Godzilla battles a giant praying mantis as another monster approaches across rocky terrain
Film review

Son of Godzilla

1967 · Directed by Jun Fukuda · 1h 26m

In a sentenceGiant mantises, a weather machine and a monster toddler blowing smoke rings; the toddler gives the best performance

A remote tropical island. A team of Japanese scientists led by Dr. Tsunezo Kusumi (Tadao Takashima) is testing a way to control the weather, to turn jungle into farmland. The first experiment is days away and the heat is already unbearable. A reporter, Goro Maki (Akira Kubo), parachutes in uninvited and is put to work as the cook. Fujisaki (Akihiko Hirata) runs the instruments, the radio keeps picking up a signal nobody can explain, and a young woman, Saeko Matsumiya (Bibari Maeda), is living alone somewhere in the trees. Then the test goes wrong. A radioactive storm cooks the island, the praying mantises grow to the size of houses, and they dig up an egg. Something inside is crying for its father.

Fi1m review

Jun Fukuda gives Godzilla a child and a tropical island and finds a few minutes of real charm in the pair of them. The rest is scientists arguing about the weather while the wire-worked mantises wait their turn.

Jun Fukuda’s Son of Godzilla is the eighth Godzilla picture and the first in which the monster is asked to be a parent. Shinichi Sekizawa and Kazue Kiba’s script strands a team of weather scientists on a tropical island, hatches a baby out of an egg, and brings Godzilla wading in to raise it. It runs 86 minutes and carries a U certificate, and both facts tell you who it is for. This is a children’s film, made by people who knew the children had arrived and decided to meet them halfway. About a third of it is a small pleasure. The rest is a long afternoon in a hot laboratory.

The laboratory is the problem. Tadao Takashima plays Kusumi as a decent, tired man in a sweat-stained shirt, and Akira Kubo’s reporter Goro Maki is there to be told off and handed a frying pan. Akihiko Hirata, Kenji Sahara and Yoshio Tsuchiya fill out the team, and Tsuchiya gets the one strand of human drama, a man coming apart in the heat, which he plays larger than the film can hold. Bibari Maeda’s Saeko, a girl who has grown up alone on the island, is written as a mystery and photographed as a swimsuit. A good deal of the running time is these people arguing about barometric pressure. We were bored, and then we were bored with a wristwatch, counting the minutes to the next monster.

The monsters mostly pay off. The giant mantises are the best thing here, and it is not close. They are puppets worked on wires, all elbows and twitching heads, and when three of them pick at the egg in the red light of the storm, the scale and the movement look right. A second creature arrives in the back half, and we will leave you to meet it, but its attack on the camp is the one sequence in which Fukuda finds something like menace.

The son is another matter. The baby is a wrinkled, big-eyed thing with the proportions of a toddler in a nappy, and it makes a noise like a donkey with a grievance. It is meant to be adorable and it is faintly horrible. And yet there is a scene in which Godzilla, wanting the child to breathe fire, stamps on its tail; the child coughs out a smoke ring, and Godzilla looks briefly and unmistakably disappointed. We laughed, then felt slightly ashamed of ourselves, then found we were watching the two of them with something close to fondness. Fukuda holds the shots long and lets the suits play it as pantomime, and it works because nobody rushes it.

Kazuo Yamada shoots the island in bleached daylight, so the jungle looks like a studio floor with palms stuck in it, which it is, and then finds real colour in the storm, orange and violet skies over black rock. Takeo Kita’s sets are a corrugated hut, a lab bench and a radio room, and they do not pretend to be more. The suits, credited to Nobuyuki Yasumaru, Teizô Toshimitsu and Yasuei Yagi, let the film down at the top: this Godzilla has a broad, doughy face and wide, friendly eyes, and looks less like a force of nature than a large man in a wetsuit who has been told to be kind. Masaru Satō’s score is jaunty, brass and hand percussion, closer to a beach picture than a horror, and it is honest about what the film is. Ryôhei Fujii cuts the fights at walking pace, and they run on longer than the puppetry can support.

The 1954 Godzilla was a film about a bombed country. Thirteen years on, the same monster is teaching his child to blow smoke rings, and you can either be cross about that or accept that a series has to become something else to survive. Fukuda’s film is at its most comfortable when it stops pretending the humans matter.

Watch it with a child of about seven, who will not mind the scientists and will love the smoke rings. Watch it alone and you have twenty-five good minutes of puppets in eighty-six, and a Godzilla who looks as though he would rather be somewhere cooler.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

2 of 6
Positive
0
Mixed
1
Negative
1
Time Out
· ATu
64*

Time Out identifies this as a review, but the accessible page provides no critical verdict. The available text gives only plot details, so no praise or complaint can be reliably attributed to the critic.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★ · Alan Jones
40

Jones considers the eighth Toho monster film an inept juvenile adventure. He criticizes its comical episodes and miniature-effects mayhem.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Son of Godzilla worth watching?
Son of Godzilla is worth watching mainly for children of about seven and for anyone fond of the series' sillier years, and we scored it 57. The wire-worked mantises and the smoke-ring scene between Godzilla and his child are a real pleasure; the long stretches of scientists arguing about the weather are not. Adults watching alone get about twenty-five good minutes in eighty-six.
How long is Son of Godzilla, and what is it rated?
Son of Godzilla runs 1h 26m. It is an adventure and science fiction film.
Where can I watch Son of Godzilla in India?
Son of Godzilla is not on any streaming or rental service in India at the moment. It is available in 2 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How does Son of Godzilla compare to Godzilla?
Son of Godzilla is a children's film in colour about a monster raising a toddler; the 1954 Godzilla is a grim black-and-white film about a bombed country. The original is the better and more serious picture, frightening where this one is jaunty. Choose the original for a monster that means something, and the sequel for puppets, pantomime and a small child on the sofa.
What should I watch after Son of Godzilla?
After Son of Godzilla, try Godzilla (1954, Fi1m 88): The original, before the children arrived: grim, black-and-white, and about something. Then King Kong (1933, Fi1m 88): The island, the egg-sized beasts and the puppetry this film is descended from; and The Iron Giant (1999, Fi1m 88): A monster learning to be a child’s friend, handled with more care than here.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Godzilla (1954, Fi1m 88)The original, before the children arrived: grim, black-and-white, and about something.

  2. Mothra (1961) · not on Fi1m yetToho’s gentlest monster, with an island, a song and real colour.

  3. King Kong (1933, Fi1m 88)The island, the egg-sized beasts and the puppetry this film is descended from.

  4. The Iron Giant (1999, Fi1m 88)A monster learning to be a child’s friend, handled with more care than here.

  5. Shin Godzilla (2016, Fi1m 74)The series grown up again: committees, spreadsheets and a monster that keeps changing.