Film review

A Good Day to Die Hard

2013 · Directed by John Moore · 1h 38m · MPA R

In a sentenceBruce Willis keeps shouting that he is on holiday, and we came to wish he had stayed on it

ActionThriller

New York detective John McClane (Bruce Willis) learns that his estranged son Jack (Jai Courtney) has been arrested in Moscow, and flies over to bring him home. His daughter Lucy (Mary Elizabeth Winstead) sees him off at the airport, warning him not to make things worse. At the Moscow courthouse Jack is due to testify against Yuri Komarov (Sebastian Koch), a jailed businessman who holds a file that could ruin the politician Viktor Chagarin (Sergey Kolesnikov). A bomb goes off, gunmen led by Alik (Rasha Bukvic) storm the building, and Jack drives Komarov out through the back. McClane, expecting a delinquent, discovers his son is a CIA officer on an extraction, and the three of them end up in a van with half of Moscow’s traffic chasing them.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

The fifth Die Hard sends John McClane to Moscow, gives him a son to argue with and a great many cars to destroy, and forgets to give either of them a reason to be there. Loud, shapeless and poor, and most critics were right about it.

John Moore’s fifth Die Hard has one idea, and the tagline gives it away: take John McClane out of America and let him be rude to Russians. Skip Woods’s screenplay sends him to Moscow to collect his son Jack (Jai Courtney), who turns out not to be the delinquent his father assumed but a CIA officer in the middle of smuggling Yuri Komarov (Sebastian Koch) out of a courthouse. Komarov has a file. Viktor Chagarin (Sergey Kolesnikov) wants the file. Father and son bicker in the front seats of stolen vehicles while men with rifles pursue them. It runs 98 minutes and it is a poor film, and we are not going to argue with the twenty-one critics who have already said so.

The first big set piece is a chase through central Moscow, and it ought to have been the easy part. An armoured truck flattens saloon cars like drink cans, a lorry sheds its load across a flyover, and McClane drives over the roofs of a traffic jam. Jonathan Sela shoots it in grey daylight with a camera that will not hold still, and Dan Zimmerman cuts it so that no shot lasts long enough to tell us where anyone is. We were bored during a scene in which several dozen cars are destroyed, and then we were annoyed with ourselves for being bored, and then annoyed with the film for making it so easy. At no point did we know who was in front.

The man in the middle of it has done this four times before, and looks it. Willis plays McClane as a weary uncle who has wandered into someone else’s film, and his one joke, bellowing ‘I’m on vacation’ each time he is shot at, is repeated until it stops being a joke and becomes a tic. In 1988 McClane bled, limped, hid in a lift shaft and rang his wife. Here he falls through several floors of scaffolding, shakes off the glass and gets up. Nothing hurts him, so nothing matters. Courtney is a large young man with a firm jaw and no lines that could be mistaken for wit, and the two of them share a good deal of screen time saying ‘Dad’ and ‘Jack’ at each other in tones of irritation.

The Russians fare a little better. Koch gives Komarov a quiet, watchful softness, and he is the only actor in the film whose face seems to be thinking. Kolesnikov’s Chagarin mostly shouts into telephones. Rasha Bukvic’s Alik, the lead henchman, stops in the middle of a hostage situation to eat a raw carrot, do a few steps of a tap dance and explain how much he dislikes Americans, and we laughed, because for a minute the film seemed to know it was ridiculous. Yuliya Snigir, as Komarov’s daughter Irina, is handed a motorbike and an outfit and not much else in the first hour.

Daniel T. Dorrance’s production design gives the villains a hotel ballroom with chandeliers and long windows over the city, the handsomest room in the picture, and a helicopter then shoots it to powder in about a minute. That is the film’s method throughout: build something, then knock it down before we have had a proper look. Marco Beltrami’s score thumps under every scene, and the mix is so loud that whole exchanges of dialogue arrive as noise. The second half leaves the city and the stakes go up in a way we will not describe; the film gets sillier as they do.

It carries a 12A certificate, and it plays like a film that has been tidied up for one. The blood is brief, the swearing is clipped, and the famous catchphrase arrives so quietly and so late that it seems embarrassed to be there. Compared with its own series, this is the entry with the least in it: no building, no plan, no clock, no wife on the other end of the phone. Compared with the genre at large it is a mid-table chase film with a famous name on the poster.

Anyone wanting a Die Hard tonight should watch the first one again. Ninety-eight minutes is not long. It felt it.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

31
Positive
0
Mixed
1
Negative
21

The reviews are close to unanimous, and they are unkind. Of twenty-two we read, twenty-one are negative and none is positive. Most critics call this the weakest entry in the series, and the complaints cluster on one point: John McClane has become an invulnerable action figure, and once nothing can hurt him there is no tension left. What faint praise exists goes to the scale of the stunts, to Willis for holding his own in a few accounts, and, at The Hollywood Reporter, to the mercifully short running time.

The spread is narrow. Critics differ only on where to lay the blame: some on the Moscow setting, which several say could be anywhere; some on the father-son pairing with Jai Courtney, which The Wrap and Variety find flat and Digital Spy counts as the one fresh element. The single mixed verdict, from The AV Club, still calls it the worst film in the franchise, which tells you how the rest of the field reads.

The AV Club
14 February 2013 · C- · Scott Tobias
50

Labels it the worst film in the series by far, turning McClane into an invulnerable superhero with no tension or human cost. Singles out the lazy, obligatory script and the absence of any real stakes or vulnerability.

Read the full review →
Empire
14 February 2013 · Kim Newman
30*

The film fails to overcome the odds against a fifth entry in the series and suffers from being an unnecessary addendum to the original trilogy. The Moscow setting and father-son dynamic are singled out as missteps that undermine the action and supporting characters.

Read the full review →
Film Comment
· John Wildman
30*

The critic finds the film a tired, by-the-numbers sequel lacking imagination, zest or inventiveness, with a yawner plot, bland villains and little charisma from the cast including Willis and Courtney. Destruction and expected twists are delivered but fail to engage.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
13 February 2013
30*

The review calls the film an uninspired victory lap for the franchise, with big stunts but no heart or exhilaration. It singles out the pro-forma performance and muted catchphrases for complaint.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
12 February 2013 · Richard Roeper
30*

The critic finds the film a generic, explosion-filled action sequel that strips away character depth from John McClane. He singles out the over-the-top set pieces and lack of meaningful father-son connection for complaint.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
13 February 2013
30*

The franchise has lost its charm; the film lacks compelling villains or magnetic heroes and relies on overblown action that proves deadening.

Read the full review →

Cast

If you liked this, try…