Michael Scott (Steve Carell) stands with arms crossed in the office
Series review

The Office

2005 · Created by Greg Daniels · Series · ICAA 13

In a sentenceThe paperwork might get done if the boss stopped auditioning for friendship

Michael Scott (Steve Carell) runs an office at an American paper company, where the working day gives him an audience as well as responsibilities. A documentary-style camera follows the staff as they negotiate their boss and the awkward business of sharing a workplace. Around Michael are Dwight Schrute (Rainn Wilson), Jim Halpert (John Krasinski), Pam Beesly (Jenna Fischer) and Ryan Howard (B.J. Novak). Greg Daniels’s comedy follows their encounters, disagreements and attempts to get through the day, with the camera watching both the person speaking and the colleagues who have to listen.

Fi1m review

Steve Carell gives The Office enough painful neediness to make an exhausting boss worth our time. The borrowed beginnings and occasional overplaying matter, but this is a funny workplace comedy with a cast worth knowing.

An office comedy has to make repetition bearable: the same faces, the same small irritations, the same person who mistakes authority for charm. Greg Daniels’s The Office does that well enough to make its borrowed beginnings worth getting through. This American adaptation is funny and often touching, although it can push a promising embarrassment beyond the point at which anyone still seems believable. Its strongest reason to stay is Steve Carell, whose Michael Scott makes being liked look like exhausting work.

The early resemblance to the British The Office is a real problem, not merely something for loyalists to complain about. Familiar situations encourage comparison before the new cast has had much chance to establish itself, and Carell’s eagerness can initially look like an actor labouring to sell a joke. Daniels is more persuasive when the characters seem free to be foolish in their own ways. The broadening helps, provided the series remembers how little a workplace slight needs to hurt.

Carell makes Michael’s cluelessness specific: the certainty that he is entertaining company sits beside an anxious need for confirmation. We laughed, then felt sorry for him, because Carell lets the effort to seem funny show on Michael’s face. That does not excuse the boss, and the performance would be much less interesting if it did. Carell keeps enough selfishness in the part to make sympathy uncomfortable; we can understand why this man wants an audience without wanting to spend a working day giving him one.

Rainn Wilson’s Dwight Schrute supplies a firmer, more insistent comic presence, which gives Carell something useful to push against. John Krasinski’s Jim Halpert and Jenna Fischer’s Pam Beesly are more restrained, letting a look register before pressing for a laugh. Their relative quiet makes the office feel inhabited by people with different tolerances for nonsense. The ensemble matters because constant exposure to Michael alone would turn embarrassment into an endurance test.

The documentary style does useful work, too. Cinematographers Randall Einhorn and Matt Sohn favour the sense of a camera noticing behaviour rather than presenting a polished comedy routine, and the awkwardness depends on that apparent informality. Editors David Rogers and Dean Holland make the reaction as important as the remark, allowing disapproval to register without someone having to spell it out. We are left to judge the boss alongside the other faces in the office, with no canned laughter making the decision for us.

Donald Lee Harris’s production design makes the workplace plausibly unremarkable, an important restraint when the people are working so hard to be noticed. Carey Bennett’s costumes help the cast look like colleagues rather than performers assembled for a publicity photograph. Neither contribution needs to announce itself, and the plainness is part of the pleasure. The series is less convincing when the acting grows broader than these surroundings can accommodate and eccentricity becomes a sufficient reason for a joke.

Across nine series, that imbalance is enough to keep us from recommending every stretch with equal enthusiasm. The comic method can become predictable: once we are waiting for embarrassment, simply making it louder does not make it sharper. But there is enough affection in the performances to reward returning, and enough irritation to stop the company becoming cosy. Try it for Carell and the ensemble; allow the opening run some patience, but not an unlimited supply.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

65
Positive
5
Mixed
3
Negative
1
The Hollywood Reporter
24 March 2005 · Barry Garron
85*

The critic highlights how the series preserves the documentary style and satirical take on office life while giving it an American flavor through tweaks by Greg Daniels. Steve Carell delivers a superb take on the clueless boss Michael Scott, supported by a versatile cast, making it one of NBC's most unique new comedies.

Read the full review →
Empire
18 April 2006 · William Thomas
80*

The critic praises the American adaptation for maintaining the low-key, cringeworthy style of the original without glossy US sitcom elements or canned laughter. The cast, particularly Steve Carell as Michael, brings the characters to life while developing them beyond the UK version.

Read the full review →
Vulture
17 May 2013
75*

The review celebrates the series finale as a warm, ensemble-focused send-off that honors the show's journey from 2005 underdog to cultural staple, while noting that its later popularity contributed to some creative weaknesses in the final seasons.

Read the full review →
The Independent
26 March 2005
70*

The critic notes that the US version of The Office is not as good as the British original but is off to a decent start with quirky, deadpan humor that avoids a laugh track. They single out the strong writing team led by Greg Daniels for praise while acknowledging the challenges of adapting the format for American audiences.

Read the full review →
Variety
15 March 2005 · Brian Lowry
60*

The review finds the adaptation broader than the original, likely to annoy die-hard fans but still capturing awkward office moments effectively with a strong ensemble cast that looks like real people. It suggests the show might thrive more on cable than network TV.

Read the full review →
The AV Club
5 June 2013 · C-/B+ · Erik Adams
50*

The critic views the US Office pilot as a shaky, overly familiar start that struggles to differentiate itself from the British original, while praising the quick improvement in 'Diversity Day' as the show begins to find its own voice and tone.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is The Office worth watching?
The Office is worth watching for anyone who can enjoy a boss whose neediness is funny and painful in equal measure, and we scored it 77. Steve Carell's Michael Scott and a well-matched ensemble carry it, though the early episodes lean heavily on the British original and the later stretches can overplay the embarrassment. Give the opening run some patience.
How long is The Office, and what is it rated?
The Office is rated 13 by the ICAA in Spain. It is a comedy series.
Where can I watch The Office in Spain?
The Office is streaming on SkyShowtime, Disney+ and Netflix in Spain. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is The Office, and is it suitable for children?
The Office carries a UK 12 certificate and a US TV-14 rating, and its discomfort is social rather than violent or frightening. The humour comes from an insensitive boss, workplace slights and awkward silences, so there is nothing to alarm younger children beyond jokes they may not follow. Teenagers and adults who can bear sustained embarrassment are the natural audience.
How does The Office compare to Office Space?
The Office is a documentary-style series about surviving a boss who wants an audience, while Office Space is a film about employees quietly plotting against the management jargon that surrounds them. The film is tighter and its humiliations sharper, though its thin plot fades in the final third; the series has more room for its cast to grow on you. Choose Office Space for a single sharp evening and The Office for company over many.
What should I watch after The Office?
After The Office, try Office Space (1999, Fi1m 80): For anyone who finds management jargon more frightening than unemployment. Then The Thick of It (2005, Fi1m 94): Workplace incompetence under greater pressure, with much less forgiving language; and Parks and Recreation (2009, Fi1m 83): Another workplace ensemble that allows foolish people to earn our affection.

Cast

If you liked this, try…

  1. Office Space (1999, Fi1m 80)For anyone who finds management jargon more frightening than unemployment.

  2. The Thick of It (2005, Fi1m 94)Workplace incompetence under greater pressure, with much less forgiving language.

  3. Parks and Recreation (2009, Fi1m 83)Another workplace ensemble that allows foolish people to earn our affection.

  4. Toni Erdmann (2016, Fi1m 86)Corporate manners and unbearable embarrassment, with a father determined to interfere.

  5. The Apartment (1960, Fi1m 91)Office ambition, compromised kindness and comedy that knows when to hurt.

Free account

Know what to watch tonight

Two lists that know where things are streaming, collections you can share, your own score beside ours, and Discover that remembers what you have seen.

  • Want to see, sorted by what is streaming now
  • Seen, with your score out of ten
  • No adverts, ever