Avatar: Fire and Ash poster

Avatar: Fire and Ash

2025 · Directed by James Cameron
3h 18mScience FictionAdventureFantasy12A
58
Fi1m score
57
Critics · 14
Audience · not yet

Where to watch in the UK

Checked 10 September at 22:28. Prices and availability change; the service’s page is the last word.

Synopsis

James Cameron returns to Pandora for a third film. Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and Neytiri (Zoe Saldaña), with their children and the reef clans of Ronal (Kate Winslet) and Tonowari (Cliff Curtis), face a new enemy from the moon’s volcanic country: Varang (Oona Chaplin), leader of a Na’vi clan who live among fire and ash and have no love for the forest people. Quaritch (Stephen Lang) is still hunting the Sullys, and Spider (Jack Champion), the human boy raised alongside their children, finds his place in the family harder to hold. Sigourney Weaver returns as Kiri, with Edie Falco as General Ardmore and Joel David Moore as Norm.

Fi1m review

In a sentenceFive credited editors, 198 minutes, and the same war as last time, now with a volcano

Cameron’s third visit to Pandora is as beautifully built as the first two, and it goes somewhere new only in its scenery. Oona Chaplin’s Varang is a proper villain; the film around her repeats itself for well over three hours.

James Cameron has been on Pandora since 2009, and Avatar: Fire and Ash is the third film he has brought back from it. Jake Sully (Sam Worthington) and Neytiri (Zoe Saldaña) and their children are at war again, this time with a Na’vi clan from the moon’s volcanic country, led by Varang (Oona Chaplin), and again with Quaritch (Stephen Lang), who has not stopped hunting them. It runs 198 minutes. Like the two before it, it is built to a standard nobody else in the business is working to, and it is the first of the three that left us feeling we had seen it before.

Start with what there is to see, because there is a great deal. Russell Carpenter shoots the ash country in reds and charcoal, so that when the fire clan attacks at night the flames light the Na’vi from below and the blue skin goes purple. Dylan Cole and Ben Procter, the production designers, give the new region a proper geography rather than a backdrop, and a long sequence with a clan called the Windtraders is the best stretch of new invention in the film. Deborah L. Scott dresses Varang’s people as if they have walked through the fire rather than round it. In a cinema, in three dimensions, the depth of it still does something to the stomach.

Chaplin is the reason to go. She plays Varang with an appetite the series has never permitted a villain: she enjoys her cruelty, she enjoys her weapons, and she looks at Quaritch in a way nobody has looked at him in three films. Most critics have picked her out and they are right. Lang is still doing the growl and it is still a good growl, though this is the third time he has snarled the same threat at the same family. Edie Falco, as General Ardmore, gets little to do and does it briskly.

The trouble is the script, by Cameron with Rick Jaffa and Amanda Silver, and the trouble is that we have read it. The Sullys are threatened, the Sullys move, the Sullys are found, there is a battle, and then the shape repeats. The Way of Water did the same, but it had a whole ocean to discover while it did it. Here the new element is fire, and there is not much to swim through in fire. The dialogue is what it has always been: people announce what they feel and then feel it. Worthington is given the word family and says it often. Saldaña gets the film’s rage, and is good at it.

Five editors are credited, Cameron among them, alongside Jason Gaudio, Nicolas De Toth, Stephen E. Rivkin and John Refoua. Between them they could not find forty minutes to lose, and there are forty minutes to lose.

And yet. There is a stretch in the middle about Spider (Jack Champion), the human boy the Sullys have half-adopted, and what the family owes him and what it does not, and it moved us more than we were ready for. Champion plays him as a teenager who knows exactly how much he is tolerated, and Cameron, for once, lets a scene go quiet and stay quiet. Then the third hour arrived, and we noticed we were counting the battles, and then that we were annoyed at being made to count. Simon Franglen’s score rises at each one to tell us this is the important one, and after the fourth time we stopped believing it.

Aliens (1986) and Terminator 2 (1991) each had one idea and ran it to the end. The Avatar films have one idea too, and it was all said in 2009. What has changed since is the machinery, and Cameron now appears to trust the machinery to carry the story on its own.

See it in a cinema or leave it. On a big screen the ash country and the sea battles hold you by size alone, and the three hours pass faster than they have any right to. At home the same pictures will look like an expensive cartoon about a family who keep having the same argument.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

57
Positive
6
Mixed
3
Negative
5

The reviews split widely, from raves to flat dismissals, and the split is about story rather than craft. Almost every critic agrees the spectacle is the draw: the 3D, the fire-lit volcanic landscapes and the land, sea and sky battles are described as immersive and technically superb, and Oona Chaplin’s Varang is repeatedly singled out as the freshest thing in it. The reservations cluster just as tightly. Most critics find the plot a rerun of the second film, with a family drama that runs long, dialogue that clunks and battles that repeat until fatigue sets in. The Guardian and The Telegraph call it dull and creatively stuck; The Wrap finds its anti-corporate message undercut by its own origins. The dissenters in the other direction are notable: /Film calls it the best of the series, while Polygon and The Ringer argue the Spider storyline gives it a heart the sceptics miss. The consensus is admiration for the machine and boredom with the script.

Evening Standard
17 December 2025 · ★★★★ · Nick Howells
80

The technical spectacle and 3D immersion are unsurpassed, plunging viewers into relentless action and a phosphorescent world, though the familiar story of tribal conflicts and earnest themes lacks sophistication.

Read the full review →
Vulture
16 December 2025 · Bilge Ebiri
80*

The critic finds it the richest and craziest of the Avatar films, with Cameron fully indulging his vision and remixing his motifs in an expertly realized, never-boring spectacle. They single out the freewheeling earnestness and the tactile, vivid world of Pandora for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
18 December 2025 · Manohla Dargis
55*

The critic finds the film a dizzying overload of new creatures, landscapes, melodramatic plots and battles that ultimately produces whiplash rather than transport. Cameron’s signature mix of pulp and poetry is on display but fails to cohere here.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 December 2025 · Peter Bradshaw
30*

The critic finds the third Avatar film a gigantically dull and uninteresting spectacle that fails to deliver an emotional arc despite its volcanic world-building and action. The new character Varang adds a witchy sex interest but cannot salvage the repetitive, impervious franchise entry.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
16 December 2025 · David Rooney
30*

The critic views it as the most repetitious entry in the series, with fatigue setting in despite the spectacle and Oona Chaplin's standout witchy villainy. They single out the lack of fresh narrative inspiration and risible dialogue for complaint.

Read the full review →
The i Paper
17 December 2025 · Sarah Carson
30*

The film is interminable and repetitive with a thin plot full of clichés, relying on flashy 3D effects and battles that feel like a theme-park ride rather than meaningful cinema or storytelling.

Read the full review →

Cast

Stills

If you liked this, try…

Princess Mononoke poster

Princess Mononoke

1997 · Forest gods, iron works and a war where both sides have a case; Miyazaki did this first.

The Emerald Forest poster

The Emerald Forest

1985 · A white boy raised by an Amazon tribe; Spider’s dilemma, played straight and in the real jungle.

Dune: Part Two poster84

Dune: Part Two

2024 · Desert war, a messiah nobody asked for, and set pieces that know when to stop.

Aguirre, the Wrath of God poster

Aguirre, the Wrath of God

1972 · Herzog sends conquistadors down a river and lets the jungle win; ninety minutes, no volcano needed.

Embrace of the Serpent poster

Embrace of the Serpent

2015 · Two explorers, one Amazon shaman, and colonial ruin told from the riverbank rather than the boat.