Film review

The Adjustment Bureau

2011 · Directed by George Nolfi · 1h 46m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceFate is a mid-century insurance office, and it can be undone by a man falling asleep on a bench

Science FictionThrillerRomance

New York, election night. David Norris (Matt Damon), a young Brooklyn congressman running for the United States Senate, watches his lead vanish after a tabloid prints a photograph from a college reunion. Hiding in a hotel men’s room to rehearse his concession, he meets Elise Sellas (Emily Blunt), a dancer who has crashed a wedding upstairs, and the speech she prods out of him puts him back on the map. Three years on, a chance meeting on a bus gets him her number. It also gets him to his office early, where he finds his friend Charlie Traynor (Michael Kelly) frozen mid-sentence and men in hats working on him. Their leader, Richardson (John Slattery), explains that the world runs to a plan, that David has seen behind it, and that he must never see Elise again.

Fi1m review

George Nolfi’s debut takes a Philip K. Dick premise about men who quietly correct the world and turns it into a romance, and the romance is the good part. Damon and Blunt are easy company; the film explaining itself is not.

George Nolfi’s first film as director takes a Philip K. Dick premise and does something unusual with it: he makes it kind. The idea is that the world runs to a Plan, and that a workforce of men in hats keeps humanity on course with small corrections, a spilt coffee here, a missed bus there. Dick would have used that to frighten us. Nolfi uses it to keep Matt Damon and Emily Blunt apart for 106 minutes, and the film is at its best when it is about the two of them and at its weakest whenever it stops to tell us how the machinery works.

The couple is the good part. Damon plays David Norris, a congressman with a temper and a talent for rooms, as a man who is pleased to be liked and slightly ashamed of how much. Blunt’s Elise Sellas, a dancer he meets in a hotel men’s room, is quicker than him and knows it, and the two of them talk the way people talk when they are trying to make each other laugh. The bus scene, in which she steals his phone and dares him, is the film in miniature, and we grinned all the way through it. We believed the next hour largely on the credit it earned.

The Bureau is a pleasure to look at. Kasia Walicka Maimone puts the agents in fedoras and grey overcoats cut for about 1960, so that John Slattery, playing the harassed middle manager Richardson, looks as though he has stepped out of Mad Men to do a bit of overtime. Kevin Thompson gives them offices of marble and long empty corridors, and a set of ordinary doors that open from one part of Manhattan into another. John Toll shoots all this in plain, bright New York daylight, on the streets and in the parks, so the strangeness has nowhere to hide.

Anthony Mackie gives the film its conscience as Harry Mitchell, the agent who falls asleep on a bench and lets David catch the bus, and who spends the rest of the film looking tired in a way the script never quite explains but Mackie does. Michael Kelly’s Charlie Traynor, the campaign manager, is the one man in David’s life who does not know anything is wrong. Terence Stamp arrives around the midpoint as Thompson, a more senior man, and treats the whole metaphysical apparatus as a nuisance he would rather not discuss. He is the only person in the film who makes the Plan sound like a burden, and the film improves every time he speaks.

The trouble is that everyone else wants to discuss it. Roughly every twenty minutes somebody sits David down and explains another rule: ripples, case files, the Chairman upstairs, why the hats matter. Each rule is introduced so that it can be bent later, and by the second hour we found we were nodding along politely, the way one does when a stranger explains the rules of a game we had already agreed to play. The film also spells out what David and Elise each stand to lose by staying together, and once it has done that the romance feels like a calculation. The last stretch takes a turn we will not describe; we will say only that after ninety minutes of a system with no exits, one appears so tidily that we felt slightly patronised.

Thomas Newman’s score does not help. It is piano and warm strings, and it plays over the chases as well as the kisses, so the film never gets to be frightening for more than a few seconds at a time. Jay Rabinowitz cuts the foot chases with real clarity, so that we always know which door leads where; he cuts the briefings as fast as he can and they still sit there.

Dick’s people usually open a door and find another room. Nolfi’s find a way out, and it is the least interesting thing about them. This is a good film for two people who have already agreed to like each other, best watched at home, where the hats are funnier and the speeches feel shorter than they do in the dark. It runs 106 minutes, carries a 12A, and reached UK cinemas on 4 March 2011.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

62
Positive
8
Mixed
9
Negative
2

Most critics come away mildly pleased, and the praise lands in one place: Matt Damon and Emily Blunt. Nearly every review credits their pairing with making the romance believable and carrying the film through its softer stretches. Those who like it most see it as a romantic adventure rather than a science-fiction thriller, and they single out the New York locations, the production design and a brisk first hour that keeps the exposition light.

The reservations cluster on the second half. Several reviews say the film over-explains its bureau, answers its questions about free will clumsily and settles for a resolution that is too neat, and a few find George Nolfi’s direction safe and visually unambitious. The spread is wide, from approval to two outright dismissals: Slant calls it formulaic and ludicrous by the end, and the Evening Standard breaks with the majority to find Blunt’s performance grating rather than charming.

Empire
27 February 2009 · Helen O'Hara
80*

The critic praises it as an intelligent, entertaining metaphysical love story/thriller with crackling chemistry between the leads and light exposition that keeps the pace brisk.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
24 February 2011 · festival review
80*

The critic sees the film as a sophisticated romantic adventure at heart rather than a sci-fi thriller, praising the charming pairing of Matt Damon and Emily Blunt as its beating heart along with elegant production design, a smart script and enough thrills to hold attention. It could appeal widely if marketed as a well-made romance rather than an action romp.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
24 February 2011 · Todd McCarthy
80*

The critic finds it a genuinely romantic fantasy suspense thriller that succeeds through convincing chemistry between its leads and a light, pragmatic take on the controlling 'System.' It stands out for its heart and New York locations over more cerebral sci-fi peers.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
3 March 2011 · Peter Bradshaw
70*

The critic finds the film a light-hearted Philip K Dick adaptation turned glitzy conspiracy thriller with jaunty absurdity. It succeeds as an entertaining speculative comedy on love, free will and fate, anchored by the leads' rapport.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
3 March 2011 · Critic’s Pick · Manohla Dargis
70*

The critic praises this fast, sure directorial debut for its witty mix of science-fiction metaphysics and old-fashioned romance. She singles out the likable, confidently sexy leads and the balanced tone between sincerity and self-conscious amusement.

Read the full review →
Total Film
24 February 2011 · Jonathan Crocker
65*

The critic finds it a surprisingly heartfelt romance thanks to the strong chemistry between Matt Damon and Emily Blunt and their engaging dialogue, though criticizes the direction as safe and bland.

Read the full review →

Cast

If you liked this, try…