Joker (Heath Ledger) facing Batman (Christian Bale) across an interrogation table
Film review

The Dark Knight

2008 · Directed by Christopher Nolan · 2h 32m

In a sentenceBatman has all the equipment and still looks underprepared

In Gotham, Batman confronts the Joker (Heath Ledger), whose lack of conscience makes him a dangerous opponent. Christian Bale plays Bruce Wayne, alongside Aaron Eckhart as Harvey Dent and Gary Oldman as Gordon. The conflict puts questions of violence, responsibility and moral compromise inside a crime story, as Batman faces an enemy with little interest in ordinary limits. Maggie Gyllenhaal plays Rachel, Michael Caine plays Alfred and Morgan Freeman plays Lucius Fox. Christopher Nolan directs and co-writes the screenplay with Jonathan Nolan.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Christopher Nolan makes a gripping crime thriller, with Heath Ledger’s Joker giving its moral dilemmas a frightening urgency. The speeches can labour the point, but the suspense and performances justify the long evening.

Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight is a gripping crime thriller that occasionally stops to tell us how serious it is. We recommend it for its suspense and the force of its performances. Nolan takes the responsibilities of a hero seriously enough to make them troublesome, then gives the villain the intelligence to exploit that trouble. The action matters because the people involved have something to lose besides the fight.

Heath Ledger’s Joker is the chief reason it works. We were frightened by him. Ledger makes the character’s lack of conscience feel casual, so that cruelty seems to require no more effort than conversation. There is enough intelligence in the performance to make the violence feel deliberate, without the reassuring sense that an intelligent opponent might eventually be reasonable. He earns the attention he takes from the rest of the cast, and the film becomes harder to predict whenever he appears.

Christian Bale’s Bruce Wayne gives the film a necessary centre, and his intensity helps him hold his place opposite Ledger. Aaron Eckhart’s Harvey Dent has a conviction that feels distinct from Bale’s, helping to make the moral questions a disagreement between people we can believe in. Gary Oldman’s Gordon adds a welcome measure of restraint to a film in which seriousness can become a competitive activity. Maggie Gyllenhaal, as Rachel, has less room to work, and the writing does not give her an equally persuasive voice in those disagreements.

Wally Pfister’s cinematography gives the action weight, making the danger feel close even when the film is working on a large scale. Nathan Crowley’s production design helps the crime story feel credible; the setting seems capable of supporting a thriller without Batman in it. That solidity matters when the gadgetry begins to demand more attention than it deserves. The equipment can be a distraction, but it rarely overwhelms the people who have to use it.

Lee Smith’s editing keeps the action urgent without making the whole film feel like a single prolonged chase. The music by Hans Zimmer and James Newton Howard adds pressure effectively, although its insistence sometimes leaves too little room for a quieter response. Across 152 minutes, the pace does falter, and the pauses are not always where we would choose to take a breath. Even so, Nolan repeatedly gets the suspense going again, helped by characters whose decisions remain worth following.

The larger weakness is the screenplay, by Christopher Nolan and Jonathan Nolan, which too often explains a choice that the performances have already made clear. Characters can sound as though they are making sure we have followed the discussion. We admire the attempt to give a comic-book thriller difficult questions about violence and responsibility, but the answers need not all be spoken aloud. The actors have already done enough to let us make up our minds.

As a comic-book thriller, it makes an unusually strong case for taking the people beneath the costumes seriously. We would choose it for an evening of sustained tension, not for easy reassurance. Watch it in one sitting, so the suspense has a chance to build without having to compete with tomorrow’s errands.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

90
Positive
11
Mixed
0
Negative
0

The consensus is strongly positive, with praise clustering around Heath Ledger’s Joker, Christopher Nolan’s direction and the film’s moral complexity. Most critics see a substantial crime thriller that takes its characters and their choices seriously. Ledger is the clearest point of agreement: the reviews repeatedly describe a frightening, psychologically complex performance that dominates the film. The action also earns praise for its force and scale.

The differences concern how well the ideas survive the spectacle. Time Out finds the action threatens to drown them out, while The Hollywood Reporter praises the clarity of the ideas and characters. The Guardian admires the storytelling but questions the heavy moral weight placed on a blockbuster. Reservations elsewhere concern pacing, gadgetry and occasional lulls. The spread runs from enthusiastic approval to qualified admiration rather than outright dissent; even the more cautious reviews remain persuaded by Ledger.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Jeremy Aspinall
100

Calls it an awesome, landmark comic-book adaptation with ambition; praises Ledger's iconic Joker and the action sequences.

Read the full review →
RogerEbert.com
16 July 2008 · ★★★★/4 · Roger Ebert
100

The film is a haunted tragedy that redefines the comic-book movie with complex moral dilemmas and characters audiences care about. It singles out Heath Ledger's psychologically complex, revenge-driven Joker for particular praise.

Read the full review →
Slant Magazine
17 July 2008 · ★★★★/4
100

The critic hails the film as very close to a pop masterpiece and a noir-ish DC Comics action-adventure reconfigured as a discerning, ambiguous rumination on terrorism-besieged times. It singles out Heath Ledger's transfixing, indelible portrait of the Joker for praise.

Read the full review →
The New York Times
18 July 2008 · Manohla Dargis
90*

Nolan's film goes darker and deeper than prior comic-book movies by embracing ambivalence that might be mistaken for pessimism. It singles out Heath Ledger's visceral, alive Joker performance as a standout that pulls viewers in.

Read the full review →
Variety
6 July 2008 · Justin Chang
85*

This is an ambitious, full-bodied crime epic of gratifying scope and moral complexity, seriously brainy pop entertainment. It singles out Heath Ledger's indelible, frightening immersion as the maniacally murderous Joker.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
17 July 2008 · Kenneth Turan
80*

The sequel is the most hopeless, despairing comic-book movie in memory, meditating on darker themes with implications for the present. It singles out Heath Ledger's transfixing, bone-chilling performance as the nihilistic Joker.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Dark Knight worth watching?
The Dark Knight is worth watching for anyone who wants a serious, sustained crime thriller with a frightening villain, and we scored it 85. Heath Ledger's Joker and the tension Christopher Nolan builds around him carry the long evening. The screenplay explains its moral questions more than it needs to, and the pace falters across 152 minutes, but the suspense keeps recovering.
How long is The Dark Knight, and what is it rated?
The Dark Knight runs 2h 32m. It is an action and thriller film.
Where can I watch The Dark Knight in Chile?
The Dark Knight is streaming on HBO Max and Amazon Prime Video in Chile, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from CLF 990.00. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How does The Dark Knight compare to Batman Begins?
The Dark Knight is the better film of the two, tighter in its suspense and lifted by a villain the earlier picture does not have. Batman Begins is the origin story, giving Bruce Wayne enough weight to make Batman convincing, though its fights can be hard to follow. Choose the earlier film for the character's foundations and the later one for a crime thriller with real tension.
Do you need to have seen the other Batman films before The Dark Knight?
The Dark Knight can be followed without seeing the other Batman films, because its conflict between Batman and the Joker is set out on its own terms as a crime story. It follows Batman Begins, which introduces Bruce Wayne, Alfred, Gordon and Lucius Fox, so watching that first adds context but is not required. It is a reasonable place for a newcomer to start.
What should I watch after The Dark Knight?
After The Dark Knight, try Heat (1995, Fi1m 91): Another crime film that gives its pursuers and criminals equal weight. Then The Third Man (1949, Fi1m 92): A compromised city, a persuasive villain and uncomfortable choices about loyalty; and Infernal Affairs (2002, Fi1m 87): Police work becomes exhausting when nobody can safely admit who they are.
What order should I watch the Batman films in?
Release order is the safe choice for Batman, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. The Dark Knight is number 6 of the 7 Batman titles on Fi1m; before it comes Batman Begins and after it The Dark Knight Rises. The full order.

Part of · 6 of 7

Batman

7 films on Fi1m · 1989–2012 · average 70 · best The Dark Knight 85

All 7 in order

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2009

Nominated
Best Cinematography
Nominated
Best Film Editing
Nominated
Best Makeup and Hairstyling
Nominated
Best Production Design
Nominated
Best Sound
Nominated
Best Visual Effects
Won
Best Sound Editing
Won
Best Supporting Actor

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 2009

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

MTV Movie Award for Best Villain, 2009

Won
MTV Movie Award for Best Villain

If you liked this, try…

  1. Heat (1995, Fi1m 91)Another crime film that gives its pursuers and criminals equal weight.

  2. The Third Man (1949, Fi1m 92)A compromised city, a persuasive villain and uncomfortable choices about loyalty.

  3. Infernal Affairs (2002, Fi1m 87)Police work becomes exhausting when nobody can safely admit who they are.

  4. High and Low (1963, Fi1m 90)A crime thriller that makes moral responsibility a practical, painful problem.

  5. Unbreakable (2000, Fi1m 81)A quieter examination of heroism, with room for hesitation and doubt.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever