Quaid (Arnold Schwarzenegger) hanging from a metal beam while shouting
Film review

Total Recall

1990 · Directed by Paul Verhoeven · 1h 53m

In a sentenceArnold Schwarzenegger cannot trust his own memories, which is unfortunate for everyone within punching distance

Quaid (Arnold Schwarzenegger) is an ordinary man with an implanted memory and a growing need to discover who he is. His wife, Lori (Sharon Stone), belongs to the life he thinks he knows, but he can no longer take that life for granted. With Rachel Ticotin as Melina, the story follows Quaid’s search towards Mars and a dictator’s rule. He wants an account of his past he can trust. The difficulty is knowing which memories are his, and whether the people around him are giving him any reason to believe them.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Paul Verhoeven turns Arnold Schwarzenegger’s confusion into a funny, unnerving science-fiction thriller. The violence occasionally crowds out the questions, but the uncertainty about what is real survives a considerable amount of gunfire.

Total Recall is a sharp, funny science-fiction action film whose appetite for violence occasionally gets ahead of its ideas. Paul Verhoeven puts an identity crisis inside an Arnold Schwarzenegger vehicle and refuses to treat either ingredient politely. Quaid has the physique to deal with most threats, but an implanted memory presents a problem that strength cannot settle. Much of the pleasure comes from watching a star so physically assured play a man who cannot be certain of himself.

The screenplay by Gary Goldman, Dan O’Bannon and Ronald Shusett gives that uncertainty enough room to survive the action. Quaid’s difficulty is easy to grasp: remembering something does not establish that it happened. The film keeps us looking for reassurance and then questioning how readily we accepted it, which makes us share something of its hero’s trouble. There is enough forward movement that considering the possibilities never feels like homework, and enough doubt to make the pursuit worth thinking about.

Schwarzenegger is essential to that effect, and his stiffness is useful here. His effort to make sense of things is visible, giving Quaid a vulnerability that a smoother performance might have lost. We were more unsettled by his uncertainty than we expected, because his physical confidence offers so little protection against his own memories. Sharon Stone, as Lori, is alert and precise, giving her exchanges with him enough bite to keep our attention between the bursts of violence.

Jost Vacano’s cinematography makes good comic use of Schwarzenegger’s bulk without losing the confusion in his face. William Sandell’s production design can look conspicuously artificial, but that quality suits a story that asks us to distrust Quaid’s surroundings. Some effects reveal their workings a little too readily; their awkward physicality also makes the bodily damage unpleasant to contemplate. Verhoeven is willing to make his star look ridiculous, and the images gain something from denying Schwarzenegger the dignity that an action lead usually expects.

Frank J. Urioste’s editing gives the pursuit a welcome directness. We may be unsure what Quaid should believe, but the action seldom leaves us wondering what has just happened. Jerry Goldsmith’s score presses forward with a seriousness that makes the grotesque comedy more amusing, rather than signalling every joke. Between the cutting and the music, the film makes its 113 minutes feel brisk, while leaving us enough space to question what we have been shown.

The qualification is the sheer amount of violence. Verhoeven sometimes appears so pleased with another opportunity for bodily punishment that the question of who Quaid is has to wait its turn. A few stretches would be tenser with fewer impacts, and the humour cannot make every excess feel necessary. The cruelty will be a reasonable stopping point for some viewers, particularly when the action keeps insisting on itself after the immediate shock has worn off.

Within science-fiction action, this is an unusually successful use of a star whose presence could easily have overwhelmed the stranger material. Schwarzenegger gives us someone worth following even when we cannot confidently explain what he is following, and the film trusts us to tolerate that uncertainty. Choose it for an evening when laughing and recoiling at the same image sounds appealing; anyone hoping for a quiet examination of memory should look elsewhere.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

79
Positive
12
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics find Total Recall a smart, forceful science-fiction action film, with praise clustering around Paul Verhoeven’s pace, black humour and willingness to keep its questions about identity unresolved. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s performance is another point of agreement: the reviews find commanding presence, comic absurdity and enough vulnerability to give the violence a sympathetic centre. The effects and inventive set pieces earn broad approval, while the implanted-memory premise gives critics more to enjoy than the action alone.

Reservations concern how well the spectacle serves that premise. Some critics find the dated effects charming; others see ageing sets and excess gore. Empire finds less satirical bite than in Verhoeven’s other work. The spread is wide despite twelve positive reviews: the lone negative response, from The New Yorker, finds the film joyless and oppressive, arguing that its violence and crude style squander the clever story.

The Times
20 November 2020 · ★★★★★ · Kevin Maher
100

The restored 1990 classic is hailed as a weighty sci-fi hit whose identity riddle and quotable lead performance still captivate. The critic dismisses the later remake and praises the original's enduring mystery and restoration.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
4 out of 5 · John Ferguson
90*

The review highlights the smart script and Verhoeven's over-the-top mix of black humour, ultra-violence, and spectacular effects. It singles out Sharon Stone's performance as the duplicitous spouse for praise.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
2 December 2016 · Tom Breihan
90*

The critic calls Total Recall one of the best straight-up ’80s action movies and a hall-of-fame cinematic headfuck that blends gleefully nasty mainstream entertainment with Philip K. Dick ambiguities and reality-questioning twists. Verhoeven’s pacing, practical effects, and willingness to leave big questions unanswered make it a forward-thinking sci-fi freakout and late monument to excessive action style.

Read the full review →
Time Out
6 August 2012 · 4 out of 5 stars · Tom Huddleston
90*

The critic praises the perfect team-up of Schwarzenegger, Verhoeven, and Philip K. Dick, calling the film slick, sly, and subversive, with the theme of identity loss intact despite deviations from the source. They single out the charm added by aged special effects.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Simon Braund
85*

Total Recall exemplifies Verhoeven’s approach of cranking up the volume, violence and surrealism in dystopian sci-fi, even if it lacks the satirical edge of some of his other work. Adapted from Philip K. Dick, it delivers a clever premise with brutal action, memorable set pieces and strong Arnie performance.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
5 August 2012 · John Semley
85*

The critic finds Total Recall a thoroughly Verhoevenian work that succeeds precisely because of its blockbuster scale and star vehicle status, embedding irony and cheekiness deep into its DNA. Verhoeven renders Schwarzenegger hilarious and ludicrous within the sci-fi actioner through deformations and degradations while delivering a burlesque of popcorn cinema itself.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Total Recall worth watching?
Total Recall is worth watching for anyone who wants a sharp, funny science-fiction action film, and we scored it 84. Paul Verhoeven builds an identity crisis around Arnold Schwarzenegger's stiffness and makes it unsettling as well as amusing. The violence sometimes crowds out the ideas, so it is not the film for a quiet evening on memory.
How long is Total Recall, and what is it rated?
Total Recall runs 1h 53m. It is an action and adventure film.
Where can I watch Total Recall in Iceland?
Total Recall is not on any streaming or rental service in Iceland at the moment. It is available in 21 other countries; change your country at the top of the page to see where. Availability is checked daily.
How violent or frightening is Total Recall, and is it suitable for children?
Total Recall is an 18 certificate and is not suitable for children. The violence is frequent and often grotesque, with bodily damage the film lingers on past the initial shock, and the effects' awkward physicality makes it unpleasant rather than cartoonish. Squeamish adults may find the cruelty a reasonable stopping point; those who can laugh and recoil at once will manage.
How does Total Recall compare to RoboCop?
Total Recall and RoboCop are both violent identity crises from Paul Verhoeven, and RoboCop is the sharper film. Its jokes about corporate power land harder and Peter Weller's metal policeman is unexpectedly affecting, where Schwarzenegger's Quaid is more ridiculous than moving. Choose Total Recall for the bigger, stranger adventure and the puzzle about what is real; choose RoboCop for the tighter satire.
What should I watch after Total Recall?
After Total Recall, try Seconds (1966, Fi1m 84): A bought identity proves less reassuring than advertised, with far fewer explosions. Then RoboCop (1987, Fi1m 91): Another violent identity crisis, with sharper jokes about the people signing cheques; and The City of Lost Children (1995, Fi1m 78): Stolen dreams and elaborate machinery make another peculiar, grubby future worth exploring.

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1991

Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Sound Editing

Saturn Awards, 1991

Won
Best Science Fiction Film

If you liked this, try…

  1. Seconds (1966, Fi1m 84)A bought identity proves less reassuring than advertised, with far fewer explosions.

  2. RoboCop (1987, Fi1m 91)Another violent identity crisis, with sharper jokes about the people signing cheques.

  3. The City of Lost Children (1995, Fi1m 78)Stolen dreams and elaborate machinery make another peculiar, grubby future worth exploring.

  4. eXistenZ (1999) · not reviewed yetBodily disgust and uncertain realities, with a similarly unhealthy sense of humour.

  5. Paprika (2006, Fi1m 80)Dreams and waking life collide in animation that makes confusion worth following.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever