a woman with blonde hair holding a sledgehammer beside a blue car at a gas station
Series review

Poker Face

2023 · Created by Rian Johnson · Series

In a sentenceA lie detector with a rasp and no use for a trouser press

Charlie Cale (Natasha Lyonne) can tell when someone is lying. A waitress and drifter, she encounters a succession of murders and brings that ability to bear on the people involved. Each self-contained case lets the audience see the crime before Charlie works her way towards the culprit, shifting the question from who did it to how she will catch them. Her talkative manner and dishevelled appearance accompany a knack for noticing what others would prefer to conceal. Adrien Brody, Benjamin Bratt and Chloë Sevigny are among the supporting cast.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Natasha Lyonne makes Poker Face excellent company: a funny, warm crime series that enjoys the work of catching a killer. A few cases dawdle, particularly when they keep their most interesting person off screen.

Poker Face is a warmly recommended crime series, with one recurring irritation: some cases take too long to give Natasha Lyonne enough to do. Its self-contained mysteries are built around Charlie Cale, a waitress and drifter who can spot a lie, and the pleasure is in watching her work out what that lie means. Rian Johnson, among the programme’s writers and directors, understands the appeal of a familiar procedure carried out by someone we like. The next murder is a perfectly serviceable reason to spend more time with her.

The series follows the Columbo approach, letting us know about the crime before its investigator catches up. We listen to a suspect’s answers with information Charlie still has to acquire, which makes the talk itself part of the suspense. Knowing that a statement is false does not explain everything, so the lie-detecting gift still leaves room for questions and deduction. The format also lets an episode finish its business, a modest courtesy that television can be reluctant to extend.

Lyonne supplies the reason to care about all this machinery. Her rasping voice and unhurried chatter give Charlie a social ease that sits agreeably with her dishevelled appearance; she seems like someone who might talk for a while before mentioning the important thing. We laughed at the contrast between her untidy manner and the certainty with which she recognises a lie. Lyonne makes that ability funny without making Charlie smug, and her canniness never wipes out the warmth that keeps these encounters from becoming a procession of people being shown up.

The supporting cast includes Adrien Brody, Benjamin Bratt and Chloë Sevigny, giving the series plenty of company for Lyonne. Changing the people around Charlie helps the repeated structure stay lively, though the guest performances cannot always compensate for her absence. Steve Yedlin and Jaron Presant are among the cinematographers, and the images have a tidiness that makes Charlie’s rumpled appearance funnier. Judy Rhee’s production design helps distinguish one case from the next, so the familiar structure need not mean looking at the same thing all evening.

The problem is the time spent getting back to Charlie. Editors including Melissa Kent and Bob Ducsay have the delicate job of making a crime interesting before the person we came to see gets involved, and the rhythm is not equally sure in every case. When an opening goes on, we start waiting for Lyonne rather than attending to what is there. The music, with Nathan Johnson among those credited, is an agreeable accompaniment but seldom the source of the programme’s personality. Her voice supplies more of that than the score.

We would take these as individual evening cases rather than hurry through them in a long sitting. Repetition is part of the pleasure, but the less nimble episodes are more noticeable when placed directly beside the brisk ones. Anyone needing a mystery to conceal its culprit will have to adjust to watching an investigator catch up with what we already know. Lyonne makes that adjustment easy. Give Charlie an evening, then save the next case for another.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

81
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The consensus is warmly positive: Poker Face makes the self-contained television mystery feel inviting again. Praise centres on Natasha Lyonne, whose rasping delivery, dishevelled charm and canny performance give the lie-detecting lead character more appeal than the premise alone might promise. Critics repeatedly welcome the Columbo-style structure, with the pleasure lying in how the culprit is caught. The stylish presentation, guest performances and carefully constructed cases also draw approval, alongside a warmth that keeps the nostalgia from feeling dutiful.

The differences are chiefly matters of enthusiasm rather than fundamental disagreement. Reservations cluster around the rhythm of individual episodes: Vulture finds that some drag or lack buoyancy, while The Hollywood Reporter notes uneven pacing and stretches that underuse Lyonne. Neither treats those faults as fatal. Across the reviews, the episodic formula is largely a strength; the question is how consistently each instalment delivers its pleasures.

The Times
12 May 2023 · Hugo Rifkind
85*

The critic loves the human lie detector premise and calls the show brilliantly done, sleek and smart with very funny moments thanks to Lyonne's boho dishevelment. They single out the way the structure makes the audience complicit with the detective and her wayward charisma.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
26 January 2023
80*

The critic praises the series as delivering fun with a refreshing twist on the mystery-of-the-week structure and highlights Natasha Lyonne’s charismatic performance as the lead detective. They single out the assured, stylish television and the magnetic Columbo update in Lyonne’s character.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
26 May 2023 · ★★★★
80

The critic finds it a larkishly enjoyable feat of cultural mixology that executes the killer-of-the-week formula to near-perfection. They single out Natasha Lyonne’s rasping, charismatic performance as the hard-drinking lie-detecting waitress.

Read the full review →
Vulture
25 January 2023
70*

The critic finds the show a sturdy, reliable episodic mystery in the Columbo style, praising its self-contained episodes, Natasha Lyonne's performance, and warm worldview, while noting some episodes drag or lack buoyancy.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
25 January 2023 · Daniel Fienberg

The critic calls it a fun romp and a TV mystery fan’s delight with nostalgic charm, tight mysteries, and strong guest stars. Some episodes have off pacing and underuse Lyonne, though the standalone howcatchems are carefully constructed and efficient.

Read the full review →
Variety
25 January 2023 · Daniel D'Addario

The critic finds the series a clever, winning mystery throwback that succeeds as vintage episodic TV. Lyonne's calibrated, garrulous performance as the lie-detecting drifter is singled out for praise as she navigates standalone cases with canniness and self-preservation.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Poker Face worth watching?
Poker Face is worth watching for anyone who enjoys a self-contained mystery solved by good company, and we scored it 82. Natasha Lyonne's Charlie Cale, a drifter who can spot a lie, carries each case, and the series is funny and warm rather than grim. A few episodes dawdle before she arrives, so we would take them one evening at a time.
Where can I watch Poker Face in Bulgaria?
Poker Face is streaming on SkyShowtime in Bulgaria. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Poker Face, and is it suitable for children?
Poker Face is a 15 in the UK and TV-MA in the US, so it is not for children. Each episode is built around a murder shown before the investigator catches up, so the violence is present rather than hidden, though the tone is closer to comedy than horror. Older teenagers used to crime drama should manage; the squeamish will find little to dread.
How does Poker Face compare to Jonathan Creek?
Poker Face and Jonathan Creek are both mysteries carried by an eccentric problem-solver, and both make good company for an evening. Poker Face shows us the crime first and lets us watch Charlie catch up, while Jonathan Creek keeps its puzzles hidden and rewards attention to the explanation. We find Poker Face the more consistent and the warmer of the two; Jonathan Creek has the more intricate puzzles when it is at its best.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Columbo (1971) · not reviewed yetThe original pleasure of knowing the culprit and enjoying the investigator’s approach.

  2. Jonathan Creek (1997, Fi1m 78)Another eccentric problem-solver whose cases make good company for an evening.

  3. The Last of Sheila (1973) · not reviewed yetA talkative ensemble mystery for those who enjoy noticing the carefully placed clue.

  4. Inspector Montalbano (1999) · not reviewed yetAn observant investigator, a strong sense of place and room for comedy.

  5. The Kid Detective (2020) · not reviewed yetA dishevelled investigator and dry humour, with a considerably darker aftertaste.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever