Film review

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone

2001 · Directed by Chris Columbus · 2h 32m · MPA PG

In a sentenceThe school is the star, the children are trying hard, and John Williams will not stop

AdventureFantasy

Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) is an orphan of ten who sleeps in a cupboard at 4 Privet Drive, bullied by his Uncle Vernon (Richard Griffiths) and Aunt Petunia (Fiona Shaw). Letters begin to arrive, and his uncle burns them. On his eleventh birthday a giant, Hagrid (Robbie Coltrane), breaks down the door and tells him he is a wizard, that his parents were too, and that a place is waiting at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. Hagrid takes him shopping in Diagon Alley, where Mr Ollivander (John Hurt) sells him a wand, then puts him on a scarlet train from Platform Nine and Three-Quarters. On board he meets Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint) and Hermione Granger (Emma Watson), and snubs a sneering Draco Malfoy (Tom Felton).

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Chris Columbus has put J.K. Rowling’s book on screen in order, with nothing broken and nothing risked. Stuart Craig’s Hogwarts is worth the ticket on its own; the film around it is faithful, handsome and forty minutes too long.

Chris Columbus was handed a book its readers knew by heart and asked not to break it. He has not broken it. Working from Steve Kloves’s screenplay, he puts J.K. Rowling’s novel on the screen chapter by chapter, at 152 minutes, and the result is exactly what the title promises: an adaptation. It is well built, well cast and cautious to the bone. Children will love it. Adults will find plenty to look at and, somewhere past the ninety-minute mark, will look at their watches.

The opening hour is the best of it, because it is the hour with a shape. Harry (Daniel Radcliffe) lives in a cupboard at Privet Drive with an uncle (Richard Griffiths) who goes purple and an aunt (Fiona Shaw) who goes thin-lipped, and the pair of them play the Dursleys as a short, sharp cartoon of suburban meanness. Then Hagrid (Robbie Coltrane) arrives with a squashed birthday cake, and the film opens like a door. Diagon Alley leans in over the street, John Hurt’s Mr Ollivander stands among his wand boxes as if he has not left the shop in a century, and a train pulls out from a platform that should not exist. Every scene has a new thing in it, and the new things are good.

Stuart Craig’s production design is the reason to see this in the largest form you can. His Hogwarts is stone, dark wood and candle grease, a real school that has been left to a thousand years of eccentrics, and John Seale lights it with lamps and fires so the light is always the colour of something burning. We will own the moment: when the first-years walk into the Great Hall under its floating candles and painted sky, we felt a lift we had not budgeted for, and it came from the set, not from the story. Judianna Makovsky’s robes are heavy black wool that moves like school uniform, which is what it is, and Hagrid’s moleskin coat looks as though small animals live in it.

The grown-ups are cast with care and used sparingly. Coltrane is warm, huge and slightly out of his depth, which is right for Hagrid. Maggie Smith’s McGonagall can silence a corridor with one look over her spectacles. Richard Harris plays Dumbledore as a man who has forgotten more than the rest of the staff will ever know and does not mind. And Alan Rickman, as Snape, gets perhaps six minutes of screen time and steals every one of them, drawing out his vowels as if each were a pupil he was disappointed in. The children are children. Radcliffe is watchful and open and not yet an actor; Rupert Grint has a rubber face and knows it; Emma Watson pronounces every syllable as though it were being marked. Tom Felton sneers competently.

What goes wrong is measure. John Williams has written a lovely score, and the tinkling melody that opens the film is one of his best, but it is under everything, swelling at every doorway and every reveal, telling us to feel wonder while Craig’s sets were already doing the job. Richard Francis-Bruce cuts the Quidditch match into a blur of broomsticks and balls, fast and loud and hard to follow, and the film’s one set piece of pure action turns out to be its least legible sequence. And there is simply too much. Columbus keeps every episode because the readers would miss it, and so the second half becomes a list: a lesson, a corridor, a lesson, a feast. Around the two-hour mark we were restless, and then faintly cross at being restless in a room this well furnished.

Columbus made Home Alone (1990), and he directs children the same way here, for broad reactions and quick laughs, which serves the Dursleys and lets down the quieter scenes. He is a safe pair of hands, and safe is what the producers wanted. Set against the children’s fantasies that frightened us as children, Nicolas Roeg’s The Witches (1990) chief among them, this has almost no edge at all; the one moment near the end that does unsettle, and we will not describe it, is over in a minute.

Watch it at home, with a child if you have one to hand and with the volume a notch lower than you would choose. The sets survive the small screen, the score becomes bearable, and the length matters less when you can pause for tea. It carries a PG and it earns it, just.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

66
Positive
9
Mixed
6
Negative
1
The Independent
5 November 2001
90*

The film is a remarkably solid piece of work with rich production values and headlong adventure, balancing flighty magic with grounded angst in an old-fashioned story of courage and belonging.

Read the full review →
Radio Times
★★★★ · Andrew Collins
80

This CGI-packed fantasy adventure is more than just a big-budget movie adaptation – it’s a cultural phenomenon. Daniel Radcliffe makes a likeable Harry and the cast breathes life into the characters, though there is a lack of emotional core and the film is too long.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
16 November 2001 · ★★★★ · Peter Bradshaw
80

The film is a richly accomplished entertainment spectacular and the quickest, zappiest two and a half hours in the cinema. It is tightly respectful of the book with staggering special effects and strong performances from the young cast and supporting British actors.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
5 November 2001 · John Hiscock
80*

The film succeeds triumphantly in meeting the challenge of adapting the book faithfully. It is a visual and emotional treat with impressive effects, though some book details are omitted.

Read the full review →
The Times
29 October 2021 · ★★★★ · Kevin Maher
80

The 20th-anniversary rerelease holds up remarkably well with a gorgeous fairytale innocence and ingenuous acting from the young cast. The Quidditch scenes feel synthetic but the final confrontation remains disturbing.

Read the full review →
Time Out
3 December 2021 · BC
80*

The boarding school stuff is terrific and the lessons quick and funny; Quidditch is as fast as Top Gun but then becomes incomprehensible. A long, engrossing feast for children that kids will love.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2002

Nominated
Best Costume Design
Nominated
Best Original Score
Nominated
Best Production Design

BAFTA Film Awards, 2002

Nominated
BAFTA's Children & Young People Award - Feature Film
Nominated
Best Actor in a Supporting Role
Nominated
Best British Film
Nominated
Best Makeup and Hair
Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Special Visual Effects

Hugo Awards, 2002

Nominated
Best Dramatic Presentation

Japan Academy Prize for Outstanding Foreign Language Film, 2002

Nominated
Japan Academy Prize for Outstanding Foreign Language Film

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 2002

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

Producers Guild of America Award for Best Theatrical Motion Picture, 2002

Nominated
Producers Guild of America Award for Best Theatrical Motion Picture

Satellite Award for Best Animated or Mixed Media Feature, 2002

Nominated
Satellite Award for Best Animated or Mixed Media Feature

Satellite Award for Best Art Direction and Production Design, 2002

Nominated
Satellite Award for Best Art Direction and Production Design

Satellite Award for Best Editing, 2002

Nominated
Satellite Award for Best Editing

Satellite Award for Best Visual Effects, 2002

Nominated
Satellite Award for Best Visual Effects

Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Composer, 2001

Nominated
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Composer

Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Family Film, 2001

Won
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Family Film

Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Young Performer, 2001

Nominated
Broadcast Film Critics Association Award for Best Young Performer

Saturn Awards, 2001

Won
Best Costume

If you liked this, try…

The Witches poster

The Witches

1990 · Roeg’s Roald Dahl film has the menace this one politely leaves out

Spirited Away poster92

Spirited Away

2001 · A child in a strange school of spirits, drawn with far stranger imagination

Matilda poster

Matilda

1996 · Another gifted child, ghastly guardians and a headmistress worth fearing

A Little Princess poster

A Little Princess

1995 · Cuarón’s boarding-school orphan story, lit like a storybook and properly moving

Labyrinth poster74

Labyrinth

1986 · Henson’s puppets do with foam and latex what this does with computers