Film review

Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire

2005 · Directed by Mike Newell · 2h 37m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceDragons, mermaids and a dark lord, and the most frightening thing in it is asking a girl to the ball

AdventureFantasy

Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) begins his fourth year at Hogwarts after a summer that ends badly: at the Quidditch World Cup, Death Eaters burn the campsite and a skull is cast into the sky. Back at school, Albus Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) announces the Triwizard Tournament, a contest between three wizarding schools, and pupils arrive from Durmstrang under Igor Karkaroff (Predrag Bjelac) and from Beauxbatons, among them Fleur Delacour (Clémence Poésy). Entrants must be seventeen. Harry is fourteen, and his name comes out of the goblet anyway, alongside Cedric Diggory (Robert Pattinson). Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint) thinks he cheated; Hermione Granger (Emma Watson) is caught between them. A new teacher, Alastor ‘Mad-Eye’ Moody (Brendan Gleeson), watches everything, and Harry has begun dreaming of an old house and a voice he knows.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Mike Newell’s Potter is the first to feel like it was made by someone who remembers being fourteen. The tournament set pieces are noisy and the plot is shoved through at a run, but the ball, Gleeson and the ending are worth the wait.

Mike Newell’s Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire is the fourth film and the first to carry a 12A, and it earns the certificate. The plot: Hogwarts hosts the Triwizard Tournament, a schools competition with dragons in it, and Harry’s name comes out of the goblet when it should not. Steve Kloves has cut J.K. Rowling’s novel to 157 minutes, dropping the Dursleys and most of the Ministry, and the film still moves at a sprint. What Newell has grasped, and the earlier directors did not quite, is that a fourteen-year-old is more frightened of the girl across the classroom than of anything with scales.

So the best scenes have no effects in them. Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint) unwraps a set of maroon dress robes with lace at the cuffs and holds them as if they had died. The boys are made to waltz with each other in a dancing lesson. Alan Rickman’s Snape patrols a silent study hall and clips heads as he passes. Grint is the funniest he has been, and his sulk about Hermione’s date carries the whole Yule Ball sequence; Emma Watson plays the end of that evening on the staircase and gets it right. We laughed at the robes and then felt for the boy in them, which is the right order.

Brendan Gleeson arrives as Alastor ‘Mad-Eye’ Moody with a wooden leg, a hip flask and a glass eye that swivels on its own, and he treats the part as a licence to frighten children for their own good. His first lesson is an interrogation with hexes. He is the film’s best new thing, and Newell holds on him a beat longer than the plot requires. Michael Gambon’s Dumbledore has become a shouter; when he grabs Harry by the collar it is the first time this Dumbledore has looked worried, and it helps.

Stuart Craig builds the World Cup stadium as a tower of tents and turns the Great Hall into a room of ice for the ball. Roger Pratt shoots the castle in November greys, then lights the ball gold, so it is the one place in the film anyone looks happy to be. Jany Temime’s costumes do a good deal of the storytelling: the Durmstrang boys in fur, the Beauxbatons girls in blue silk, the Weasleys in whatever was left. Patrick Doyle takes over the music and writes a proper waltz for the occasion; his tournament cues are brass and hurry.

The tournament is the trouble. The first task puts a dragon in an arena and then lets it out to chase Harry over the castle roofs, and once it is a chase it looks like every other chase. The second, underwater, is murky and long. Newell has no particular eye for action, and Mick Audsley cuts the set pieces hard to disguise it. Audsley has the harder job elsewhere, because the film keeps arriving at scenes it has not set up: the World Cup ends before a ball is thrown, and anyone who has not read the book will not know who Barty Crouch is or why the courtroom in Harry’s dream matters. David Tennant, as Barty Crouch Junior, flicks his tongue and is gone. We were bored in the lake and knew we were meant to be thrilled, which is worse.

Then Ralph Fiennes arrives, late, as Lord Voldemort, and we will say nothing about the circumstances. He plays him in a whisper, with a face that has lost its nose, and the film goes quiet for him; for perhaps ten minutes this is a horror film and a good one. We were unnerved, in a 12A, and had not expected to be. Daniel Radcliffe spends much of the film looking as if he is waiting for his cue and is at his best here, with nothing to do but be afraid. Robert Pattinson’s Cedric Diggory is upright, decent and slightly dull, which is the part.

Alfonso Cuarón’s Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban (2004) is the better-made film, shapelier and stranger. Newell’s is warmer and has too much in it. See it if you were ever fourteen and remember it without fondness, or if you have read the book and can forgive what the film threw away. Everyone else should sit through the tournament, keep a reader within reach, and wait for the ball and the last twenty minutes.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

69
Positive
12
Mixed
3
Negative
1

Most critics welcome this fourth film as the darkest and most grown-up of the series so far, and the credit goes largely to Mike Newell. The reviews agree that he draws better performances from the young leads than his predecessors did, with Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grint singled out, and that Ralph Fiennes’s Voldemort and Brendan Gleeson’s new teacher are the strongest additions. Several critics find more feeling in the teenage awkwardness of the Yule Ball than in the tournament itself.

The reservations cluster on length. Compressing a long novel into more than two and a half hours leaves the editing choppy and the plot hard to follow for anyone who has not read the book. Slant and Sight and Sound both find Newell has little gift for action sequences, and Screen Daily and Eye for Film think it lacks the distinctiveness of the previous film. The spread is wide: two reviews call it the best in the series, while Sight and Sound is the lone outright dissent.

Los Angeles Times
19 November 2005 · Kenneth Turan
90*

Newell finally gets the series right with a wire-to-wire satisfying adventure that captures the books' excitement, featuring convincing new cast members and a natural heroism from Radcliffe's Harry.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
★★★★
80

The review hails the film as the best in the series to date for its greater depth, sorrow and fear factor, especially in scenes with Ralph Fiennes as Voldemort, crediting Mike Newell with revitalising the franchise while noting some dull stretches in its long runtime.

Read the full review →
Empire
· Angie Errigo
75*

The critic praises the special effects action sequences, charm, and emotional depth brought to the young leads' performances while noting the director handles personal elements well. They criticize the challenges of compressing the lengthy novel, resulting in choppy editing and some unnecessary subplots.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
16 November 2005 · Tasha Robinson
75*

The film is a well-acted, vividly executed special-effects extravaganza that pares the story to essentials while retaining momentum for fans. Newell and Kloves make reasonable cuts but the result still feels bulky at over two and a half hours.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
10 April 2012 · Derek Malcolm
70*

The critic highlights the film's focus on character and psychological insight, with strong performances from the young leads especially Rupert Grint, and notes it adds elements like sex and school memories. They express some skepticism about the source material's storytelling but conclude that fans will enjoy the sweep and intimacy of the adaptation.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
17 November 2005 · Roger Ebert
70*

The film turns darker and more violent as Harry faces the Triwizard Tournament and Voldemort's return, balancing whimsy with ominous threats through strong performances and effective direction.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2006

Nominated
Best Production Design

BAFTA Film Awards, 2006

Nominated
BAFTA's Children & Young People Award - Feature Film
Nominated
Best Makeup and Hair
Nominated
Best Special Visual Effects

Hugo Awards, 2006

Nominated
Best Dramatic Presentation, Long Form

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 2006

Won
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

MTV Movie Award for Best Hero, 2006

Nominated
MTV Movie Award for Best Hero

MTV Movie Award for Best On-Screen Duo, 2006

Nominated
MTV Movie Award for Best On-Screen Duo

MTV Movie Award for Best Villain, 2006

Nominated
MTV Movie Award for Best Villain

Teen Choice Award for Choice Movie - Drama, 2006

Won
Teen Choice Award for Choice Movie - Drama

Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Family Film, 2005

Nominated
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Family Film

Satellite Award for Best Costume Design, 2005

Nominated
Satellite Award for Best Costume Design

Saturn Awards, 2005

Nominated
Best Costume

If you liked this, try…