Film review

Terminator 2: Judgment Day

1991 · Directed by James Cameron · 2h 17m · MPA R

In a sentenceArnold Schwarzenegger makes a persuasive case for leaving the childcare to heavy machinery

ActionThrillerScience Fiction

Arnold Schwarzenegger returns as the Terminator, now a protector in a conflict involving Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton) and John Connor (Edward Furlong). Their opponent is the T-1000 (Robert Patrick), a cyborg made of liquid metal. As the pursuit brings chases and confrontations, the Terminator’s capacity for violence sits alongside a growing capacity for care. James Cameron directs and co-writes with William Wisher, combining science fiction and action with a story about the danger of nuclear destruction. Sarah and John provide the human centre as machines take opposing sides in the struggle.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

James Cameron makes the chases exhilarating and gives Arnold Schwarzenegger room to be funny, without quite disguising the overlong middle. Linda Hamilton keeps the sentiment from becoming too comfortable.

Terminator 2: Judgment Day takes a risk that action sequels usually avoid: it changes what we are meant to want from its most recognisable character. James Cameron makes Arnold Schwarzenegger’s Terminator a protector, then asks us to enjoy his growing capacity for care alongside the destruction. It works remarkably well, helped by Schwarzenegger’s dry comic timing and Cameron’s ability to make a chase feel urgent. We recommend it warmly, with a warning about the middle stretch, where the explanations last longer than they need to.

Robert Patrick’s T-1000 is a large part of the reason the gentler Terminator remains interesting. The liquid-metal effects give Cameron an opponent whose body is itself a source of suspense, and Patrick’s controlled performance keeps the spectacle from becoming a demonstration. We were unsettled by that shifting metal. It makes the familiar action-film reassurance of a solid, hittable enemy difficult to hold on to. Patrick is frightening without competing with Schwarzenegger for size or comic attention.

Adam Greenberg’s cinematography helps by keeping the effects readable within the action; we can take in the changing metal without losing the sense of pursuit. Editors Conrad Buff IV, Richard A. Harris and Mark Goldblatt give the chases enough continuity for danger to build from one movement to the next. The excitement depends on understanding what might happen, rather than simply registering another impact. That sounds elementary, but action films regularly spend whole sequences preventing us from getting our bearings, and Cameron has the confidence to let us look.

Joseph C. Nemec III’s production design helps the physical destruction compete for our attention with the liquid-metal effects. Brad Fiedel’s score maintains pressure through the pauses, so the action does not have to start building its tension from nothing each time. Both contributions matter to how sustained the excitement feels. Cameron can be excessive, but the confrontations remain involving well beyond the novelty of the effects.

Linda Hamilton gives Sarah Connor enough anger to complicate the film’s softer impulses. Her performance makes the danger feel personal, even when the writing is busy explaining how much is at stake. Edward Furlong, as John Connor, brings a less forbidding presence, and the contrast helps Schwarzenegger’s new role settle into something more than a joke. Schwarzenegger is funny because he allows the concern to remain awkward; he does not suddenly become an easy, reassuring companion. These performances give Cameron room to be sentimental, and for much of the film the feeling seems earned.

James Cameron and co-writer William Wisher are less persuasive when they insist on explaining the film’s opposition to nuclear destruction. The narration presses points that the action and performances have already made, while the middle loses the briskness that makes the chases so satisfying. At 137 minutes, the film has time for character, but it also has time to repeat itself. The wish to make all this violence mean something is welcome; a little less explanation would have given the actors more room.

As a sequel, it gets away with softening its central menace because it has found a formidable replacement in Patrick. Changing the Terminator gives Schwarzenegger something to play through the quieter scenes, where another round of destruction would become exhausting. We can forgive the occasional lecture when the action is this clear and the people remain worth worrying about. Give it the largest screen available, and a little patience when Cameron starts explaining himself.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

79
Positive
6
Mixed
0
Negative
1

Most critics welcome Terminator 2: Judgment Day as an accomplished action sequel, with praise concentrated on Cameron’s handling of chases and set pieces and the liquid-metal effects of the T-1000. The performances also draw approval: Schwarzenegger’s comic timing and gentler character give the action warmth, while Linda Hamilton supplies commitment and human depth. The broad agreement is that the film expands the original’s spectacle without losing its capacity to entertain.

The reservations concern pacing, sentimentality and how clearly the film expresses its anti-nuclear message. Several reviews find the middle section slack or the writing overwhelmed by action, though these objections rarely undo their enthusiasm. There is less agreement about whether the sequel develops the original’s ideas or merely enlarges its effects. The New Yorker supplies the sharpest dissent, finding the narrative monotonous and the message heavy-handed despite admiring the action and effects.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

Cameron delivers hard-edged humour and rollercoaster action in a worthy sequel, with standout liquid-metal effects and Hamilton's committed performance adding human depth to the mayhem.

Read the full review →
Empire
16 August 1991 · Kim Newman
80*

The critic praises the film's spectacular action sequences and groundbreaking visual effects, particularly the liquid metal T-1000 villain. While noting it is less conceptually ambitious than the original, it delivers top-notch entertainment with impressive set pieces.

Read the full review →
Time Out
· GA
70*

The review notes that the film builds on the original with more spectacular effects and a good-guy twist for Schwarzenegger's character, but criticizes the sentimentality and a sagging middle section amid strong chase sequences.

Read the full review →
The New Yorker
29 July 1991
40*

The sequel is far less satisfying than the original, with a narrative that is lumbering and monotonous despite spectacular action sequences and dazzling effects. It carries a heavy-handed anti-nuke message.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
3 July 1991 · Kenneth Turan

Cameron has built one hell of a wild ride, a Twilight of the Gods that combines successful elements of the predecessor with new twists to produce a film that takes no prisoners. Most of all, Cameron’s intuitive understanding of the mechanics and psychology of action films makes it come alive.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
1 September 1991 · J. Hoberman

The critic views Terminator 2 as a spectacular, expensive sequel that redeems the Terminator character in an E.T.-like story while delivering relentless action and effects. It humanizes Schwarzenegger's cyborg amid pyrotechnics and anti-nuclear themes.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

Awards

Academy Awards, 1992

Nominated
Best Cinematography
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Won
Best Makeup and Hairstyling
Won
Best Sound
Won
Best Sound Editing
Won
Best Visual Effects

Hugo Awards, 1992

Won
Best Dramatic Presentation

Saturn Awards, 1992

Won
Best Science Fiction Film

If you liked this, try…

Aliens poster

Aliens

1986 · Cameron’s other approach to the action sequel, with fear and maternal fury

Police Story poster

Police Story

1985 · For physical action staged so clearly that every dangerous movement counts

The Iron Giant poster91

The Iron Giant

1999 · Another formidable machine learns gentleness, with less gunfire and considerable feeling

The Host poster

The Host

2006 · A family faces a creature, while humour makes the panic more human

Metropolis poster

Metropolis

1927 · For machines and human vulnerability on a scale that still impresses