Film review

War for the Planet of the Apes

2017 · Directed by Matt Reeves · 2h 20m · MPA PG-13

In a sentenceA war film in which the side with fur has the better manners and the better close-ups

DramaScience FictionWar

Years after a virus has thinned humanity and left apes able to speak, Caesar (Andy Serkis) leads his colony in the forests of northern California, hoping only to be left alone. He is not. A unit of human soldiers under a man known as the Colonel (Woody Harrelson) hunts the apes with the help of gorilla turncoats, among them Red Donkey (Ty Olsson). When the Colonel comes to the apes’ hideout at night and kills Caesar’s wife Cornelia (Judy Greer), Caesar sends his people towards a desert refuge and rides after the Colonel with the orangutan Maurice (Karin Konoval), the chimpanzee Rocket (Terry Notary) and the gorilla Luca (Michael Adamthwaite). On the road they pick up a mute human girl, Nova (Amiah Miller), and a nervous zoo escapee who calls himself Bad Ape (Steve Zahn).

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Matt Reeves closes the trilogy with a slow, snowbound revenge story and the best-acted ape ever put on screen. It is handsome, serious and half an hour too long, and its humans are far less carefully drawn than its chimpanzees.

Matt Reeves’s third and last film about Caesar begins with a battle in the woods and then spends most of its 140 minutes refusing to give us another one. Soldiers with slogans painted on their helmets creep through ferns towards an ape position; arrows and gunfire follow; and when it is over Caesar (Andy Serkis) sends the survivors home alive with a message for their commander. That is the whole film in one scene: the apes have learned mercy and the humans have forgotten it. Reeves and his co-writer Mark Bomback then build a revenge western on top of a war film, with a prison-camp story waiting in the second half, and they mostly hold it together.

Serkis is the reason it works as often as it does. Caesar is older, greyer and angrier than before, and the effects have reached a point where we stopped thinking about the technique within minutes and simply watched an actor. His face does most of the talking. The apes sign more than they speak, and the film has the patience to let a subtitle sit under a stare. Karin Konoval’s Maurice, the orangutan who has been Caesar’s conscience since Rise, gets the quietest scenes, most of them with Amiah Miller’s silent girl, and Toby Kebbell’s Koba, Caesar’s enemy from Dawn, turns up in a way the film does not explain and does not need to.

Michael Seresin shoots the first hour in wet green and the second in snow, and the switch does what the story needs: the world empties out around Caesar as he rides north. The night raid on the apes’ hideout is lit by hand torches and little else, and we were more shaken by it than we expected to be, because Reeves keeps the camera on Caesar’s face rather than on what he has found. James Chinlund’s production design gives the Colonel a camp in the mountains built into an old army depot, and it is the most convincing place in the film. Michael Giacchino’s score leans on drums and low woodwind and there is a great deal of it; when the film goes quiet, which is often, we wished it went quieter. William Hoy and Stan Salfas cut the opening assault so that we always know which side of the ridge we are on, and cut the long middle at a pace some will call patient and we, around the ninety-minute mark, called slow.

Woody Harrelson’s Colonel is the problem, or rather the writing around him is. He shaves his head, wears aviator sunglasses and has decided that the end of humanity justifies anything. Melissa Bruning’s costumes put him in a scarf and a leather jacket that owe an obvious debt to Apocalypse Now, and the film knows it, which does not make the debt smaller. He gets one long speech across a table explaining himself, and Harrelson delivers it well, but it is a speech, and the apes have spent an hour making the same points with their eyebrows. The other humans are given rifles and little else. Gabriel Chavarria’s Preacher, a young soldier Caesar spares early on, is set up to matter more than the film lets him.

Steve Zahn’s Bad Ape, a zoo chimpanzee who has survived alone in a ski lodge and speaks in nervous half-sentences, is the one concession to lightness. We laughed at him, and then wondered whether a film this grim should be reaching for a laugh quite so often. He is also the one performance where we could see the actor behind the ape, which after Serkis is a step down.

Set beside Rise (2011) and Reeves’s own Dawn (2014), this is the best-looking of the three. It is also the slowest. Dawn had a villain who wanted something we understood; the Colonel wants a wall. At 140 minutes the film is around half an hour longer than its story, though the last twenty minutes justify more of the wait than we expected.

It carries a 12A certificate, and it is a hard one: apes are whipped, shot and starved, and a child who loved the earlier films could reasonably come out having enjoyed none of this. Grown-ups who liked the first two will find plenty to admire and a fair amount to sit through. Take the biggest screen available and do not expect the war the title promises.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

76
Positive
20
Mixed
3
Negative
4
The i Paper
13 July 2017 · ★★★★★ · Matthew Turner
100

The review praises the film as a thoroughly enjoyable conclusion to the trilogy that makes viewers root for the apes' cause through technical wizardry, emotional close-ups, and a subversive script. It singles out the remarkable motion-capture performances and the way sympathy is built for the ape characters despite the story's apocalyptic implications for humanity.

Read the full review →
Evening Standard
16 November 2017 · Matthew Norman
90*

The critic calls the film an instant classic and masterly piece of work, a riveting blockbuster filled with heart and soul that idealises apes while demonising humanity. They single out the superlative cinematography, riveting plot, and emotional depth of the ape characters, especially Caesar's internal battle.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
26 June 2017 · Eric Kohn
90*

The critic calls it a masterful conclusion to the best sci-fi trilogy since the original Star Wars, noting that as big effects-driven spectacles go, you can't do much better. It highlights the film's success as a Hollywood blockbuster.

Read the full review →
Los Angeles Times
12 July 2017 · Justin Chang
90*

The critic hails it as a work of stunning blockbuster artistry with breathtaking formal beauty and tonal control, praising the visual storytelling, expressive ape performances, and moral nuance in rooting for the apes.

Read the full review →
Screen Daily
26 June 2017
90*

Reeves delivers a clever, well-acted summer blockbuster that serves as a smart and noble conclusion to the trilogy. It blends Western revenge and war movie elements effectively with strong performances.

Read the full review →
Sight and Sound
13 July 2017 · Kim Newman
90*

The film is a rich and satisfying entry that completes the recent Apes trilogy with epic scope. It stands out for its leaps in motion-capture technology and strong performances, especially Andy Serkis as Caesar.

Read the full review →

Cast

Awards

Academy Awards, 2018

Nominated
Best Visual Effects

If you liked this, try…