Film review

The Fugitive

1993 · Directed by Andrew Davis · 2h 11m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceHarrison Ford needs a lie-down, but Tommy Lee Jones would want to know exactly where

ActionThrillerDrama

Richard Kimble (Harrison Ford) is a doctor wrongly convicted of murdering his wife, Helen (Sela Ward). Pursued by the authorities, he tries to find the one-armed man who can explain what happened and help him clear his name. Samuel Gerard (Tommy Lee Jones), the marshal hunting him, has a different task: to bring Kimble in. The chase pits a man trying to prove his innocence against a professional determined to finish the job. Andrew Davis directs, with Joe Pantoliano, Jeroen Krabbé and Julianne Moore among the supporting cast.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Andrew Davis makes a familiar chase feel urgent by trusting Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones to think as well as run. The plotting grows less convincing, and the music presses too hard, but we recommend it warmly.

The Fugitive is an excellent chase thriller, with a few convenient answers and more insistence from the music than it needs. Andrew Davis understands the pleasure of watching capable people work under pressure, and gives Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones enough room to make their decisions interesting. Kimble is trying to clear his name; Gerard is trying to catch him. That simple arrangement carries 131 minutes because neither actor treats the other man’s intelligence as an inconvenience to the plot.

Ford gives Richard Kimble the fatigue of a man who cannot afford to stop. He makes Kimble’s efforts to think clearly under pressure convincing, without suggesting that intelligence can make the fear go away. We worried about him because the strain stays visible in his face. Michael Chapman’s photography makes that face easy to read amid the action, keeping our attention on what the pursuit is costing him.

Jones gives Samuel Gerard enough impatience to be funny without making him a comic interruption. The pleasure comes from the sense that this man has already considered the obvious suggestion and would rather nobody made it. He is a formidable pursuer because Jones makes attention itself seem threatening: we believe he will notice whatever Kimble misses. Davis is sensible enough to let that intelligence compete with Ford’s, rather than giving all the cleverness to the fugitive. The chase remains interesting when the men are simply thinking.

The train crash is the large, noisy exception to any suggestion that Davis intends a restrained evening. J. Dennis Washington’s production design gives the wreckage an ugly weight, and we were gripped by the prospect of a person having to find a way through it. The scale threatens to overwhelm the story, but the danger still feels close enough to matter. Davis keeps the sequence attached to Kimble’s predicament, so the destruction does not become a separate attraction that we wait to finish.

Editors Dennis Virkler, Dov Hoenig, Dean Goodhill, David Finfer, Don Brochu and Richard Nord keep the pursuit clear when it could easily become a blur. They also leave enough space for the actors to seem to arrive at decisions, rather than merely appear wherever the chase needs them next. James Newton Howard’s score is less judicious. It presses the excitement too hard, adding emphasis to action that Davis and the editors have already made legible and urgent.

David Twohy and Jeb Stuart’s screenplay falters when it has to explain the crime. Some of the behaviour needed to make that explanation work is difficult to believe, and the speed cannot quite carry us past it. This matters because the two leads have encouraged us to expect people to act with some sense. The writing is sharp enough elsewhere that these conveniences feel avoidable, though they do not undo the more persuasive business of finding, evading and thinking a step ahead.

Chase thrillers can become tiring when every escape merely starts the next pursuit. Davis keeps us interested in how these men work, and allows Gerard to be good at his job without making Kimble any less worth our concern. Give it an evening, with some tolerance for the music telling you how exciting it all is.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

82
Positive
6
Mixed
1
Negative
0

Most critics greet The Fugitive as an intelligent, tightly driven chase thriller, with praise clustering around Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones, Andrew Davis’s direction and the sustained suspense. The leads’ cat-and-mouse exchanges give the action much of its force, while the screenplay’s wit and clarity earn approval alongside the large-scale set pieces. The consensus is that familiar thriller material benefits from assured filmmaking and two well-matched performances.

Reservations concern formula, plausibility and excess rather than the basic appeal of the pursuit. The New Yorker admires the leads but finds the film too long, clichéd in places and burdened by an overly loud score. Time Out is the clearest dissenter, finding the chase glossy and formulaic and Ford emotionally limited, though it praises Jones. The spread therefore runs from enthusiastic approval to qualified appreciation, with no outright rejection.

RogerEbert.com
6 August 1993 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

Ebert calls it one of the year's best entertainments, a tense thriller that rises to an operatic allegory of an innocent man crushed by the system. He singles out the masterful direction, the cat-and-mouse dynamic between Ford and Jones, and the film's classic filmmaking values.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
6 August 1993 · Duane Byrge
90*

The critic praises the film's fast-paced chase thriller elements, perfect casting of Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones, lean and brainy screenplay, and strong technical contributions, calling it cinematic storytelling at its best. Minor quibble noted about the ultimate antagonist's actions not being wholly credible.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
6 August 1993 · Janet Maslin
90*

Maslin declares the film a smashing success and juggernaut of an action-adventure saga with crisp intelligence and relentless pace. She praises the sensational direction by Andrew Davis and the steely performances by Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
6 August 1993 · Kenneth Turan
85*

Turan calls it a super-adrenalized stemwinder of a thriller packed with tension, energy, intelligence, and wit. He highlights the perfectly cast leads Harrison Ford and Tommy Lee Jones and Davis's growth as an action director.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · John Ferguson
80

The big-screen adaptation improves on the original TV series. Harrison Ford is solid as the wrongly convicted doctor, but Tommy Lee Jones delivers an Oscar-winning performance as the determined marshal, while director Andrew Davis keeps the suspense high with memorable set pieces.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
9 August 1993 · Anthony Lane
70*

Lane finds it a strong chase picture with Ford and Jones delivering rock-steady, brainy performances that charge the material. He notes the film's sombre fun and set pieces but criticizes its length, clichés, and overly loud score.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1994

Nominated
Best Cinematography
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Original Score
Nominated
Best Picture
Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Sound Editing
Won
Best Supporting Actor

If you liked this, try…

North by Northwest poster89

North by Northwest

1959 · Another innocent man is pursued, with more glamour and considerably worse directions.

High and Low poster

High and Low

1963 · A police investigation with comparable patience for work, and greater moral unease.

The Day of the Jackal poster

The Day of the Jackal

1973 · Two methodical professionals make the wait for a confrontation difficult to bear.

The Taking of Pelham One Two Three poster

The Taking of Pelham One Two Three

1974 · Brisk professional exchanges and dry humour keep a city thriller moving.

Tell No One poster

Tell No One

2006 · A husband’s search for answers becomes a chase with similarly personal stakes.