Film review

Batman Begins

2005 · Directed by Christopher Nolan · 2h 20m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceChristian Bale makes dressing as a bat seem like a decision worth hearing out

DramaCrimeAction

Bruce Wayne (Christian Bale) begins the journey towards becoming Batman in Christopher Nolan’s account of the masked crime-fighter’s origins. Martial arts training and practical technology form part of his preparation, while his reasons for taking on crime raise questions about revenge and justice. Gotham is the setting for a story concerned with the man inside the suit as well as his opponents. Michael Caine plays Alfred, Gary Oldman is Jim Gordon and Katie Holmes plays Rachel Dawes. Liam Neeson appears as Ducard, with Cillian Murphy as Dr. Jonathan Crane and Morgan Freeman as Lucius Fox.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Christopher Nolan gives Bruce Wayne enough weight to make Batman convincing, with Christian Bale supplying the anger and restraint. The fights can be difficult to follow and the running time is generous, but this is a superhero film worth taking seriously.

Christopher Nolan’s Batman Begins is a persuasive superhero origin story, and we recommend it with one substantial caveat: the fighting is sometimes harder to follow than the psychology. Nolan takes Bruce Wayne seriously enough to spend time making Batman seem like a plausible choice. The martial arts preparation and practical technology help, but neither would matter without a convincing man using them. Christian Bale supplies that man, giving Bruce enough suppressed anger to make the disguise feel necessary.

Bale’s inward performance is the film’s strongest reason to stay interested through its lengthy preparation. We can sense the effort Bruce puts into containing himself, and the menace comes from wondering how much longer he can manage it. Nolan and co-writer David S. Goyer give revenge and justice enough attention for the distinction to matter, though they can be laborious about it. Some of that explanation could go; Bale has already given us enough to understand.

Michael Caine’s Alfred, Morgan Freeman’s Lucius Fox and Gary Oldman’s Jim Gordon help by treating the material without embarrassment. Their performances give us some relief from a lead whose intensity could otherwise become wearing. Caine and Freeman are particularly useful at keeping the seriousness from turning pompous, while Oldman makes decency worth watching. There is pleasure in a supporting cast that can establish character without demanding a separate display of importance, especially in a film already carrying so much explanation.

Wally Pfister’s cinematography gives the darkness enough weight to make Gotham oppressive, and Nathan Crowley’s production design makes it feel inhabited. The city is convincing without needing to be pleasant to look at. That helps Cillian Murphy’s Dr. Jonathan Crane seem to belong here, and his performance is one of the film’s sharpest supporting contributions. We were unsettled by Murphy’s composure, because it makes Crane’s hostility feel considered and deliberate.

The weakness is in how Nolan and editor Lee Smith handle close combat. The cutting too often makes it difficult to tell what a blow has done or where the next one comes from, which is a poor exchange for urgency. The larger action has force, but individual fights can leave us waiting for the confusion to clear. Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard’s score adds pressure, occasionally pushing harder than the scene needs. When Bale is already making Bruce’s agitation plain, the music can afford to leave him alone.

At 140 minutes, the film also asks for more patience than all its explanations deserve. Nolan and Goyer have plenty to establish, but the competing strands do not always feel equally necessary, and the villains receive less care than Bruce. Even Murphy’s unsettling presence cannot make every threat as interesting as the troubled man facing it. The preparation mostly earns its place, although there are stretches when we are ready to move on.

There is room here to question Bruce’s thinking. That is welcome in a superhero film: the attention to revenge and justice gives us something to consider beyond how efficiently the hero can win a fight. Give it an evening when a slow build sounds appealing, and do not expect to follow every punch.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

5 of 6
Positive
4
Mixed
1
Negative
0
Empire
· Kim Newman
85*

The critic praises Nolan's radically different, grittier take on the character, emphasizing psychological depth, a realistic Gotham, strong performances (especially Bale), and effective action sequences that help DC compete with Marvel adaptations.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
17 June 2005 · Philip French
75*

The critic finds the film a big, bold and dark reset for the franchise with an elaborate new backstory for Batman, crediting Nolan for restoring depth after previous missteps. It singles out the Asian martial arts influence for bolstering the hero's credibility and Cillian Murphy's sinister performance as a standout element.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
12 June 2005 · Nick Schager
55*

The critic finds Nolan's reboot a somber, atmospheric take on the character that gets under the cape and cowl with its pessimistic tone and real-world tech details, but faults the cluttered three-story structure, weak villains, and poorly staged fight scenes.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
13 June 2005 · Roger Ebert

The critic praises the film for finally penetrating the dark and troubled depths of the Batman legend with persuasive character development and emphasis on story over high-tech action. He singles out the atmospheric direction, Bale's inward performance as Wayne, and the grounded, shadowy production design.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 July 2005 · Edward Lawrenson

Nolan brings a distinctive stamp to the Batman origin story with psychological depth and assured direction, though the film runs too long. The critic praises the robust set pieces, psychological shading of Bruce Wayne, and subtle handling of themes like revenge and justice.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
17 June 2005 · Manohla Dargis

The critic celebrates the film as the first to usher Batman into the kingdom of movie myth through Nolan's serious treatment of the material and focus on Bruce Wayne's humanity. She singles out Bale's superbly menacing performance and the director's rescue of the character from previous campy incarnations.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 2006

Nominated
Best Cinematography

If you liked this, try…

Unbreakable poster81

Unbreakable

2000 · Another superhero origin that takes its troubled central character seriously.

Batman: Mask of the Phantasm poster

Batman: Mask of the Phantasm

1993 · Animation gives Batman’s private grief room alongside the crime fighting.

Le Samouraï poster

Le Samouraï

1967 · For the controlled performance, criminal atmosphere and careful attention to professional routine.

A Bittersweet Life poster

A Bittersweet Life

2005 · A solitary man’s violence meets a criminal world with little patience for conscience.

The Mask of Zorro poster

The Mask of Zorro

1998 · A lighter masked avenger, with training that earns its place in the adventure.