Airmen lift a grinning officer in flight gear above a cheering crowd
Series review

Masters of the Air

2024 · Created by John Orloff · Series

In a sentenceThe cockpits are terrifying, though several of the men inside could still use an introduction

Maj. Gale ‘Buck’ Cleven (Austin Butler) and Maj. John ‘Bucky’ Egan (Callum Turner) face repeated combat missions alongside fellow airman Harry Crosby (Anthony Boyle). Their immediate task is to carry out each assignment and return alive, working in confined cockpits while enemy fire threatens the aircraft around them. Away from the fighting, friendships and the strain of service occupy men whose next assignment will send them back into the air. This nine-episode war drama follows the airmen through combat and the psychological demands that extend beyond each mission.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Masters of the Air makes aerial combat frighteningly immediate, but struggles to make its crowded cast equally distinct. The repetitive storytelling and reverent tone make this a qualified recommendation for those particularly drawn to war drama.

Masters of the Air is worth considering for its frightening aerial combat, though the drama between missions is much less dependable. Across nine episodes, creator John Orloff asks us to live with airmen whose work repeatedly puts them in mortal danger. The attacks make that danger painfully clear, but the series struggles to give everyone caught in them a distinct personality. We would recommend it chiefly to those already interested in war drama, with patience for an ensemble that takes too long to settle.

The cockpit sequences are the reason to stay. Cinematographers Adam Arkapaw, David Franco, Richard Rutkowski and Jac Fitzgerald convey confinement even during action taking place in open sky. We were frightened by the fighting inside those cramped, bloodied compartments, where the men have so little space in which to react. The close quarters and forceful sound give the combat an immediate physical threat that survives the occasional distracting gloss of the images.

Austin Butler and Callum Turner give the crowded ensemble an initial point of focus as Maj. Gale ‘Buck’ Cleven and Maj. John ‘Bucky’ Egan. Both have the presence to hold our attention before the writing has properly established the friendship. That is useful, but the series relies on it for too long, asking us to supply affection that the early episodes have not quite earned. Anthony Boyle, as Harry Crosby, helps, although even a capable cast cannot make every supporting airman memorable.

The editing is shared by Billy Rich, Markus Czyzewski, Mark Sanger, Carmen Morrow, Saar Klein and Spencer Averick. The combat has urgency, but the repeated missions give the larger story a rhythm that becomes predictable. The opening episodes introduce more people than the writing can distinguish, so we are still placing faces when scenes require concern. A little less haste between attacks would have helped us recognise who is flying into the next one.

Chris Seagers’s production design helps enormously: the cockpits feel like working spaces that have become dangerous to occupy. Their cramped construction contributes more to the tension than the broader views of aircraft in flight. There are nevertheless stretches where the handsome presentation makes war look more attractive than the drama appears to intend. Blake Neely’s music adds to the reverence, and we sometimes wished for less encouragement to admire men whose courage is already clear.

The series becomes more affecting when it spends time on the psychological suffering beyond combat. It is easier to care about the airmen once their suffering has consequences beyond the next mission. The familiar war-drama task of making a group of uniforms into separate people begins to feel properly addressed, though some supporting characters remain indistinct. We wanted more of that attention earlier, when the sight of men under fire was doing so much of the emotional work.

We would not choose this for an unsparing examination of wartime morality. The respectful tone seldom permits much questioning of heroism, even when the fighting itself is appalling. If aerial combat is what draws you to a war drama, allow for a slower acquaintance with the men.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

68
Positive
12
Mixed
3
Negative
3

Most critics respond positively to Masters of the Air, with praise clustering around its aerial combat rather than its storytelling. The reviews repeatedly single out the claustrophobic cockpits, tense flying sequences and convincing sense of danger; even several detractors find the combat harrowing. The ensemble also earns praise, while the more enthusiastic assessments find emotional weight in the airmen’s lives beyond their missions and the psychological suffering that follows them home.

Opinion varies widely on whether the drama gives those men enough depth. The AV Club praises its humanising attention to their lives and trauma, while Digital Spy finds thin characterisation and a glib treatment of casualties. Elsewhere, reservations centre on repetitive missions, overcrowded opening episodes and supporting roles that barely develop. Several critics also question the glossy or triumphalist presentation of war, leaving broad agreement about the combat scenes but considerably less about the series around them.

Radio Times
24 January 2024 · James Hibbs
90*

Hibbs presents the series as exceptional television and a remarkable achievement. The standfirst singles out its unprecedented impact on the small screen.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
24 January 2024 · Kayleigh Dray
90*

The review strongly recommends the miniseries as a brutal, beautiful and powerful depiction of war. It especially praises the show for humanizing the real airmen and exploring their lives and traumas beyond combat.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
24 January 2024 · ★★★★ · Nick Howells
80

Howells finds the series highly watchable, with its aerial action making it soar. He praises the nerve-shredding cinematography but finds the characters too one-dimensional.

Read the full review →
The Independent
26 January 2024 · ★★★★ · Nick Hilton
80

Hilton finds the series compelling overall, though its glossy presentation sometimes glamorises war. He praises the ensemble and the pulse-quickening aerial action, while wishing for a more naturalistic approach.

Read the full review →
Empire
24 January 2024 · John Nugent
75*

The review finds the series stirring and gripping, despite some quibbles and a triumphalist American perspective. It particularly praises the tense, confidently staged flying sequences and the emotional scale of the ensemble drama.

Read the full review →
Variety
26 January 2024 · Aramide Tinubu
75*

Tinubu finds the series massive, beautifully rendered, and a powerful account of war’s human cost, though its opening episodes are overcrowded and disorienting. She especially praises its later focus on soldiers’ psychological suffering and the Tuskegee Airmen.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Masters of the Air worth watching?
Masters of the Air is worth considering for war-drama enthusiasts drawn to frightening aerial combat; we score it 66 out of 100. The cramped cockpit sequences make the danger immediate, but across nine episodes the missions become repetitive and too many airmen remain difficult to distinguish.
Where can I watch Masters of the Air in Azerbaijan?
Masters of the Air is not on any streaming or rental service in Azerbaijan at the moment. It is available in 46 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Masters of the Air, and is it suitable for children?
Masters of the Air carries a UK 15 certificate and is not suitable for children under 15, with frightening aerial combat in cramped, bloodied cockpits. We found the confinement and forceful sound particularly unsettling; the series also explores psychological suffering beyond combat, making it a demanding choice for squeamish viewers.
How does Masters of the Air compare to Twelve O'Clock High?
Masters of the Air delivers immediate cockpit terror, but we recommend Twelve O'Clock High for its more patient treatment of aircrew strain and command. The series struggles to distinguish its crowded ensemble, while the harder, more talkative film gives character greater attention, though its grainy combat footage does not always match.
What should I watch after Masters of the Air?
After Masters of the Air, try Twelve O'Clock High (1949, Fi1m 83): Aircrew strain receives the patient character work this series sometimes rushes past. Then Das Boot (1981, Fi1m 89): A confined fighting space, with fear and exhaustion wearing down the crew.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Twelve O'Clock High (1949, Fi1m 83)Aircrew strain receives the patient character work this series sometimes rushes past.

  2. Das Boot (1981, Fi1m 89)A confined fighting space, with fear and exhaustion wearing down the crew.

  3. The Cruel Sea (1953) · not on Fi1m yetA British naval drama with room for exhaustion, doubt and professional duty.

  4. The Ascent (1977) · not on Fi1m yetFor a harsher war drama that gives moral choices their full weight.

  5. Catch-22 (1970) · not on Fi1m yetAirmen face military absurdity in a satire with little patience for noble speeches.

Masters of the Air (2024) review: fine air combat but thin drama (Azerbaijan) | Fi1m