Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) aiming his wand with Hermione and Ron nearby
Film review

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2

2011 · Directed by David Yates · 2h 10m · CNC 12

In a sentenceHogwarts is under siege, and we still wish our parents had sent us there

Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe), Hermione Granger (Emma Watson) and Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint) face Lord Voldemort (Ralph Fiennes) as their story reaches its final confrontation. An early raid on Gringotts bank forms part of the action, while Hogwarts becomes the centre of a battle involving characters from across the series. Alan Rickman plays Severus Snape, with Matthew Lewis as Neville Longbottom and Helena Bonham Carter as Bellatrix Lestrange. This concluding chapter of the fantasy series continues directly from Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, with David Yates directing.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

David Yates brings Harry Potter’s story to a forceful, moving close, with actors who hold their own amid the fighting. Some farewells are hurried, and newcomers should start elsewhere, but this is a satisfying finish.

David Yates gives Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 a satisfying, often moving sense of completion. It is also a demanding place to begin, and we would not recommend treating it as an introduction. Steve Kloves’s screenplay assumes that the names, loyalties and unfinished business already mean something. That lets Yates get on with the fighting, but it also means the film borrows much of its emotional force from earlier instalments. For those who have followed them, that seems a reasonable bargain.

The raid on Gringotts bank gives the action an early purpose and an immediate sense of danger. Yates handles a crowded sequence without making activity feel like an achievement in itself. Editor Mark Day keeps the film moving briskly, while allowing its quieter exchanges enough space to register. At 130 minutes, it has considerable business to get through, and for much of the running time the urgency feels earned.

We were surprised by how much it hurt to see Hogwarts turned into a battlefield. Stuart Craig’s production design makes the school feel substantial enough for its fate to matter, even amid such extravagant fantasy. Eduardo Serra’s sombre cinematography gives the fighting a grimness that prevents it from becoming merely a display of spells. The look can be oppressive, but a brighter, more inviting battle would have been a strange choice for this story.

Daniel Radcliffe is a persuasive centre for all this, carrying Harry’s responsibilities without constantly asking us to admire the effort. Emma Watson and Rupert Grint give Hermione and Ron enough warmth to keep the central trio from becoming solemn company. The performances make room for apprehension as well as resolve, which is important in a film with so much combat. Yates is sensible enough to keep returning to the actors when the scale threatens to become exhausting.

Alan Rickman makes Severus Snape compelling without seeming to compete for our attention. There is weight to his presence even when the surrounding film seems in a hurry. Ralph Fiennes gives Voldemort a nastiness that keeps the threat personal, and Matthew Lewis brings welcome spirit to Neville Longbottom. The supporting cast make a strong impression in limited space, although the sheer number of familiar faces occasionally leaves a scene feeling like an allotted appearance.

Alexandre Desplat’s score supports the seriousness of the drama, and its emotional insistence mostly feels justified. The music cannot always compensate for the speed at which the film passes over its human consequences. Kloves and Yates have so much to settle that some moments need longer than they receive. Day’s briskness becomes less helpful when we want to remain with a character. It is a real limitation, though it does not undo the feeling the actors have earned.

The standard fantasy finale can feel obliged to make every confrontation bigger than the last. Yates largely avoids that fatigue by giving the actors room within the spectacle, even if he sometimes moves on too soon. We would not use this film to test whether wizards are our sort of thing. If the preceding chapter is hazy, revisit it before starting this one.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

82
Positive
15
Mixed
3
Negative
0

Most critics find Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 a satisfying farewell, with action and emotional weight given room to work together. Praise centres on David Yates’s handling of large-scale battles alongside quieter character moments, and on an ensemble that makes limited screen time count. Alan Rickman draws particular attention, while Daniel Radcliffe earns strong notices for carrying the story’s heavier demands.

The reservations concern how well the film stands alone and whether its closing passages deliver the expected feeling. Variety admires the urgency but finds the climax hurried and emotionally muted; HeyUGuys argues that the abrupt opening and insufficient buildup make it work better alongside Part 1. Den of Geek also questions Radcliffe’s handling of the dramatic weight, bucking the broader praise. The spread is predominantly positive rather than sharply divided, with even the mixed reviews finding worthwhile performances or sequences.

Radio Times
★★★★★ · Alan Jones
100

The fantasy franchise comes to a hugely satisfying and teary-eyed conclusion as Harry and Voldemort clash for the last time. Every beloved character gets their moment, with the Snape backstory and revelation about Harry's destiny packing an emotional wallop.

Read the full review →
Time Out
11 July 2011 · ★★★★★ · Joshua Rothkopf
100

The final film supplies Daniel Radcliffe with gravitas from an epic story's completion and real dramatic heft. Stewarded by director David Yates, this fleet, triumphant sequel puts people first.

Read the full review →
Empire
12 November 2010 · Helen O'Hara
85*

The final film is a worthy farewell that packs in spectacular action and emotional beats without stinting on either. It excels in human moments, particularly the revelations around Snape, and gives Daniel Radcliffe his strongest showcase as Harry faces his destiny.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
8 July 2011
85*

Bowing out in 3D, the film is a magnificently entertaining movie brimming with energy and excitement, allowing screen time for the cast to bid farewell. Part 2 is all about thrills, spills and action in the final showdown with Voldemort.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
6 July 2011 · Todd McCarthy
85*

The film provides a satisfying and exciting conclusion to the franchise, fully justifying the split of the final book. Yates orchestrates the massive events with impressive finesse and dramatic composition.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
14 July 2011 · B+ · Tasha Robinson
83

The shortest entry delivers epic scope and final payoffs after dispensing with side quests. It mines the book for excitement and pathos with grand dramatic moments and strong supporting performances.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 worth watching?
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is worth watching for anyone who has followed the series, and we scored it 83. David Yates brings the story to a forceful, moving close, and Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint hold their own amid the fighting. Some farewells are hurried, and the film leans on earlier instalments for much of its emotional weight.
How long is Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2, and what is it rated?
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 runs 2h 10m and is rated 12 by the CNC in France. It is an adventure and fantasy film.
Where can I watch Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 in France?
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is streaming on HBO Max and Amazon Prime Video in France, and it is also available to rent from Amazon Prime Video and Apple TV from €2.99. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2, and is it suitable for children?
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is a 12A, and it is the grimmest film in the series, with Hogwarts turned into a battlefield and a sombre, oppressive look throughout. The fighting is sustained and the threat from Voldemort is personal and nasty. Older children who know the earlier films should cope; younger or more sensitive ones may find the darkness and the losses hard going.
Is Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 based on a true story or a book?
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is based on a book, not a true story: it adapts the second half of J.K. Rowling's novel Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows. Steve Kloves's screenplay assumes you already know the names, loyalties and unfinished business, so readers of the book will find it easier to follow. We cannot say how closely it tracks the novel's details.
Do you need to have seen the other Harry Potter films before Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2?
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is the concluding chapter of the Harry Potter series and does not stand alone. It continues directly from Part 1 and borrows much of its emotional force from earlier films, so newcomers should start elsewhere. If the previous film is hazy, we would revisit it before starting this one.
What should I watch after Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2?
After Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2, try The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003, Fi1m 88): Another long farewell that earns its battles through people we have come to know. Then Princess Mononoke (1997, Fi1m 88): For fantasy battles where the damage matters as much as victory; and The Dark Crystal (1982, Fi1m 78): A perilous quest through a handmade fantasy landscape that never feels safe.
What order should I watch the Harry Potter films in?
Release order is the safe choice for Harry Potter, and it is the order our collection page lists them in. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 is number 8 of the 11 Harry Potter titles on Fi1m; before it comes Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 and after it Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them. The full order.

Part of · 8 of 11

Harry Potter

11 films on Fi1m · 2001–2022 · average 66 · best Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 83

All 11 in order

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2012

Nominated
Best Makeup and Hairstyling
Nominated
Best Production Design
Nominated
Best Visual Effects

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie, 2012

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite Movie

BAFTA Film Awards, 2011

Won
BAFTA's Children & Young People Award - Feature Film

If you liked this, try…

  1. The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003, Fi1m 88)Another long farewell that earns its battles through people we have come to know.

  2. Princess Mononoke (1997, Fi1m 88)For fantasy battles where the damage matters as much as victory.

  3. The Dark Crystal (1982, Fi1m 78)A perilous quest through a handmade fantasy landscape that never feels safe.

  4. The Devil's Backbone (2001) · not reviewed yetAnother endangered school, though this ghost story is for older viewers.

  5. His Dark Materials (2019) · not reviewed yetYoung companions confront formidable authority, with room for doubt alongside the magic.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever