Chandler (Matthew Perry), Rachel (Jennifer Aniston), Joey (Matt LeBlanc), Monica (Courteney Cox), Ross (David Schwimmer) and Phoebe (Lisa Kudrow) sip milkshakes
Series review

Friends

1994 · Created by Marta Kauffman, David Crane · Series · RTC AA

In a sentenceSix friends make interrupting one another look like a workable arrangement for adult life

In Manhattan, Rachel Green (Jennifer Aniston), Monica Geller (Courteney Cox) and Phoebe Buffay (Lisa Kudrow) form a circle with Joey Tribbiani (Matt LeBlanc), Chandler Bing (Matthew Perry) and Ross Geller (David Schwimmer). These six young adults are trying to manage their own lives while remaining closely involved in one another’s. Personal worries become group conversations, with each friend supplying advice, sympathy or another complication. The comedy stays close to this shared company, following people for whom friendship means having an audience for the business of becoming an adult.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Friends earns its warmth through six sharply matched performances, with Jennifer Aniston particularly good at making embarrassment funny. The writing strains and the social circle can feel airless, but we still recommend an evening in their company.

Friends is good company, though we would not ask it for a broad account of adult life. Created by Marta Kauffman and David Crane, it makes the closeness of its central group the main attraction, and the six performances give that closeness enough friction to keep it funny. The writing can be laboured, and the programme’s interest in the world beyond these people is limited. We recommend it for the cast, with the warning that affection sometimes has to do work the jokes should have done.

Jennifer Aniston is particularly good at making Rachel Green’s wish to seem composed interfere with her ability to speak naturally. We laughed at her awkward pauses and then felt for her, because she lets the effort of recovering her dignity show. Courteney Cox gives Monica Geller a firmer rhythm, making a useful contrast without seeming to belong to a different programme. Their performances are persuasive because both leave space for irritation inside the affection.

Matthew Perry makes Chandler Bing’s quickness feel slightly defensive; he can get a laugh simply by putting unexpected pressure on a word. David Schwimmer gives Ross Geller’s discomfort a physical weight that can make a routine exchange funnier than its wording warrants. Matt LeBlanc, as Joey Tribbiani, provides an effective contrast to both, while Lisa Kudrow’s Phoebe Buffay refuses to settle into quite the same rhythm as anybody else. We believe these people enjoy one another’s company, even when the writing is busy demonstrating their differences.

The visual approach is plainer. The cinematography, by contributors including Ken Lamkin and Nick McLean, leaves faces easy to read without giving us much else to study. Debra McGuire’s costume design gives the group a little more individuality than the lighting does. Editors including Jay Scherberth and Stephen Prime give reactions room to register, though the emphasis on some punchlines makes the exchanges feel rehearsed.

The larger reservation is how readily familiarity becomes an excuse. The programme can treat its own small social circle as sufficient explanation for everybody’s behaviour, and some of the dated material asks us to laugh along with assumptions it has scarcely examined. Warmth helps, but it cannot make a forced joke sound spontaneous. The performances occasionally seem to be working around the writing, and the effort is more noticeable because the cast can usually make conversation feel so easy.

Most critics are less persuaded than we are: the reviews question the writing and the group’s insulation from ordinary life. We share those objections, but think they give too little weight to how much the actors achieve together. For an ensemble sitcom, making us care who is listening can matter as much as giving somebody a clever line. Friends repeatedly earns that interest, which is why a merely adequate exchange can still be enjoyable.

There are ten series here, so a fondness for these performances matters more than an appetite for a particular plot. Start with the opening episodes rather than treating the whole run as an obligation. If the company does not appeal, repetition is unlikely to improve the evening.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

71
Positive
5
Mixed
2
Negative
0

Most critics like Friends, and the praise settles on the ensemble. The leads are credited with an easy chemistry that carries the writing through its thinner patches, and the sharper reviews argue the series is at its best when it stays close to its subject: twentysomethings in dead-end jobs, dating badly and growing up slowly. Several critics writing years after the fact find it has worn well, and one or two argue it was more forward-looking on women and gay parents than its reputation now allows.

The reservations divide by era. The two reviews of the 1994 pilot are the coolest, Variety in particular finding the cast livelier than the scripts and asking for funnier writing. The later dissent comes from /Film, which finds the show comforting but insular and dated, sealed off from anything happening outside its apartments. Even admirers concede a soap-opera drift in the later seasons. The spread is moderate, and nobody dislikes it.

Empire
27 May 2004 · William Thomas
90*

The critic bids farewell to the series upon its conclusion, calling it one of the greatest and most influential American sitcoms for its consistent humor, sharp writing, fine acting, and focus on friendship and empathy among the characters. They note its glossy, mainstream appeal and enduring catchphrases while acknowledging some dips in quality and soap-opera elements in later seasons.

Read the full review →
The Guardian
8 January 2014
80*

The critic finds Friends the best-ever show about twentysomethings, praising its realistic depiction of dead-end jobs, dating struggles, and quarter-life crises. It singles out the show's universal appeal and character growth through career and relationship ups and downs.

Read the full review →
The Times
7 September 2014 · Benji Wilson
75*

The critic highlights Friends' enduring popularity 20 years on, praising its durability across generations and the cast's collective pay negotiations that influenced the industry. It notes the show's massive syndication success.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
22 September 1994 · Miles Beller
70*

The critic praises the sustaining humor and capable handling of the ensemble comedy about young adults in Manhattan, noting it makes the characters' lives humorously involving despite some forced shtick.

Read the full review →
The Telegraph
28 May 2021
70*

The critic argues Friends was ahead of its time in 1994 on feminism and gay issues, praising its groundbreaking female friendships and early portrayal of a lesbian couple raising a child. It defends the show against modern retrospective criticism.

Read the full review →
Variety
22 September 1994 · Tony Scott
50*

The critic finds the pilot promising due to its ideal scheduling slot and spirited ensemble acting but notes that funnier writing will be needed for long-term success.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Friends worth watching?
Friends is worth watching for anyone who enjoys an ensemble comedy carried by its cast, and we scored it 78. The six performances make the group's closeness funny, with Jennifer Aniston particularly good at turning embarrassment into laughs. The writing can be laboured and the social circle airless, so a fondness for the company matters more than any particular plot.
How long is Friends, and what is it rated?
Friends is rated AA by the RTC in Mexico. It is a comedy series.
Where can I watch Friends in Mexico?
Friends is streaming on HBO Max and Netflix in Mexico. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Friends, and is it suitable for children?
Friends is not violent or frightening; it is a comedy about six adults managing their lives and one another's. It carries a UK 15 certificate and a US TV-PG rating, which points to adult conversation and relationship humour rather than anything alarming. Some of the dated material rests on assumptions the programme has not examined, which parents may want to bear in mind for younger teenagers.
How does Friends compare to Cheers?
Friends is the warmer of the two, while Cheers is the sharper. Both are ensemble comedies about familiar company, but Cheers makes its arguments and bruised egos the attraction, and Friends leans on affection between its six leads. Viewers who prefer a good insult will find Cheers the tighter watch; those who want to like the people they spend time with should choose Friends.
What should I watch after Friends?
After Friends, try Cheers (1982, Fi1m 88): Another ensemble whose sharp exchanges make familiar company worth returning to. Then The Mary Tyler Moore Show (1970, Fi1m 88): For character comedy that allows affection and professional frustration equal space; and Spaced (1999, Fi1m 86): A smaller circle of friends, with scruffier surroundings and more visual invention.

Cast

Awards

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite TV Actress, 2004

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite TV Actress

Kids' Choice Award for Favorite TV Show, 2004

Nominated
Kids' Choice Award for Favorite TV Show

Primetime Emmy Awards, 2004

Nominated
Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy Series

TCA Heritage Award, 2004

Nominated
TCA Heritage Award

Primetime Emmy Awards, 2003

Nominated
Outstanding Casting for a Comedy Series
Won
Outstanding Guest Actress in a Comedy Series

SAG Awards, 2003

Nominated
Outstanding Performance by a Male Actor in a Comedy Series

Primetime Emmy Awards, 2002

Nominated
Outstanding Cinematography for a Multi-Camera Series
Won
Outstanding Comedy Series
Won
Outstanding Lead Actress in a Comedy Series

Satellite Award for Best Television Series – Musical or Comedy, 2002

Nominated
Satellite Award for Best Television Series – Musical or Comedy

TCA Award for Individual Achievement in Comedy, 2002

Nominated
TCA Award for Individual Achievement in Comedy

TCA Award for Outstanding Achievement in Comedy, 2002

Nominated
TCA Award for Outstanding Achievement in Comedy

Primetime Emmy Awards, 2001

Nominated
Outstanding Art Direction for a Multi-Camera Series

Satellite Award for Best Actor – Television Series Musical or Comedy, 2001

Won
Satellite Award for Best Actor – Television Series Musical or Comedy

Primetime Emmy Awards, 2000

Won
Outstanding Guest Actor in a Comedy Series

SAG Awards, 2000

Won
Outstanding Performance by a Female Actor in a Comedy Series

Zilveren Televizier-Tulp, 2000

Won
Zilveren Televizier-Tulp

Primetime Emmy Awards, 1999

Nominated
Outstanding Costumes for a Series

Primetime Emmy Awards, 1998

Won
Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series

Golden Globes, 1997

Nominated
Best Television Series – Musical or Comedy

Golden Raspberry Award for Worst New Star, 1996

Nominated
Golden Raspberry Award for Worst New Star

Primetime Emmy Awards, 1996

Won
Outstanding Directing for a Comedy Series

SAG Awards, 1996

Won
Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in a Comedy Series

Directors Guild of America Award for Outstanding Directing – Comedy Series, 1995

Nominated
Directors Guild of America Award for Outstanding Directing – Comedy Series

Primetime Emmy Awards, 1995

Nominated
Outstanding Original Main Title Theme Music
Nominated
Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series
Nominated
Outstanding Writing for a Comedy Series

If you liked this, try…

  1. Cheers (1982, Fi1m 88)Another ensemble whose sharp exchanges make familiar company worth returning to.

  2. The Mary Tyler Moore Show (1970, Fi1m 88)For character comedy that allows affection and professional frustration equal space.

  3. Spaced (1999, Fi1m 86)A smaller circle of friends, with scruffier surroundings and more visual invention.

  4. Lovesick (2014) · not reviewed yetFriendship and romantic mistakes, handled with a little more willingness to hurt.

  5. Please Like Me (2013) · not reviewed yetAwkward young adulthood, with greater candour about the pain behind the jokes.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever