Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) holds a rifle beside Marion (Karen Allen) at the wheel with Mutt
Film review

Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

2008 · Directed by Steven Spielberg · 2h 02m · BBFC 12A

In a sentenceHarrison Ford survives an atomic bomb in a fridge, then spends ninety minutes wishing he had stayed in it

Nevada, 1957. A convoy of Soviet soldiers drives into a government warehouse with two prisoners: Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) and his old comrade George ‘Mac’ McHale (Ray Winstone). Their commander, Irina Spalko (Cate Blanchett), a Soviet scientist with a rapier and a black bob, wants a crate Jones was once made to examine, and she wants him to find it. He does, escapes, and walks straight into an atomic test. At Marshall College, Dean Charles Stanforth (Jim Broadbent) tells him the FBI has questions and the college wants him gone. Then a young man with a motorbike and a quiff, Mutt Williams (Shia LaBeouf), turns up with a letter from Professor Harold Oxley (John Hurt), who has vanished in Peru looking for a crystal skull. Jones and Mutt go after him.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Spielberg’s fourth Indiana Jones film opens with forty minutes near the old standard, then loses its way in the jungle, handing the stunts to a computer and the plot to a man who talks in riddles. Ford is worth it; the rest is not.

Nineteen years after Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989), Steven Spielberg has brought the archaeologist back, older, greyer and still wearing the hat. The idea, from a story by George Lucas and Jeff Nathanson and a screenplay by David Koepp, is a good one: move the series out of the 1930s serials it was built on and into the 1950s B-picture, with atom bombs, flying saucers, Soviets and boys on motorbikes. For its first forty minutes the film does exactly that. Then it goes to the jungle, the computer takes over, and 122 minutes later we came out fond of it and not much more.

The opening is the good part. Guy Hendrix Dyas builds a government warehouse of crates stacked to the roof, and Janusz Kamiński lights it with hard shafts of light through dust, so that it looks like the last shot of Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) seen from the other side. Then Jones runs into a town built for an atomic test, with mannequins at the dinner tables and a television on, and hides in a lead-lined fridge. We sat up. Ford standing on a ridge against the mushroom cloud, hat in hand, is the one image in the film we would keep, and when John Williams brought the march in over it we forgave a good deal in advance.

Ford plays the age rather than hiding it. Koepp’s script keeps mentioning that Jones is not the man he was, and Ford agrees with it, moving stiffly, grumbling, and then doing the whip business with the old timing when it counts. Cate Blanchett’s Irina Spalko, a Soviet scientist who claims to read minds, arrives with a rapier, a black bob, a fitted grey uniform from Mary Zophres and an accent from a sillier film, and she is the best of the supporting cast because she alone seems to know exactly what kind of film this is. Shia LaBeouf’s Mutt Williams, all comb and black leather, is better than his reputation; what he is asked to do with vines and monkeys is not his fault. Karen Allen comes back as Marion Ravenwood, and her rowing with Ford across the front seat of a moving vehicle is the warmest thing in the film after the fridge.

The rest of the cast is doing the plot’s job for it. John Hurt’s Professor Oxley spends an hour talking in riddles, and the riddles are what the film has instead of a story; whenever someone needs to know where to go next, Oxley says something about a skull and off they drive. Ray Winstone’s Mac changes sides so often we stopped keeping score. Jim Broadbent has one good scene as the dean who breaks the bad news and is then gone.

The jungle is where the film loses its nerve. The long truck chase through the trees, with Blanchett and LaBeouf fencing across two vehicles, is cut cleanly by Michael Kahn and would be a proper set piece if the frame were not filling up with things that were never there: ants the size of terriers, three waterfalls in a row, a troop of monkeys who swing alongside Mutt as if he were one of them. The monkeys made us groan out loud. By the ants we were no longer worried for anyone, and worry is the whole trade of this series. Kamiński’s hazy, diffused light, so handsome in the warehouse, flattens the jungle into a painted backdrop, and the practical falls and crashes the earlier films were built on are mostly absent.

The second half turns towards the skull and a temple, and we will not describe where it ends up, except to say that Lucas’s story credit shows and that the last ten minutes are softer than the series has ever allowed itself. Most critics have been a little kinder than we are, and we understand why: the film is hard to dislike, the cast is enjoying itself, and the first act is close to the real thing. But Raiders of the Lost Ark frightened us and Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom (1984) frightened children, and this frightened nobody, which is a strange thing for an adventure film to have settled for.

See it for the warehouse, the fridge and Blanchett, and see it with someone under twelve, who will not mind the monkeys. It runs 122 minutes and carries a 12A, and the certificate is about right: nothing in it will keep anyone up.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

60
Positive
8
Mixed
4
Negative
4

Most critics find it an acceptable return rather than a great one: eight of sixteen come down positive, and the praise clusters in the same places. Ford’s weary charm carries it, LaBeouf is a welcome sidekick, and Cate Blanchett’s villain is singled out more often than any set piece. Several reviews admire the opening stretch, with the early chase and the fridge scene mentioned as Spielberg at his most confident, and the practical stunt work is generally preferred to what follows.

The reservations gather in the second half. Once the story reaches the jungle, critics complain of convoluted plotting, heavier computer effects and a supernatural finale that even friendly reviews call hokum. The spread is wide: Den of Geek calls it a triumph, while The Guardian finds the revival pointless and The Hollywood Reporter a wearying onslaught that swamps story and character. A few also note the Russian villains never frighten the way the Nazis did.

Radio Times
★★★★ · Andrew Collins
80

The film delivers exhausting but enjoyable Saturday matinée thrills with chases, giant ants, secret passageways and aliens. It is hard to dislike thanks to Ford's weary charm, LaBeouf as the new sidekick and an emphasis on old-school stuntwork.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
18 May 2008
75*

The old magic still works in this fond reunion with an old friend that will not disappoint fans or new audiences as a summer blockbuster. It improves greatly once the treasure hunt and action sequences begin, with strong performances from Ford, LaBeouf and Allen balancing the spectacle.

Read the full review →
Empire
19 May 2008 · Damon Wise
70*

The critic calls it a minor triumph plucked from the jaws of disappointment, a real Indy movie that preserves the character's intelligence, urbanity and kick-arse cool while delivering slick fun action beats.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
19 May 2008 · festival review · Kenneth Turan
70*

The film avoids anticlimax and is entertaining in its own right thanks to Spielberg's skilled handling of stunts and effects, making it one of the better entries in the series even if not as iconic as Raiders. Supporting players like Blanchett shine amid solid action set pieces.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
22 May 2008 · B- · Scott Tobias
70

The review notes that while Spielberg orchestrates robust silliness with visual panache, the film fails to stick the landing after a strong start. The fun dissipates into noisy supernatural hokum as the story becomes overstuffed and labored.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
22 May 2008 · festival review · Manohla Dargis
70*

The film is a boomer-friendly reunion adventure that keeps the mood light and PG-13 friendly while delivering familiar thrills with Harrison Ford returning as Indy. It serves up reunion energy but notes some softening in the series' edge compared to earlier entries.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull worth watching?
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is worth watching for anyone fond of Harrison Ford and the series, but only just, and we scored it 55. The first forty minutes, with the warehouse and the atomic test, are close to the old standard; the jungle half hands the stunts to a computer. See it for Ford, Cate Blanchett and the fridge.
How long is Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, and what is it rated?
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull runs 2h 02m and is rated 12A by the BBFC in the UK. It is an adventure and action film.
Where can I watch Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull in the UK?
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is streaming on Amazon Prime Video in the UK, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from £2.49. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, and is it suitable for children?
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull carries a 12A and is the least frightening film in the series; nothing in it will keep anyone up. There is an atomic blast, a sword fight across two moving trucks and a swarm of oversized ants, all done with computer effects rather than practical falls. We would happily take a child under twelve, who will also not mind the monkeys.
How does Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull compare to Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade?
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is the weaker of the two, and Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade is the one to return to. The earlier film has Sean Connery and a father-and-son quarrel that gives it life; the later one has a promising 1950s setting and a strong first act, then loses its nerve in a jungle of digital animals. Choose the 2008 film only for Ford playing his age.
Do you need to have seen the other Indiana Jones films before Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull?
Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull can be watched without the earlier films, since Mutt Williams is new and the plot is explained, at length, by John Hurt in riddles. Newcomers will miss the pleasure of Karen Allen returning as Marion Ravenwood and of Ford playing an older Jones. It is not the best place to start; the earlier films are stronger and this one leans on them.
What should I watch after Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull?
After Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, try Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981, Fi1m 93): The original: one boulder, one truck, one man, and every stunt done for real. Then Kiss Me Deadly (1955, Fi1m 87): The 1950s paranoia this film is imitating, with a glowing box and no monkeys; and Romancing the Stone (1984, Fi1m 77): Jungle, treasure and a bickering couple, played for laughs and better at them.
What order should I watch the Indiana Jones films in?
Release order is the safe choice for Indiana Jones, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is number 4 of the 5 Indiana Jones titles on Fi1m; before it comes Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade and after it Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny. The full order.

Part of · 4 of 5

Indiana Jones

5 films on Fi1m · 1981–2023 · average 71 · best Raiders of the Lost Ark 93

All 5 in order

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981, Fi1m 93)The original: one boulder, one truck, one man, and every stunt done for real.

  2. Kiss Me Deadly (1955, Fi1m 87)The 1950s paranoia this film is imitating, with a glowing box and no monkeys.

  3. Romancing the Stone (1984, Fi1m 77)Jungle, treasure and a bickering couple, played for laughs and better at them.

  4. Aguirre, the Wrath of God (1972, Fi1m 91)A hunt for a lost city where the river and the madness are entirely real.

  5. The Adventures of Tintin (2011, Fi1m 77)Spielberg doing the chase-and-treasure film in animation, where the computer belongs.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever