Film review

Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince

2009 · Directed by David Yates · 2h 33m · MPA PG

In a sentenceA school of wizards discovers hormones, and the end of the world politely waits its turn

AdventureFantasy

Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) is beginning his sixth year at Hogwarts as Voldemort’s followers start attacking London in daylight. Before term, Albus Dumbledore (Michael Gambon) collects him from a station café and takes him to a village to coax a retired teacher, Horace Slughorn (Jim Broadbent), back to the school. Dumbledore then sets Harry a private task: get close to Slughorn and draw out a memory he is hiding, one that concerns Voldemort’s own schooldays. Meanwhile Draco Malfoy (Tom Felton) has been given a job of his own and is not saying what. Around them, Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint) tries out for the Quidditch team and acquires an admirer in Lavender Brown (Jessie Cave), Hermione Granger (Emma Watson) is furious about it, and Harry inherits a second-hand potions textbook annotated by someone signing himself the Half-Blood Prince.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

The sixth Potter is the funniest and best-looking of the series, with Jim Broadbent and Rupert Grint carrying the middle hour. It is also the one in which least happens, and when the story finally arrives it is over in ten minutes.

The sixth Harry Potter film has a war coming and a school year to get through first, and it is far more interested in the school year. David Yates, back after Order of the Phoenix, and Steve Kloves, adapting J.K. Rowling’s novel, have made a teenage comedy of manners with a thriller bolted to the side. The comedy is the best thing the series has done. The thriller is hurried, and the thriller is what the title is about.

Bruno Delbonnel has drained the colour out of Hogwarts. Everything is green-grey and lit from windows and candles, so the castle sits in a permanent November afternoon and faces come out of the dark one at a time. It is the handsomest the series has looked and the gloomiest. Stuart Craig gives Slughorn rooms crammed with cushions and framed photographs of pupils who went on to do well, and the potions dungeon a basin of something that smells of whatever you most want. Jany Temime loosens the ties, so the uniforms hang the way they do on sixteen-year-olds, badly and on purpose.

The older cast do the heavy lifting. Jim Broadbent plays Horace Slughorn, the potions master Dumbledore lures back to teach, as a man who collects promising children the way others collect stamps, and knows there is something shabby in it. He is funny and then, in a single scene by a fire, not funny at all. Alan Rickman has a handful of lines as Snape and makes each one an event, with pauses you could park in. Tom Felton, given more to do than ever, plays Draco Malfoy as a boy handed a task too big for him who cannot tell anyone, and his scenes alone in a bathroom are the closest the film gets to dread. Michael Gambon’s Dumbledore is gentler than before, and rather good.

The children have mostly grown into actors. Rupert Grint is the surprise: his Ron, dazed by a love potion or being kissed against his will by Jessie Cave’s Lavender Brown, is a proper comic performance, all slack jaw and wounded pride. Emma Watson does her best work of the series watching him, and a scene on a staircase in which Hermione says almost nothing is played with real delicacy. We laughed a good deal in the middle hour, and nearly all of it was Grint and Broadbent. Daniel Radcliffe is steadier than he was, and gets one funny scene under a luck potion, but he is playing the one person in the building not allowed a life. Bonnie Wright’s Ginny, who is meant to be the reason he wants one, gets a few short scenes to become it.

The plot is the trouble. Dumbledore sets Harry to get close to Slughorn and draw a memory out of him, and the film forgets the job for forty minutes at a stretch. The Half-Blood Prince’s annotated potions book, which gives the film its name, is introduced with a flourish and then left in a bag. Mark Day cuts the school scenes with patience and the story scenes as if late for something, so an attack on the Weasleys’ house at Christmas arrives from nowhere, burns for three minutes and is not mentioned again. Quidditch is back, and stops the film dead. Nicholas Hooper’s score is quiet, mostly strings and a few piano figures, and rarely tells us what to feel, which is a relief until the one moment we needed telling.

That moment comes at the end, and we will not describe it. What we can say is that it is the event the film has been walking towards for two hours, staged in Delbonnel’s best light, and we sat through it dry-eyed. We noticed the camera moves, and then felt cross that the film had spent so long on snogging and Quidditch and left itself ten minutes for the thing that mattered. The cave sequence just before, lit by one wand over black water, frightened us far more.

Yates’s Order of the Phoenix (2007) was rushed and this is not. Alfonso Cuarón’s Prisoner of Azkaban (2004) is still the only one of these films that works for someone who has not read the book, and this one does not try. It runs 153 minutes and carries a 12A. Watch it for the middle hour, for Broadbent and Grint and the light, and accept that the story is being saved for the next film.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

64
Positive
10
Mixed
7
Negative
2

Most critics find this a well-made, more grown-up entry, and the praise clusters in two places. The craft departments get the warmest notices: the cinematography, production design and score are singled out repeatedly, and the Quidditch sequences are widely mentioned as highlights. The other constant is the supporting cast. Jim Broadbent’s Slughorn and Alan Rickman’s Snape are named as standouts across reviews that agree on little else, and David Yates is credited with a calmer, more human film that puts romance and character ahead of spectacle.

The split is over whether it works on its own. A large group of mixed reviews call it set-up for the finale: thin on plot, rushed at key moments and long for what it delivers. The young leads divide opinion sharply, and the spread is wide. The New York Times and The New Yorker are the harshest, seeing series fatigue and too much solemnity, while Collider, Den of Geek and The Playlist rank it above every previous entry.

The Telegraph
15 July 2009 · ★★★★ · Sukhdev Sandhu
80

The film stands head and shoulders above the previous five and is terrific entertainment in its own right, with liberated performances from the leads and a genuine emotional tug. It is confident, muscular and comic.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
4 July 2009 · Xan Brooks
70*

The film is a solidly constructed addition to the series with fine effects, though the growing-up juvenile leads expose a weakness in the franchise. Director David Yates handles the cards well despite some ungainliness.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
5 July 2009 · Kirk Honeycutt
70*

The review highlights an air of foreboding over Hogwarts as the confrontation with Voldemort looms, with romantic subplots among the students providing some relief amid the darkness. It praises the technical contributions from composer, cinematographer, and designer while noting the hurried pacing and weakened position of the protagonist in the climax.

Read the full review →
Time Out
9 July 2009 · 3 out of 5 stars · Wally Hammond
70*

The critic finds it a more human, less frenzied affair focused on romance and character moments rather than action. Praises the director’s restraint and the human details, intimacy, and performances.

Read the full review →
Variety
5 July 2009 · Todd McCarthy
70*

Todd McCarthy praises the film as dazzlingly well made and a formidable entry that shifts effectively into life-or-death drama with increased grit and maturity. He highlights David Yates’ confident direction, Steve Kloves’ screenplay, and strong production values while noting a lack of dramatic modulation.

Read the full review →
Empire
8 July 2009 · Angie Errigo
60*

The film struggles to blend impending doom with teen romance and humour in an overlong story with rushed plot points; standout spectacle from cinematography and production design is memorable, though acting is variable.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2010

Nominated
Best Cinematography

MTV Movie Award for Best Villain, 2010

Won
MTV Movie Award for Best Villain

If you liked this, try…

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban poster

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

2004 · The one entry that works on its own; Cuarón found weather in Hogwarts.

The History Boys poster

The History Boys

2006 · Another teacher who collects clever boys, and Bennett is far funnier about it.

If.... poster82

If....

1968 · Boarding school as pressure cooker, ending in what the Potter films only threaten.

Let the Right One In poster88

Let the Right One In

2008 · Adolescence and menace in a Swedish suburb, told with far fewer words.

Spirited Away poster92

Spirited Away

2001 · A child in a world of rules she must learn fast, drawn rather than rendered.