Film review

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

1989 · Directed by Steven Spielberg · 2h 07m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceEven Indiana Jones cannot convince his father that he knows what he is doing

AdventureAction

Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) returns for a globe-trotting adventure involving his father, Professor Henry Jones (Sean Connery). An opening episode follows the younger Indy, played by River Phoenix, before the story turns to the adult adventurer. Father and son bring their disagreements with them, and their relationship becomes part of the journey alongside the action. Denholm Elliott plays Marcus Brody, John Rhys-Davies plays Sallah and Alison Doody plays Elsa, with Julian Glover as Walter Donovan. Directed by Steven Spielberg from a screenplay by Jeffrey Boam, the film follows the expedition alongside the pair’s efforts to get along.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Harrison Ford and Sean Connery make this a funny, affectionate adventure worth returning to. The action sometimes repeats familiar pleasures, but the father-and-son friction gives Steven Spielberg’s film enough life to compensate.

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is funny, affectionate and worth an evening, even when its action feels familiar enough to anticipate. Steven Spielberg has the good sense to put Harrison Ford opposite Sean Connery as Indiana’s father and let them irritate each other. Indiana’s confidence is much more entertaining when someone close to him declines to be impressed by it. Their disagreements keep the film lively when the journey itself starts to feel predictable.

The prologue with River Phoenix as the young Indy is entertaining, though Spielberg crams in more activity than it needs. The main story takes its time arriving, and the opening begins to feel like a separate adventure demanding equal attention. Phoenix brings enough energy to make the detour enjoyable on its own terms. We would still happily lose some of the bustle to reach the father-and-son business sooner.

Jeffrey Boam’s screenplay is strongest when it lets the two men disagree without making either of them entirely ridiculous. Connery plays paternal certainty with such ease that Ford scarcely has to do anything except look increasingly put out. We laughed at that exasperation: Indiana seems much less equipped to cope with his father’s opinions than with the expedition. There is affection in Connery’s performance, but no suggestion that affection obliges Henry to concede a point. Ford lets Indiana look thoroughly annoyed without making him unpleasant.

Douglas Slocombe’s cinematography keeps Ford readable within the action, so the pleasure of watching him struggle is not lost in the size of the spectacle. We can follow the danger and still catch the expression that makes it funny. Michael Kahn’s editing gives those reactions time to register without stopping everything for a joke. Spielberg remembers that watching the effort on Ford’s face is part of the entertainment.

Elliot Scott’s production design gives the action spaces a solid, imposing look that usefully offsets the clowning. That solidity matters when the film is this keen to make us laugh. John Williams’s score is buoyant and assertive, giving the action momentum even when the story is following an easily guessed course. The music also suits the broad comedy; it allows the adventure to be fun without constantly demanding our awe.

The comparison with Raiders of the [Lost](/film/lost) Ark does expose the limits. This film is looser and more indulgent, and the familiar rhythms of the expedition occasionally make it seem as though Spielberg is relying on our goodwill. At 127 minutes, it has enough room for that repetition to become noticeable, especially when the leads are not supplying the entertainment. It remains enjoyable through those stretches, but the prospect of the next action sequence does not always bring much curiosity about it.

The father-and-son relationship supplies enough feeling to make the indulgence forgivable. Connery and Ford allow the irritation to remain even when the affection is apparent, which is a large part of why their partnership is so enjoyable. Watch it with someone who knows how quickly a conversation with a parent can become an argument.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

5 of 6
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
0
Radio Times
★★★★★ · John Ferguson
100

The series is restored to form after Temple of Doom thanks to the inspired pairing of Harrison Ford and Sean Connery as father and son. Spielberg delivers epic-scale action with panache, highlighted by the young Indy prologue featuring River Phoenix.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Bob McCabe
80*

The film is the most entertaining entry in the series and a fitting end to the Indy trilogy, though it does not quite match Raiders. The standout element is the interplay and chemistry between Harrison Ford and Sean Connery as father and son.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CM
80*

The film recaptures the spirit of Raiders of the Lost Ark with its action set pieces and globe-trotting adventure. The standout element is Sean Connery as Indy's father, whose sparring relationship with Harrison Ford provides the emotional core and prevents the movie feeling like pure déjà vu.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
5 June 1989 · Pauline Kael
50*

The review calls the film enjoyable but a familiar, repetitive rehash that lacks the original thrill of earlier entries. It singles out the Connery-Ford father-son interplay and clowning for providing the main spark and personality.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
24 May 1989 · Sheila Benson

The review says Indiana quits at the top of the heap even as the genre feels mechanical and on the wane. It singles out the Harrison Ford-Sean Connery father-son chemistry for delivering affection and acerbic moments amid the action.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
22 May 2008 · Jeremiah Kipp

The critic finds the film a solid but transitional effort lacking the energy of predecessors, praising the father-son dynamic between Indy and his dad. They single out the chemistry between Ford and Connery for praise while complaining about overkill in the prologue and lack of dynamism.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1990

Nominated
Best Original Score
Nominated
Best Sound
Won
Best Sound Editing

Hugo Awards, 1990

Won
Best Dramatic Presentation

If you liked this, try…

The Man from Rio poster

The Man from Rio

1964 · Physical comedy and globe-trotting danger, with a hero forever struggling to keep up

The Man Who Would Be King poster

The Man Who Would Be King

1975 · Connery supplies more argumentative companionship, though this expedition takes ambition considerably more seriously

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre poster

The Treasure of the Sierra Madre

1948 · A rougher treasure hunt, with greed doing more damage than the terrain

Hunt for the Wilderpeople poster

Hunt for the Wilderpeople

2016 · An irritable older man and a stubborn boy make unexpectedly affecting travelling companions

The Adventures of Robin Hood poster

The Adventures of Robin Hood

1938 · Cleanly staged action and cheerful defiance, with no embarrassment about entertaining the audience