Robin of Locksley (Kevin Costner) aiming a bow with Marian (Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio) in the woods
Film review

Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves

1991 · Directed by Kevin Reynolds · 2h 23m

In a sentenceKevin Costner takes the law into his own hands and leaves most of the entertainment to Alan Rickman

Kevin Costner plays Robin of Locksley, also known as Robin Hood, a man who breaks the law to fight for justice. His struggle to help others runs alongside his pursuit of the woman he loves. Alan Rickman plays the Sheriff of Nottingham, with Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio as Marian and Morgan Freeman as Azeem. Christian Slater is Will Scarlett, Nick Brimble is Little John and Michael McShane is Friar Tuck. This action adventure also features Michael Wincott as Guy of Gisborne and Geraldine McEwan as Mortianna.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

There is a decent adventure here, stretched to 143 minutes and pulled between Kevin Costner’s solemnity and Alan Rickman’s mischief. The supporting cast and Michael Kamen’s score provide reasons to persist, though patience is required.

Kevin Reynolds’s Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves is a decent adventure made tiring by its insistence on being several other things as well. It wants a serious hero, a comic villain, a romance and a message about justice, and it gives each enough attention to interrupt the others. At 143 minutes, there is time for the action to raise our spirits and for the talk to lower them again. We would recommend it cautiously, chiefly for the actors standing around Robin.

Kevin Costner plays Robin of Locksley with a sincerity that ought to help a story about doing right by breaking the law. The trouble is the lack of ease: he carries the hero’s importance into passages that need a lighter touch, and makes the earnest dialogue feel longer than it is. His accent is a smaller problem than his stiffness. The adventure needs more pleasure from its leading man, especially when the supporting actors make such a point of supplying it.

Alan Rickman supplies that pleasure as the Sheriff of Nottingham, playing the villain with a comic extravagance that makes Costner look still more dutiful. We laughed at how thoroughly he enjoys making the Sheriff ridiculous. The performance works because Rickman commits to the man’s vanity rather than politely signalling that the part is a joke. Morgan Freeman’s Azeem offers a calmer source of enjoyment, with a composure that gives the film somewhere to rest. Freeman is especially welcome whenever the film grows overexcited.

Reynolds is at his most persuasive when he concentrates on the adventure. Douglas Milsome’s roving camera gives the action a freedom that the dialogue scenes often lack, and Michael Kamen’s rousing score helps us feel the excitement the hero does not always communicate. John Graysmark’s production design gives the action a credible setting, though it cannot disguise how differently the actors approach their parts. The music, in particular, earns its enthusiasm without requiring much assistance from Costner.

The screenplay by Pen Densham and John Watson makes their work harder by moving awkwardly between earnest instruction and broad comedy. Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio gives Marian more life than the romance consistently allows, but the writing keeps asking us to take things seriously before changing its mind. Peter Boyle’s editing cannot find a comfortable rhythm for the switches, and the film feels long even when there is plenty happening. Individual pleasures arrive regularly, but the stretches between them are often laboured.

Historical tidiness would not rescue it, and we have no objection to a Robin Hood adventure that plays freely with the legend. The genre can accommodate broad comedy and modern attitudes; the difficulty here is getting the same characters to belong comfortably in the serious passages too. Reynolds is not consistently able to do that, which makes the film less satisfying than its strongest performances suggest. Try it for Rickman and Freeman, provided a stiff leading man and a leisurely 143 minutes are not enough to put you off.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

50
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
5

The reviews are divided, with enthusiasm for the swashbuckling competing with frustration at the storytelling. Praise clusters around the supporting cast, particularly Alan Rickman’s gleefully camp Sheriff of Nottingham, while Morgan Freeman also draws favourable notices. Admirers enjoy the action, humour and irreverence, finding enough dash to forgive the untidiness. Even some less persuaded critics find the action sequences entertaining and the supporting performances stronger than the leads.

The divide is wide: what supporters find spirited, detractors find muddled or simply dull. Kevin Costner’s casting and performance attract repeated criticism, alongside complaints about the length, script and awkward insertion of modern social messages. Direction also splits opinion, earning praise for imaginative staging and criticism for being stolid. The AV Club goes further than most, arguing that racism, sexism and inconsistent characterisation make the film difficult to enjoy beyond its nostalgic appeal.

Radio Times
★★★★ · Alan Jones
80

The critic praises the swashbuckling adventure for its handsome entertainment value and dash. Director Kevin Reynolds is singled out for imaginative staging and a roving camera that turns familiar events into an enjoyable popcorn epic, with strong turns from Costner, Rickman and Freeman.

Read the full review →
Time Out
70*

The review finds the mix of comedy, '90s sensibility and swashbuckling action more hit than miss, though the overall effect is rather slapdash. It calls the film spirited and irreverent, but notes it will not suit those who prefer their myths kept sacred.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Phil Thomas
40*

The critic finds the film fun and frantic but undermined by historical inaccuracies, a turgid script, and Kevin Costner sleepwalking through the lead role. It is largely saved by Alan Rickman's gleefully camp performance as the Sheriff of Nottingham.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
14 June 1991 · Kenneth Turan
40*

The critic calls the film muddled and overlong, a jumble of action, preaching, and comic antics that tries to please everyone. Notes Kevin Costner's awkwardness in the lead role.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
14 June 1991 · Vincent Canby
30*

The critic finds the film a mess and joyless reconstruction that awkwardly incorporates modern social messages. Praises the performances of Mary Elizabeth Mastrantonio and Morgan Freeman as the highlights.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
2 October 2014 · Marah Eakin
20*

The film does not hold up on rewatch and is a clunky, poorly acted mess that is disjointed, racist, and sexist. The critic singles out the inconsistent characters, spotty plotting, and uncomfortable scenes for complaint while noting some nostalgic appeal from childhood viewings.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves worth watching?
Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves is worth watching with reservations, and we scored it 65. Alan Rickman's extravagant Sheriff and Morgan Freeman's calm Azeem make it worth persisting with, though Kevin Costner's stiff hero and a leisurely 143 minutes will test patience. Try it for the supporting cast rather than for Robin himself.
How long is Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, and what is it rated?
Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves runs 2h 23m. It is an action and adventure film.
Where can I watch Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves in Slovenia?
Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves is streaming on Netflix in Slovenia. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, and is it suitable for children?
Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves carries a UK 12 certificate, which puts it beyond young children but within reach of most older ones. It is a swordfighting adventure with rough battle action rather than gore, and the villainy leans towards comedy more than menace. Younger viewers are more likely to be bored by the long talky stretches than frightened.
How does Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves compare to The Adventures of Robin Hood?
Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves is the longer, heavier and less enjoyable of the two Robin Hood films. The 1938 The Adventures of Robin Hood is quicker and simpler, with an Errol Flynn who plainly enjoys being an outlaw, where Kevin Costner treats it as a duty. Watch the earlier film first; return to the later one for Alan Rickman.
What should I watch after Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves?
After Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, try The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938, Fi1m 90): A lighter, quicker outlaw adventure with a hero who enjoys the work. Then The Princess Bride (1987, Fi1m 86): For swordplay, romance and villains who understand the value of good comic timing; and Seven Samurai (1954, Fi1m 95): A longer commitment, but its outnumbered fighters earn the time they ask for.

Cast

Awards

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor, 1992

Won
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Actor

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor - Razzie Award, 1992

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst Supporting Actor - Razzie Award

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938, Fi1m 90)A lighter, quicker outlaw adventure with a hero who enjoys the work.

  2. The Princess Bride (1987, Fi1m 86)For swordplay, romance and villains who understand the value of good comic timing.

  3. Fong Sai-yuk (1993) · not reviewed yetJet Li brings agility and comic ease to another fight against corrupt authority.

  4. The Black Tulip (1964) · not reviewed yetFrench swashbuckling that gives its outlaw hero considerably more room to enjoy himself.

  5. Seven Samurai (1954, Fi1m 95)A longer commitment, but its outnumbered fighters earn the time they ask for.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever