Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) with arm around Marion Ravenwood (Karen Allen) in market
Film review

Raiders of the Lost Ark

1981 · Directed by Steven Spielberg · 1h 55m

In a sentenceHarrison Ford makes being chased by a boulder look like a difficult day at work

Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) moves from one dangerous encounter to the next in Steven Spielberg’s action-adventure. A rolling boulder is among the obstacles in his path. Karen Allen plays Marion Ravenwood, with Paul Freeman as Dr. René Belloq and John Rhys-Davies as Sallah. Ronald Lacey’s Major Arnold Toht and Wolf Kahler’s Colonel Dietrich also figure in Jones’s adventure, alongside Denholm Elliott’s Dr. Marcus Brody. Written by Lawrence Kasdan from a story by George Lucas and Philip Kaufman, the film follows Jones through chases, confrontations and narrow escapes.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Steven Spielberg’s adventure earns its excitement through clear action and Harrison Ford’s knack for looking battered but capable. We would recommend it to almost anyone, though its violence is rougher than the playful tone might suggest.

Raiders of the Lost Ark is an adventure we would recommend even to people who think they have had enough of chases. Steven Spielberg understands that speed alone will not keep us interested: we need to grasp the danger, wonder how anyone can escape it and care about the person attempting to do so. He makes that look straightforward, which it is not. The film draws on serial adventures without treating their pleasures as something to be embarrassed about.

Harrison Ford makes Indiana Jones worth following because he allows the effort to show. He looks determined enough to tackle the next obstacle and tired enough to regret it, which makes the physical punishment count. We laughed at how little dignity Ford brings to escaping the rolling boulder; he makes getting out alive seem quite enough to ask. His willingness to look harried keeps Jones likeable, even when the danger is plainly outlandish.

Karen Allen’s Marion Ravenwood is a welcome match for that performance, with enough force and humour to make us want more of her. Lawrence Kasdan’s screenplay is at its most enjoyable when it gives the actors room to spar rather than sending them towards the next emergency. Our reservation is that the appetite for another chase sometimes wins too easily. We would happily trade a little forward movement for longer in Allen’s company, especially when the dialogue is doing more than supplying information.

The truck chase shows how carefully the film makes a threat readable. Douglas Slocombe’s photography keeps the truck’s size and Ford’s vulnerability clear, so the danger never becomes a jumble of movement. Michael Kahn’s editing keeps the sequence urgent without making us work out what has happened after the danger has passed. We can anticipate trouble and still be startled by it. Few action films are so attentive to our need to understand where everyone is before they start moving again.

Norman Reynolds’s production design helps the hazards feel solid. The sets have a scale that makes Ford look exposed, and their apparent weight gives the stunt work something convincing to push against. Spielberg uses that space with a practical eye for how a body might move through it, so the scenery earns the attention it receives. We believe in the immediate physical difficulty even when the adventure is asking us to accept something unlikely.

John Williams’s music is generous with encouragement, making Jones sound a little more assured than Ford ever lets him appear. The score gives the action lift without smoothing away its roughness, and its readiness to enjoy the adventure matters. Spielberg is not pretending that this is sensible behaviour, but neither is he nudging us to feel superior to it. It is a relief to watch an adventure that does not keep apologising for being silly.

The caveat is the force of the violence, which can be more unsettling than the joking prepares us for. A PG certificate should not be taken to mean that every child will find the danger comfortably pretend. At 115 minutes, the film is brisk enough to make its occasional thinness between set pieces forgivable. Choose it for an evening when everyone wants an adventure, but do not assume the youngest person on the sofa will take the punishment as lightly as the adults.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

89
Positive
19
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The reviews are unanimous: nineteen in, all of them positive, and most treat the film as the high point of the series. The praise gathers around the set pieces, with the opening temple, the boulder and the desert truck chase named again and again, and around Harrison Ford, whose tired, rueful hero several critics consider his best work. Spielberg’s staging, the pace, John Williams’s score and the sparring between Ford and Karen Allen come up nearly as often, and more than one writer credits the film with setting the pattern for the modern blockbuster.

Reservations are scarce and small. The spread runs from roughly 70 to full marks, and the only cooler notice, from Total Film, concerns the IMAX re-release, where some effects look their age even as the boulder still lands. A few critics mention the theme-park pacing without minding it, and one or two read the film as a knowing parody of old serials rather than a straight adventure, which is as close to disagreement as the reviews get.

Evening Standard
12 March 2024 · ★★★★★ · William Mata
100

The critic ranks it the best in the Indiana Jones series and calls it the most even and complete film, possibly the best-executed Lucasfilm release. They single out the opening temple scene, classic moments like the propeller death and fedora save, and the genuinely scary Nazi villains.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

The critic calls it a definitive action masterpiece and breathless fantasy extravaganza. They praise the witty invention, raw spirit of adventure, and Spielberg at the height of his powers, especially the spine-tingling climactic effects.

Read the full review →
Time Out
23 September 2024 · ★★★★★ · Tom Huddleston
100

The critic hails it as the greatest adventure movie ever made. They single out Harrison Ford's wry, world-weary performance and the bone-crunching intensity of the central desert chase sequence.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
6 March 2020 · Tom Breihan
95*

The review celebrates Raiders as a perfect distillation of cliffhanging adventure serials into pure cinema and the ultimate Disneyland-style thrill ride. It praises the virtuoso staging of action set pieces, the self-conscious silliness, and the way it transforms spectacle into something enduringly entertaining.

Read the full review →
Empire
1 January 2000 · Danny Eccleston
90*

Spielberg delivers a note-perfect adventure movie and the start of a great franchise after the disappointment of 1941. The film excels through its spectacular set-pieces, brisk storytelling, and iconic moments like the improvised gun-vs-sword scene.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
30 April 2000 · Roger Ebert
90*

The film is a technical exercise and exuberant serial that succeeds as great entertainment while embedding Spielberg's anti-Nazi and religious themes. Harrison Ford embodies the indestructible hero at the center of nonstop action and fun.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Raiders of the Lost Ark worth watching?
Raiders of the Lost Ark is worth watching for almost anyone who wants an adventure that keeps its danger clear and its hero likeable, and we scored it 93. Harrison Ford lets the effort show, and Spielberg makes sure we always know where everyone is before the chase resumes. The violence is rougher than the jokes suggest, so the youngest viewers may find it less playful than the adults do.
How long is Raiders of the Lost Ark, and what is it rated?
Raiders of the Lost Ark runs 1h 55m. It is an adventure and action film.
Where can I watch Raiders of the Lost Ark in Türkiye?
Raiders of the Lost Ark is available to rent from Amazon Prime Video from ₺9.90. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does Raiders of the Lost Ark compare to Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom?
Raiders of the Lost Ark is the better film of the two, and by some distance. Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom has set pieces as well built as anything Spielberg has made, but its heroine only screams and its view of India should have embarrassed everyone involved. The earlier film gives Karen Allen a real part and keeps its sense of humour without the ugliness.
Do you need to have seen the other Indiana Jones films before Raiders of the Lost Ark?
Raiders of the Lost Ark needs no prior knowledge of the Indiana Jones series and is the natural place to start. It is a complete adventure on its own, moving Jones from one narrow escape to the next with everything you need to know supplied as it goes. Nothing in the later titles is required to follow or enjoy it.
What should I watch after Raiders of the Lost Ark?
After Raiders of the Lost Ark, try The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938, Fi1m 90): Swordplay, brisk romance and a hero who makes danger look inviting. Then The Mummy (1999, Fi1m 71): Ancient dangers and combative leads, with a similarly cheerful tolerance for nonsense; and The Adventures of Tintin (2011, Fi1m 77): Impossible chases with complications that remain easy to follow at speed.
What order should I watch the Indiana Jones films in?
Release order is the safe choice for Indiana Jones, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. Raiders of the Lost Ark is the first of the 5 Indiana Jones titles on Fi1m; after it Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom. The full order.

Part of · 1 of 5

Indiana Jones

5 films on Fi1m · 1981–2023 · average 71 · best Raiders of the Lost Ark 93

All 5 in order

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 1982

Nominated
Best Cinematography
Nominated
Best Director
Nominated
Best Original Score
Nominated
Best Picture
Won
Best Film Editing
Won
Best Production Design
Won
Best Sound
Won
Best Visual Effects

Hugo Awards, 1982

Won
Best Dramatic Presentation

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Adventures of Robin Hood (1938, Fi1m 90)Swordplay, brisk romance and a hero who makes danger look inviting.

  2. That Man from Rio (1964) · not reviewed yetA chase comedy with enough charm to make its recklessness forgivable.

  3. Police Story (1985) · not reviewed yetPhysical comedy and punishing stunts, with every awkward landing made to matter.

  4. The Mummy (1999, Fi1m 71)Ancient dangers and combative leads, with a similarly cheerful tolerance for nonsense.

  5. The Adventures of Tintin (2011, Fi1m 77)Impossible chases with complications that remain easy to follow at speed.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever