Henry Jones (Sean Connery) and Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) bound back to back in a burning hall
Film review

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade

1989 · Directed by Steven Spielberg · 2h 07m

In a sentenceEven Indiana Jones cannot convince his father that he knows what he is doing

Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) returns for a globe-trotting adventure involving his father, Professor Henry Jones (Sean Connery). An opening episode follows the younger Indy, played by River Phoenix, before the story turns to the adult adventurer. Father and son bring their disagreements with them, and their relationship becomes part of the journey alongside the action. Denholm Elliott plays Marcus Brody, John Rhys-Davies plays Sallah and Alison Doody plays Elsa, with Julian Glover as Walter Donovan. Directed by Steven Spielberg from a screenplay by Jeffrey Boam, the film follows the expedition alongside the pair’s efforts to get along.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Harrison Ford and Sean Connery make this a funny, affectionate adventure worth returning to. The action sometimes repeats familiar pleasures, but the father-and-son friction gives Steven Spielberg’s film enough life to compensate.

Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is funny, affectionate and worth an evening, even when its action feels familiar enough to anticipate. Steven Spielberg has the good sense to put Harrison Ford opposite Sean Connery as Indiana’s father and let them irritate each other. Indiana’s confidence is much more entertaining when someone close to him declines to be impressed by it. Their disagreements keep the film lively when the journey itself starts to feel predictable.

The prologue with River Phoenix as the young Indy is entertaining, though Spielberg crams in more activity than it needs. The main story takes its time arriving, and the opening begins to feel like a separate adventure demanding equal attention. Phoenix brings enough energy to make the detour enjoyable on its own terms. We would still happily lose some of the bustle to reach the father-and-son business sooner.

Jeffrey Boam’s screenplay is strongest when it lets the two men disagree without making either of them entirely ridiculous. Connery plays paternal certainty with such ease that Ford scarcely has to do anything except look increasingly put out. We laughed at that exasperation: Indiana seems much less equipped to cope with his father’s opinions than with the expedition. There is affection in Connery’s performance, but no suggestion that affection obliges Henry to concede a point. Ford lets Indiana look thoroughly annoyed without making him unpleasant.

Douglas Slocombe’s cinematography keeps Ford readable within the action, so the pleasure of watching him struggle is not lost in the size of the spectacle. We can follow the danger and still catch the expression that makes it funny. Michael Kahn’s editing gives those reactions time to register without stopping everything for a joke. Spielberg remembers that watching the effort on Ford’s face is part of the entertainment.

Elliot Scott’s production design gives the action spaces a solid, imposing look that usefully offsets the clowning. That solidity matters when the film is this keen to make us laugh. John Williams’s score is buoyant and assertive, giving the action momentum even when the story is following an easily guessed course. The music also suits the broad comedy; it allows the adventure to be fun without constantly demanding our awe.

The comparison with Raiders of the Lost Ark does expose the limits. This film is looser and more indulgent, and the familiar rhythms of the expedition occasionally make it seem as though Spielberg is relying on our goodwill. At 127 minutes, it has enough room for that repetition to become noticeable, especially when the leads are not supplying the entertainment. It remains enjoyable through those stretches, but the prospect of the next action sequence does not always bring much curiosity about it.

The father-and-son relationship supplies enough feeling to make the indulgence forgivable. Connery and Ford allow the irritation to remain even when the affection is apparent, which is a large part of why their partnership is so enjoyable. Watch it with someone who knows how quickly a conversation with a parent can become an argument.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

77
Positive
12
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics like it, and nearly all of them like it for the same reason. Sean Connery as Henry Jones Sr, bickering with Harrison Ford’s Indy, is named as the film’s chief pleasure in almost every review, credited with giving the adventure a heart the series had not shown before. Several call it a return to form after Temple of Doom and a fitting close to the trilogy. The Venice catacombs, the desert tank chase and the River Phoenix prologue also draw regular praise.

The reservations cluster on familiarity. A number of reviews note that the film reruns the shape of Raiders of the Lost Ark, and a few think it does so with less energy. The New Yorker finds it enjoyable but repetitive, Slant Magazine calls it a solid, transitional entry short on dynamism, and the Los Angeles Times suggests the genre itself is running down. The spread is narrow: no review is negative, and even the doubters concede the Connery-Ford double act.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · John Ferguson
100

The series is restored to form after Temple of Doom thanks to the inspired pairing of Harrison Ford and Sean Connery as father and son. Spielberg delivers epic-scale action with panache, highlighted by the young Indy prologue featuring River Phoenix.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
24 May 1989 · Caryn James
90*

The review finds the film nearly as good as the first in the series and a strong finale, with the father-son pairing providing resonance and depth. It singles out Sean Connery’s presence for giving the adventure emotional shading and turning it into an ultimate quest story.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Bob McCabe
80*

The film is the most entertaining entry in the series and a fitting end to the Indy trilogy, though it does not quite match Raiders. The standout element is the interplay and chemistry between Harrison Ford and Sean Connery as father and son.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
12 March 2024 · ★★★★ · William Mata
80

The critic praises Sean Connery's perfect portrayal of Henry Jones Sr as both a genius archaeologist and bumbling dad, highlighting the strong odd-couple chemistry with Indiana Jones and the satisfying conclusion to the original trilogy. They single out Connery as the standout element everyone remembers, noting the film's cheesy but enjoyable family-oriented adventures and River Phoenix's cameo.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
24 May 1989 · Roger Ebert
80*

The critic finds delight in the film's pulp-adventure spirit and set pieces like the Venice catacombs and desert tank chase, while praising Sean Connery's turn as Indy's father and Harrison Ford's easy charisma. A shade of disappointment stems from the material no longer feeling new after Raiders of the Lost Ark.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· CM
80*

The film recaptures the spirit of Raiders of the Lost Ark with its action set pieces and globe-trotting adventure. The standout element is Sean Connery as Indy's father, whose sparring relationship with Harrison Ford provides the emotional core and prevents the movie feeling like pure déjà vu.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade worth watching?
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is worth watching for anyone who enjoys a funny, affectionate adventure, and we scored it 83. Harrison Ford and Sean Connery bickering as son and father carry the film, though the action itself often follows a course you can guess. At 127 minutes the repetition shows when the leads are off screen.
How long is Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, and what is it rated?
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade runs 2h 07m. It is an adventure and action film.
Where can I watch Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade in Croatia?
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is streaming on SkyShowtime in Croatia. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade compare to Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom?
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is the warmer and funnier of the two, while Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom has the better-built set pieces. The earlier film's raft, mine cart and bridge sequences outdo anything here, but it saddles itself with a heroine who only screams and a view of India that dates badly. Anyone who wants character over spectacle should choose the later film.
Do you need to have seen the other Indiana Jones films before Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade?
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade stands on its own and needs no knowledge of the earlier Indiana Jones films. The story introduces Indiana's father, Henry Jones, from scratch, and their disagreements are the heart of the film rather than any carried-over plot. A prologue with River Phoenix as the young Indy gives newcomers a starting point, and returning characters such as Marcus Brody and Sallah explain themselves in passing.
What should I watch after Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade?
After Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, try The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948, Fi1m 88): A rougher treasure hunt, with greed doing more damage than the terrain. Then Hunt for the Wilderpeople (2016, Fi1m 82): An irritable older man and a stubborn boy make unexpectedly affecting travelling companions; and The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938, Fi1m 90): Cleanly staged action and cheerful defiance, with no embarrassment about entertaining the audience.
What order should I watch the Indiana Jones films in?
Release order is the safe choice for Indiana Jones, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is number 3 of the 5 Indiana Jones titles on Fi1m; before it comes Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom and after it Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. The full order.

Part of · 3 of 5

Indiana Jones

5 films on Fi1m · 1981–2023 · average 71 · best Raiders of the Lost Ark 93

All 5 in order

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1990

Nominated
Best Original Score
Nominated
Best Sound
Won
Best Sound Editing

Hugo Awards, 1990

Won
Best Dramatic Presentation

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Man from Rio (1964) · not reviewed yetPhysical comedy and globe-trotting danger, with a hero forever struggling to keep up.

  2. The Man Who Would Be King (1975) · not reviewed yetConnery supplies more argumentative companionship, though this expedition takes ambition considerably more seriously.

  3. The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948, Fi1m 88)A rougher treasure hunt, with greed doing more damage than the terrain.

  4. Hunt for the Wilderpeople (2016, Fi1m 82)An irritable older man and a stubborn boy make unexpectedly affecting travelling companions.

  5. The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938, Fi1m 90)Cleanly staged action and cheerful defiance, with no embarrassment about entertaining the audience.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever