Jamie Fraser (Sam Heughan) tending a kettle over a fire in a cave
Series review

Outlander

2014 · Created by Ronald D. Moore · Series

In a sentenceWe would happily stay in the Highlands if the voice-over would take the afternoon off

Time travel carries Claire Randall Fraser (Caitríona Balfe) into the past, where the rules governing women’s lives differ from the ones she knows. In the Scottish Highlands, she encounters Jamie Fraser (Sam Heughan) and Colum MacKenzie (Gary Lewis), and begins trying to understand the society around them. A love triangle complicates her adjustment, drawing her into relationships that cross the divide between eras. Claire must navigate unfamiliar customs alongside her own changing feelings. The opening follows her adjustment through romance and the threat of violence, as her expectations come up against those of the people around her.

Plays from YouTube when you press play; nothing loads from them until then.

Fi1m review

Outlander is worth settling into for Caitríona Balfe and Sam Heughan, and for a romance that takes its heroine seriously. The caveats are a slow start and narration that seldom knows when to stop.

Ronald D. Moore’s Outlander asks us to accept time travel and then spend considerably longer watching people negotiate their differences. We recommend it as a patient romantic drama, though its slow opening is a real obstacle. It gives courtship time to become interesting, allowing differences in experience and expectation to complicate the attraction. The fantasy premise gets things moving, but the relationships give us a reason to stay, especially when the programme trusts its actors enough to stop explaining them.

Caitríona Balfe, playing Claire Randall Fraser, holds our attention through passages that might otherwise feel uneventful. There is intelligence in her performance, and a firmness that makes Claire’s opinions matter even when the romance invites her to forget her reservations. She remains alert to what the people around her expect, and to whether she wants to comply. That watchfulness gives the historical setting a useful edge: the restrictions of this society register through someone who has reason to question them.

Sam Heughan’s Jamie Fraser supplies enough warmth to make the time spent on attraction worthwhile. The chemistry is persuasive, and the series understands that learning how another person thinks can sustain our interest without a fresh emergency every few minutes. Its frankness about sex belongs to that interest in relationships, with the female perspective shaping how intimacy is presented. The central performances make room for curiosity and uncertainty, which helps the romance feel less predetermined than its handsome leads might suggest.

The cinematography teams include Nic Lawson and Neville Kidd, and the Highland views receive enough attention to become a pleasure in themselves. Production designers Mike Gunn and Jon Gary Steele contribute to settings that make the different periods feel distinct, giving the time travel a visible consequence. The surroundings help us understand why adjusting to another era would involve more than learning a few unfamiliar manners. There is a risk of admiring the scenery while waiting for something to happen, but the cast usually keeps the people interesting enough.

The editing is less consistently persuasive, with Michael O’Halloran and Tammis Chandler among the credited team. Early passages sometimes linger after their emotional point has become clear, and the resulting loss of urgency is difficult to ignore. Bear McCreary’s music suits a romance that takes its characters’ feelings seriously and has no wish to apologise for doing so. That sincerity is welcome, although the score cannot make every extended scene feel necessary.

The narration is the more persistent problem. We were irritated by the voice-over because it kept spelling out feelings that Caitríona Balfe’s performance had already made clear. Ronald D. Moore and the writing team seem anxious to ensure that nobody misses Claire’s thinking, but the extra guidance makes it harder to enjoy discovering her through her behaviour. It also interrupts the intimacy the series otherwise handles well, adding commentary when a look or an exchange has already done the work.

John Dahl’s direction helps establish a tone capable of accommodating tenderness and violence without making either seem imported from another programme. The violence can be graphic, so the scenic pleasures are a poor guide to how comfortable an evening this will provide. Among historical romances, its attention to a woman’s desire and judgement gives the familiar attractions a welcome seriousness. Try it for the central pair, but if the early pace wears you down, do not expect the Highlands alone to change your mind.

Critical consensus AI synthesised

71
Positive
5
Mixed
3
Negative
0
The Telegraph
26 March 2015 · Charlotte Runcie
80*

The adaptation is an impressive rival to Game of Thrones with rugged landscapes, bloody battles, graphic sex and a female perspective on the epic, gruesome fantasy. It succeeds despite a time-travel premise that initially seems unpromising.

Read the full review →
Vulture
7 August 2014 · Matt Zoller Seitz
80*

The critic argues that Outlander succeeds on its own terms as a thoughtful, character-driven story about gender, relationships, and cultural differences across eras, rather than trying to mimic Game of Thrones. He singles out director John Dahl’s establishment of a gentle yet unflinching tone that handles violence and intimacy with restraint.

Read the full review →
IndieWire
4 August 2014 · Liz Shannon Miller
70*

The critic finds the series promising in its premise and performances but hampered by excessive and distracting voice-over narration that undermines the storytelling. She singles out the strong casting and the vivid historical setting for praise while urging the show to let the visuals and dialogue carry more weight.

Read the full review →
The Hollywood Reporter
7 August 2014 · Tim Goodman
66*

The critic finds the time-travel premise interesting and well-executed as a romantic adaptation of the books, with strong performances especially from Caitriona Balfe, but criticizes the languid pacing and lack of urgency that makes the storytelling feel slow and not compelling.

Read the full review →
Variety
2 August 2014 · Brian Lowry and Laura Prudom
64*

The piece presents split views: one finds it a handsome but dramatically flaccid snooze with slow pacing that tests patience; the other praises it as a measured, atmospheric, faithful adaptation with a strong female lead, steamy equal-opportunity romance, and boundary-pushing scenes.

Read the full review →
The Times
27 March 2015 · ★★★ · Andrew Billen
60

The time-travel drama features schoolgirlishly bad narration and will mainly appeal to fantasy devotees and the Scottish Tourist Board, though the love triangle and Highland scenery may draw some viewers in.

Read the full review →

Straight answers AI written, from our review

Is Outlander worth watching?
Outlander is worth watching for patient viewers who enjoy romantic drama, and we score it 74 out of 100. Caitríona Balfe and Sam Heughan make the central relationship persuasive, with Claire’s desires and judgement taken seriously, but the slow opening and voice-over that explains feelings the actors already convey are substantial irritations.
Where can I watch Outlander in Greece?
Outlander is streaming on Netflix in Greece. Availability is checked daily; the links above go straight to each service.
How violent or frightening is Outlander, and is it suitable for children?
Outlander has a UK 18 certificate and contains graphic violence and frank depictions of sex, making it unsuitable for children. We would also caution squeamish adults: the Highland scenery and tender romance are no guarantee of comfortable viewing, and the threat of violence forms part of Claire’s adjustment to the past.
How does Outlander compare to A Matter of Life and Death?
Outlander offers a slower, more demanding romance than A Matter of Life and Death, which we recommend more readily for its humour, feeling and performances. Both give their lovers more attention than the rules of their fantasy premises, but Outlander suits viewers willing to settle into an extended courtship despite intrusive narration; the film’s speeches only occasionally labour the point.
What should I watch after Outlander?
After Outlander, try A Matter of Life and Death (1946, Fi1m 92): An impossible romance that gives its lovers more attention than its rules. Then The Piano (1993, Fi1m 88): A woman’s desire unsettles a historical household, with performances that need little explanation; and Poldark (2015, Fi1m 77): Another patient period romance, attentive to the friction between longing and social position.

Cast

Awards

Saturn Awards, 2019

Won
Best Actor on Television

People's Choice Awards, 2017

Won
People's Choice Awards

Satellite Award for Best Cast – Television Series, 2017

Won
Satellite Award for Best Cast – Television Series

Satellite Award for Best Television Series – Genre, 2017

Won
Satellite Award for Best Television Series – Genre

Critics' Choice Awards, 2016

Won
Critics' Choice Television Award

Saturn Awards, 2016

Won
Best Fantasy Television Series

Saturn Awards, 2015

Won
Best Actress on Television

Critics' Choice Awards, 2014

Won
Most Exciting New Series

If you liked this, try…

  1. A Matter of Life and Death (1946, Fi1m 92)An impossible romance that gives its lovers more attention than its rules.

  2. The Piano (1993, Fi1m 88)A woman’s desire unsettles a historical household, with performances that need little explanation.

  3. Somewhere in Time (1980) · not on Fi1m yetTime travel gives two lovers difficulties that good manners cannot resolve.

  4. The Return of Martin Guerre (1982) · not on Fi1m yetA rural historical drama where intimate relationships make questions of trust increasingly difficult.

  5. Poldark (2015, Fi1m 77)Another patient period romance, attentive to the friction between longing and social position.