His seriousness is useful even when the plot becomes faintly ridiculous, because he never appears to be waiting for us to applaud the cleverness of it all. Vanessa Redgrave offers a welcome change of manner: she brings amusement to a film otherwise rather concerned with looking purposeful. The pleasure of her performance is how little effort it seems to take.

The wire-suspended vault burglary is where that concentration pays off. We held our breath at the sight of Cruise hanging there; after so much explanation, the precarious position of one body is enough. Stephen H. Burum’s cinematography lets us study the difficulty of the manoeuvre, and Norman Reynolds’s production design makes the vault feel forbiddingly controlled. The setting does useful dramatic work: it looks like a place that will not accommodate a mistake.

Paul Hirsch’s editing makes the suspense last without wearing it out, allowing the practical difficulty to hold our attention. A sequence like this needs pauses as much as movement, and the cuts do not keep demanding that we admire the cutting. Danny Elfman’s score keeps pressing the urgency, sometimes harder than the action needs. The film can generate enough tension by leaving Hunt to negotiate a difficult manoeuvre, and the musical encouragement feels less necessary than the careful cutting.

Koepp and Towne are less successful with the people who have to live inside their complications. With Jon Voight as Jim Phelps, Emmanuelle Béart as Claire and Ving Rhames as Luther, the cast promises more human interest than the writing supplies. The film gives us plenty to keep track of without always giving us enough reason to care. That is a limitation, and the skill of the action cannot quite remove it.

For a spy thriller, this is a pleasingly patient film about getting a dangerous job done. De Palma allows an elaborate piece of action to develop instead of treating its preparation as something to hurry through. The larger set-pieces are enjoyable, but the vault burglary gives the clearest sense of his skill: we understand enough to worry, and have time to do so. At 111 minutes, the film does not need to rush past its most interesting business.

Watch it when there is no need to keep one eye on anything else. Interruptions will do the plot no favours, and the careful staging deserves the attention. Keep the conversation for afterwards; there will be a few things to check.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

2 of 6
Positive
2
Mixed
0
Negative
0
Empire
1 January 2000 · Mark Salisbury
80*

The critic calls it a summer blockbuster that delivers with gadgets, disguises, and De Palma's masterful set-pieces like the wire-suspended vault sequence. The convoluted plot is forgiven because the film is enormous fun overall.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

Cruise and De Palma deliver a thrilling extravaganza of jaw-dropping effects and stunts; forget the complicated plot and enjoy the epic rollercoaster, especially the vault burglary and helicopter pursuit sequences.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
21 May 1996 · Kevin Thomas

The film has lots going for it including Cruise's charisma, De Palma's sleek direction, a first-rate cast and superb suspense sequences capped by a breathtaking climax stunt. The script is mercifully simple at heart despite its spy plot complexities.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 July 1996 · José Arroyo

The critic finds the film glamorous, exciting, sexy and sometimes witty with indelible visual moments, but gleefully superficial and lacking depth or coherence. It belongs to a history of cinema of attractions, offering spectacle and set-pieces that assault the senses.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
21 May 1996 · David Hunter

The critic finds the film dour and only fitfully entertaining, with a dreary script and half-baked characters that take themselves too seriously despite some strong actors being underutilized. The climactic train sequence provides crowd-pleasing fireworks, and performances like Vanessa Redgrave's stand out.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
27 May 1996 · Terrence Rafferty

De Palma makes action-movie magic with ingenious craftsmanship that elevates the big-budget film beyond crude entertainment. The director's strengths turn the script's commercial strategies into a dense, formally complex visual experience.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Japan Academy Prize for Outstanding Foreign Language Film, 1997

Nominated
Japan Academy Prize for Outstanding Foreign Language Film

MTV Movie Award for Best Action Sequence, 1997

Nominated
MTV Movie Award for Best Action Sequence

Satellite Award for Best Editing, 1997

Nominated
Satellite Award for Best Editing

If you liked this, try…

The 39 Steps poster

The 39 Steps

1935 · For another spy chase where staying alive requires thinking quickly.

Le Cercle Rouge poster

Le Cercle Rouge

1970 · For a carefully staged robbery that rewards attention to small movements.

The Conversation poster

The Conversation

1974 · For surveillance suspense that makes listening as dangerous as running.

Sneakers poster

Sneakers

1992 · For gadgets, professional bluffing and a team allowed some warmth.

Ronin poster

Ronin

1998 · For professionals under pressure, uncertain loyalties and car chases with weight.